23 Comments
Nov 6Liked by biologyphenom

Totally horrendous. The idiots have totally ruined a generation and a society. If this country had any guts those who introduced, perpetuated and supported these measures, would all be in jail.

I think that Northern Ireland is not having an inquiry so those horrible people won’t face any consequences. Those primarily being Michael McBride CMO and Robin Swann Health Minister. Disgraceful.

Expand full comment

As a former teacher this horrifies me. The first 1000 days are crucial to a child's development. This was state sponsored child abuse.

Expand full comment
author

The other testimony Play Scotland CEO commented- ''‘The growth period between 0 and 8 is MASSIVE.’’

Expand full comment

Oh absolutely. With reference to the first 1000 days, it's something like 80% of a child's brain is formed during this period, with crucial neural pathways being made.

Expand full comment
Nov 6Liked by biologyphenom

It was always the vulnerable who were subjected to the most damage from the draconian rules and "health" measures in the fake pandemic. Frail elderly, physically disabled,mentally disabled and children come under the umbrella of vulnerable. And in that group the financially and socially poorest probably sustained the most damage.

The official narrative will be yes some mistakes were made but there was no other option in a time of great emergency. Lessons will be learned and we will do better the next time: if that does not make your blood run cold then nothing will. Children were demonised as "superspreaders" I remember that time, it truly was sickening and shameful to hear and see those lies repeated in the media. All that happened in 2020 onwards is becoming more and more disturbing for me.

Expand full comment
author
Nov 6·edited Nov 6Author

When you realise no mistakes were made that's really chilling and that the ''freedom'' movements protesting and vocal in 2020-2021 now when the facts are in 2024 choose to remain completely silent over the official evidence of gross harms being admitted.

Expand full comment
Nov 6Liked by biologyphenom

And that is the tell, their disinterest in the severe harms sustained to the vulnerable in society. Many of them have profited from the pandemic with their YouTube channels and the selling of their covid supplements but have completely ignored the devastation done to the vulnerable from government action, there is no profit to gain from that. There viewers are led on a merry go round with no destination and it has been going on for four years. As the cowardly Noam Chomsky said "the smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of accepted opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum": our "freedom fighters" have been told what the limited spectrum of accepted opinion is and keep within those rules and I think are rewarded.

Expand full comment
author
Nov 6·edited Nov 6Author

''Our "freedom fighters" have been told what the limited spectrum of accepted opinion is and keep within those rules and I think are rewarded.''

-Absolutely, it's crystal clear and if i am being honest i can't think of a single popular ''freedom'' advocate i believe is genuine. The reality laid bare by the Scottish COVID inquiry and even recently at UK has exposed so many as nothing but self promoting mouthpieces otherwise they would be doing everything in their power to constantly highlight all this OFFICIAL damning evidence. Instead they will wax lyrical over ANY other subject and ask for money whilst doing so. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybLkVEfdnKs&ab_channel=NeilOliver

Expand full comment

I agree with you about the fake "freedom fighters." But it makes sense when you realise that this has been planned decades in advance. I believe that some MP's have also been installed to await the moment when they need to play their part in supressing the truth. Sleeping agents.

Expand full comment

This was experimentation on children, as part of the Rockefeller lockdown scenario plan. Many children have been damaged. It seems to be part of their ongoing attempts to disempower parents and make children effectively wards of state. It is important to remember that this was all guidance though. It must have been very hard for teachers to stand up to it, but it is crucial that they are aware that they can refuse to follow guidance if it happens again. In the same way that most doctors complied, so did most teachers, although teachers can be forgiven for probably not realising their own power to refuse to go along with guidance when it damages children. I do not make that excuse for doctors. They are supposed to look after the health of people, not do everythign they can to make them sick.

Expand full comment
author

Yes Cally, great comments, couldn't agree more. I noticed the media completely ignored the statements from the Nov 5th sessions but did report the following which relates to your comment.

'' It seems to be part of their ongoing attempts to disempower parents and make children effectively wards of state''

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp9z07emr99o

Expand full comment

Very well said although I would not forgive teachers that easily. It was self evident to me in 2020 and I was and am stuggling with my health (in part due to ignorant and unprofessional doctors).

