8 Comments
User's avatar
Ned's avatar

As usual, there's so much in your post.

e.g.

‘The risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19 in children is effectively ZERO.’’

As I understood this was well known at the time, yet they still treated children appallingly.

Mind you, I simply do not believe there was a health emergency, so the whole policy was insane.

biologyphenom's avatar

It's not that much when you consider the inquiry sessions are is 2-3 hours usually. Highlights here total 15'ish mins?

Ned's avatar

There is so much information to absorb & I simply do not digest all I'd like to. I don't know the answer other than an English Broadcasting Service fit for purpose which presented an accurate summation across the board whether Russia, Gaza, health, child rape etc...

I would like to think the public will not so easily succumb to another pandemic, but the public do have a tendency to disappoint.

biologyphenom's avatar

That's why i do bullet points to help. Agree v public alot of people miss the panicdemic drama.

Ned's avatar

Your layout does help.

biologyphenom's avatar

Doing my best Ned. This is a serious substack for people serious about real truths. Plenty of people charging £$ for your latest rabbit hole to nowhere that has politicians ROFL ;-)

Dee Dee's avatar

Everyone I know who took it got sick, had a serious illness or died and no one is reporting on it...

Bill's avatar

The net benefit for children is clearly negative. The idea of a net benefit for the elderly of hypothetical and I believe will be negative but we won’t know until we get all of the data from insurance companies about total deaths and total medical expenses by number of Covid shots and birth year.