UK COVID-19 Inquiry|4 Nov 2024
Testimony by Patricia Anne Temple from the Royal College of Nursing.
Introduction
Patricia Anne Temple is a band 5 level NHS staff nurse. She worked in a cardiac care unit in an NHS trust and worked full-time nights at weekends. She has been a qualified registered nurse working in various countries since 1972.
I found this testimony was very withdrawn with a focus on the usual ‘get out of jail free’ cards of ‘‘inadequate PPE’’ and testing and how these were ‘‘systemic failures’’ however there were a few interesting remarks i took note of.
‘COVID’ patients
Many ‘COVID’ patients admitted during lockdown had no COVID symptoms only later (time period not specified) were designated as suspected COVID or COVID after (no doubt) a barrage of high CT PCR ‘testing.’
‘‘At various stages we were not aware if patients were COVID positive or not.’’
Masks
Ms.Temple became ill shortly after the testing of various masks.
‘‘They put the mask on then they INJECTED A SMELL.’’
‘‘The computer told us the mask didn’t provide protection.’’
‘‘The last one they tested on me..the stealth mask was the one that gave adequate protection…i was ILL shortly thereafter.’
Stealth mask
Imagine being greeted by NHS staff wearing this in future, perhaps even with dark goggles.
NHS mask compliance
The ‘COVID’ psychosis is laid bare here once again. eg- Nurses were disregarding their prior experience AND common sense in the name of ‘COVID.’
‘‘We tried to keep them on…it was difficult to keep your mask on while you ate and drank.’’
‘‘The infection control princinples some of them really didn’t seem to make sense.’’
Testing
NHS staff were more concerned about financial loss than ‘COVID’ So no real fear of ‘the virus’?
‘‘People were reluctant to be tested becuse of the implications if you went off sick.’’
‘‘Staff tried to avoid testing as much as possible because of the financial implications.’‘
Isolation policies
We should never forget how NHS staff IMPOSED inhumane visiting restrictions on families.
‘‘It found it really sad…i remember one patient (a learning disabled man) talking to his mum on the phone..who couldn’t understand why she couldn’t come and see him and he was DYING.’’
In her statement at paragraph 18 she says:
‘‘It went against our nursing ethics and against our need to advocate for patients and their best interests.’’
‘Long COVID’
Ms.Temple developed ‘Long COVID’ involving Tachycardia and lung damage and in her statement she explains this occured November 2020. She blames looking after ‘COVID’ patients with inadequate PPE. She took ill health dismissal Sept 2023 after successfully claiming temporary Injury Allowance (‘‘TIA’’).
Mandatory COVID ‘vaccinations’
This segment reveals that Ms.Temple ONLY agreed to ‘vaccination’ in order to facilitate a trip to South Africa. Clearly she was either NOT confident in the injection and or not afraid of ‘COVID.’ Other NHS nurses were refusing to be innoculated with experimental mRNA/DNA.
‘‘The only reason i took the vaccine was so that i could travel.’’
‘‘I remember two nurses particularly who were very certain they were NOT prepared to take the vaccine.’’
In her statement at paragraph 10 Ms.Temple says:
‘‘There were a fair number of staff who were very reluctant to take the vaccine —including myself.’’
Conclusions
Ms.Temple stated she and many other nurses felt ‘disposable’ and now suffer from ‘‘compassion fatigue.’’
I know who was really disposable during ‘COVID’ and is this compassion? Forgoing your prior training then ENFORCING inhumane rules upon DYING patients with learning disabilities who were kept apart from their loved ones. Just following orders is no excuse otherwise where is the limit?
Article 7 - Crimes against humanity
(e) ‘‘Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law.’’
(k) ‘‘Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.’’
What i find absolutely chilling about this testimony is ‘‘lessons learned’’ will highly likely look like this in future and in my opinion both UK and Scottish inquiries have always been pre-determined to conclude with the following.
More ‘testing’
More masks this time suffocating FFP3
More fear and hysteria
More novel injections
Thanks for reading.
End
Links:
Full statement- https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/04170252/INQ000486012.pdf
Video-Youtube-UK COVID-19 Inquiry-Module 3-4th Nov 2024
https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/icc-statute-1998/article-7
Lessons learned ? Next time ( and there will be a next time) lockdowns will will be harder, faster and longer because they have proven that they are able to do whatever they will with us without humanity, pity and totally free from fear of accountability or repercussions.
I found Ms Temple's testimony to be weak, self serving - entirely suitable for Hallett's Inquiry. She had the mysterious condition of 'long covid'. If it wasn't for the thousands of nurses with consciences marching against the imposition of 'vaxx' passports, Ms Temple wouldn't have been able to make a choice about having the injection to travel. Those marches were not given publicity because the government did not want people to hear the passionate speeches, nor see the support they had, marching alongside them.