< It is important to remember that this was all guidance though.>

This is especially well said. I say this broadly to the world - GUIDANCE people, guidance. You did NOT have to follow it even if common sense had departed your brain. The gov.uk website always said Guidance (did also have 'and advice' but that was removed at some point).

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/g-is-forguidance?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
author
Nov 7·edited Nov 7Author

Yes, and this ''guidance'' is cited over and over again at Scottish inquiry as being problematic so that they can make it LAW next time, (eg-Annes Law'') make no mistake this is the direction of travel.

Expand full comment

Oh is that what they are up to now. Well in that case people can use the argument under common law that when laws appear to be unconstitutional or basically immoral it is duty under the law to refuse to comply with them. Human rights Act is a waste of time because most rights are qualified which means you don't have them if they claim 'emergency'. In fact under our own constitution none of the laws are valid today because the Rule of Law has been abandoned. The separation of powers has gone, the laws are not easy to understand (fudged) - people can't tell guidance from law etc, legislation is too complex, the law is not easily accessible for ordinary people, and it is not open access equally to all since it depends on how much money you have (legal aid is not properly or fully funded). Without the Rule of Law the British constitution is meaningless and our laws are invalid (under the ruling cult's own rules).

Expand full comment

Thank you. They cannot make such things law ultimately as one can't live by laws. This is what the COVID 19 should have made clear to everybody, but the love of many grew cold.

I like to say it is love that must govern people's hearts and that cannot be legislated.

Expand full comment
author

It's truly biblical what is transpiring.

Matthew 24:12- ''Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold.''

Expand full comment

Amen. That is the verse I was thinking about. Bizarrely, the love of most grew cold over fear of what some would describe as a cold!

I mentioned the verse in a post I did last April Fool's Day as a reminder of the day the world became foolish, although I have referred to it before that. I will attach link if I may.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/april-fools-day-and-the-play-of-the?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment

m Oxford Languages

Enter a word

Look it up

tor·ture

[ˈtɔːtʃə]

noun

the action or practice of inflicting severe pain or suffering on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something:

"the torture of political prisoners" · "confessions extracted under torture" · "a torture chamber"

Expand full comment

Doctors from hell: The horrific account of Nazi experiments on humans

Vivien Spitz

Sentient Publications, 2005

A chilling story of human depravity and ultimate justice, told for the first time by an eyewitness court reporter for the Nuremberg war crimes trial of Nazi doctors. This is the account of 22 men and 1 woman and the torturing and killing by experiment they authorized in the name of scientific research and patriotism. Doctors from Hell includes trial transcripts that have not been easily available to the general public and previously unpublished photographs used as evidence in the trial. The author describes the experience of being in bombed-out, dangerous, post-war Nuremberg, where she lived for two years while working on the trial. Once a Nazi sympathizer tossed bombs into the dining room of the hotel where she lived moments before she arrived for dinner. She takes us into the courtroom to hear the dramatic testimony and see the reactions of the defendants to the proceedings. This landmark trial resulted in the establishment of the Nuremberg code, which set the guidelines for medical research involving human beings. A significant addition to the literature on World War II and the Holocaust, medical ethics, human rights, and the barbaric depths to which human beings can descend.

https://books.google.com/books?hl=de&lr=&id=_VH-7oeT4lEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=info:MqVkOJikVEkJ:scholar.google.com/&ots=7UGqQty3gz&sig=AIVs1qo0qAuC4dF1QLru3SW_idA

Expand full comment
author

2020 history repeats.

Expand full comment

There has been a great increase in ‘home schooling’ - parents are voting with their feet and many - if circumstances allow - are choosing to not let their children be subject to such state dictatorial behaviours with their children being used as experimental fodder and at the mercy of professionals who can choose or not choose to make their lives a misery.

As an aside, many also take issue with the proscribed state endorsed curriculum and current narratives being forced upon their children as ‘truths.’

Expand full comment

So the farce continues. If I was Lorna Kettles I would be boiling with rage!

All this was self evident in 2020 and here we are 4 years latter and they are just talking about it in some academic way. These people are morons of the first order.

Expand full comment
author

None of them appear to have any real concern about the restriction harms all justified in the name of 'COVID.'

Expand full comment