Scottish COVID-19 inquiry|Impact hearing|Health and social care|27 October 2023 (afternoon session)
Powerful statements made by members of Care Home Relatives Scotland Group.
Introduction
CHRS was founded on 12 August 2020. On that date, Cathie Russell, following discussion with another daughter she had seen comment on Twitter, set up a Facebook group. This lady was very involved with the work of the CHRS core group up until September 2023 when she retired due to personal commitments. Sheila Hall, whose mother was in a care home, was put in touch with Cathie via social media. Alison Leitch joined the group in August 2020 having been concerned that there were no organisations speaking out on behalf of those in care homes during ‘the pandemic’.
Testimony highlights
Aims and objective of CHRS from August 2020.
To enhance quality of life of loved ones in care homes by resuming essential family contact.
To encourage a person centred approach to support emotional well-being and to avoid isolation.
To develop lines of communication with policy makers and represent the views of relatives with loved ones in care homes.
‘‘We’d all been struggling being cut off from our relatives for so long…we were starting to see pictures of people sitting 3 metres away BEHIND POLICE TAPE.’’
‘‘We wanted common sense back as the measures being taken were so detrimental to our loved ones.’’
‘‘We had husbands and wives who had been together for 40, 50 or more years and they were no longer being allowed to see each other.’’
Contacting MSPs and others for help
Below is a damning list of all the organisations complicit in lockdown harms who refused to heed the warnings. The CHRS group contacted the following midway through 2020.
Scottish Government and government officials
Campaign groups
MSPs from each political party
Scottish Human Rights Commission
Mental Welfare Commission
Human Rights Consortium Scotland
Scottish Care
Care home providers
Public Health Scotland
Care Inspectorate
Alzheimer’s Scotland
‘‘There were 14 directors of public health in Scotland and we wrote to them all and very few did we get replies from…we didn’t get anything substantive.’’
Jeanne Freeman
After a protest outside the Scottish parliament on the 16th Sept 2020 a meeting with health secretary Jeanne Freeman was arranged. Ms.Freeman took the points rasied by the group on board and soon after updated guidance on visting was issued however in practise the rules and restrictions became even more harsh.
‘‘By the time the (new) guidance had come out it made no difference as Glasgow had gone into a different tier..so there wasn’t going to be any care home visiting in Greater Glasgow or Lanarkshire.’’
‘‘33% responded that visiting had actually WORSENED in the period since the new guidance had been issued.’’
No meetings with the First Minister
Disturbingly, the former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon never met with the group despite many requests.
‘‘We were all VERY disappointed…care residents were not on her radar.’’
Human rights
In this harrowing segement Ms.Cathie Russell outlines the annihilation of human rights.
‘‘We felt the rights our loved ones and ours had been COMPLETELY TRASHED from day one.’’
All care standards breached
Human rights community silent
‘‘No one asked my mother..would she rather take a risk with a virus and she her family and i could 100% guarantee what she would have chosen.’’
‘‘People in care homes had ABSOLUTELY BEEN INCARCERATED.’’
‘‘I had a call from a relative of one gentleman in a care home who committed suicide because his daily walks had been stopped for six months.’’
Closing remarks
Residents in care homes in Scotland during lockdown had no access for over 1 year to:
Opticians
Podiatry
Hairdressing
Fresh air
‘Those paid for by the public purse to protect the interests of vulnerable people FAILED to speak out on behalf of those in care homes such as directors of social work and the office of the public guardian.’’
‘‘IMPRISONING people for a year and isolating people in small rooms for weeks on end should be challenged.’’
‘‘Many people in Greater Glasgow and Lanarkshire areas had no DIRECT contact with their loves ones for A FULL YEAR.’’
NB: The above regions experienced the most ‘COVID deaths in Scotland and disturbingly…..
‘When Public Health Scotland produced a final set of COVID guidance in January this year (2023)…
…care home guidance had been amalgamated with guidance for prisoners.'‘
-Alison Leitch (Care Home Relatives Scotland)
CHRS member statements
From the hundreds of impact statements of CHRS members on the adverse effects of lockdown restrictions they included:
165 mentions of stress/anxiety and depression
100 mentions of guilt or worry
59 mentions of sadness/abandonment or hopelessness
49 mentions of heartbreak
‘‘It felt everytime there was progress in terms of access care home residents another obstacle appeared’’
There simply was no meaningful way for families to be with their loved ones during lockdown.
No visits w/touch
No xmas decorations
No seeing dying relatives
No alternating visitors
No outside visits
The cruelty being inflicted on our most frail was total……
'We can't let you hold your dying relatives hand.'
‘Annes Law’
Remarkably CHRS has been ‘‘fighting for’’ the implementation of ‘Anne’s Law’ with similar proposals in England called ‘Gloria’s Law.’ This would in effect LEGALISE many of the harms the group have so passionately argued against.
‘Anne’s Law’ - giving nominated relatives or friends the same access rights to care homes as staff while following stringent infection control procedures.
In effect legitimising…
Lockdown (which cause only severe harm on populations)
Fear based protocols (social distancing etc), semi isolation (only ONE family member will be allowed to visit, time limited)
The wearing of face masks (disproven benefits yet proven harmful)
PCR testing (discredited as does not detect infectiousness)
+Any other public health diktat decided by public health or government in a future outbreak inclusive of yet more fast tracked experimental injections. Therefore if one were to refuse ANY future government/public health diktat you would be denied access.
Full video
Please help share this information.
End
Links:
Full statement- https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0731-000001.pdf
https://services.nhslothian.scot/carehomes/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2022/09/A-right-to-family-life-%E2%80%93-Alison-Leitch-and-Natasha-Hamilton.pdf
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-60945582
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-66019355
Full video: Scottish COVID-19 inquiry YouTube-Impact hearing | Health and social care | 27 October 2023 (afternoon session)
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-11-lack-friend-family-dying.html
Reminder:
People were not allowed to decide for themselves whether or not to accept an alleged health risk ('contagion'). The argument for paternalism was that every additional case of illness would overburden the system. We now know that this was a lie from start to finish.
So people were 'protected' even against their will. Grandmas could have voluntarily locked themselves in if they were really scared to death of 'infection'. Anyone could have done that. Grannies did not benefit in any way from knowing that their grandchildren were also locked up, not voluntarily but by force. It would have made no difference to the grannies, it would have brought no advantage, but only disadvantages for the grandchildren.
Back to the idea of consensus. If it had really always been about protecting the health system, all other avoidable hazards would have been banned, such as smoking and alcohol. After all, hundreds of thousands die every year from the consequences of consumption, and millions fall ill as a result. That means hundreds of thousands of beds overburdening the system without need, yet no one intervenes.
Based on the logic of protecting people against their express wishes and thus overriding their right to autonomy, children, also people with the right to bodily autonomy, were subjected to the most severe abuse.
Where was the resistance of the elderly?
A society that sets fire to its children to keep the old ones warm is doomed.
This is the reason why no one should ever follow or look to the WHO as experts in anything but cruelty, ever again!