There not friends they are government order following sheep i have a lot of them to i dont give them any advice now and if another one came along tomorrow [it soon will] they will all line up again like good little brainwashed lemmings so my advice feck em
There's a long and inglorious history of mass psychosis in humans - Mathias Desmet called it 'mass formation'.
I live in Dumfries and Galloway and the father of a doctor in DGRI told me that they had so few cases in the 'pandemic' that they resorted to watching Netflix to pass the long boring nights!
It has been a pandemic of the deluded. Yes there were viral infections, there are viral illnesses every year but there was not a "pandemic" of a specific viral infection. Doctors and nurses are as easily fooled as anyone, flu, coronavirus, they do not know the difference, over 60% of viral infections are unidentified every year. Make the flu disappear, bring in the PCR tests that picks up genetic material and abracadabra we have the new kid on the block the magical covid that means different symptoms to different people.
The asymptomatic scam was pure genius werent it how anyone bought that is insane but we are talking about hide behind the couch government order followers here
We must start to forget about viruses and epidemiology when it comes to Covid.
This illness is firmly in the realm of the individual and collective mind.
If we want to understand the phenomenon we have just witnessed we need to start studying carl Jung and his writings on the human mind and Mass Psychosis.
It was he who famously warned of the dangers of a Mass Psychosis outbreak (Psychic epidemic)
“Indeed, it is becoming ever more obvious that it is not famine, not earthquakes, not microbes, not cancer but man himself who is man’s greatest danger to man, for the simple reason that there is no adequate protection against psychic epidemics, which are infinitely more devastating than the worst of natural catastrophes.”
In N. Ireland during 4 years of a deadly pandemic 275 people died OF Covid, the youngest was 38. Source--the N.I Dept of Health from an FoI
Actually they died at the same rate as flu----except no one died of flu. Indeed our Health Minister was given a report which predicted....275 deaths, but he chose to use the worst case scenario in the report of 14,000 deaths when enforcing lockdowns.
It is, I suggest, in the public interest for you to name the alternative media outlet which declined to publish the fruits of your diligent and highly significant investigation into the Dumfries and Galloway deaths.
Social media has more than its share of "limited hangout" operators, as I (a former national newspaper journalist) have, discovered in seeking to interest so-called "independent" news purveyors in material which undermines the increasingly threadbare official pandemic narrative.
UKCOLUMN. I have more Foi articles incoming. I wrote a stack last year. They also have point blank refused to cover ANY of the harrowing and important fopotage from the Scottish COVID inquiry.
That's interesting. I have been trying in vain to get UKCOLUMN to dig into what I call the Calamari Clots Cover-Up. And this despite me sending, some time ago, a detailed note on the subject, plus numerous links to relevant info and contacts, plus a suggested intro to the article and the offer of my free further help if they needed it. They completely ignored my initial email and when I wrote again to ask received some pretty feeble excuses. Only this morning, I sent them another email pointing to a new twist to the calamari clots story which would give them a chance to run something immediately based on no more than a single interview with John O'Looney, the UK the undertaker who has been trying for a year or more to interest the Establishment and mainstream media in the wealth of evidence has amassed on these strange, potentially lethal clots, and their contribution to the rising excess deaths toll.
As well as UKColumn (and a number of mainstream newspapers) I also contacted the Daily Sceptic (run by free speech advocate Toby Young) and sent them the same dossier - with - so far - the same disappointing outcome.
Yes, i've had no joy with Daily Sceptic with regards to covering Scottish COVID inquiry. Stunning an almost total blanket 'ban' on this whether by design or just some psychosis. Revealling all the same i thik as to the importance of what has been said and if those in the alternative media cannot grasp that it's embarassing.
This has to be the most concise, evidence-based review of what ACTUALLY happened during the plandemic that I have read. Fantastic work, and thank you so much for sharing this with all of us. We all must continue to resist and fight for OUR rights.
Yes, I can I will send it to you when I get back from holiday. I know this because I had to defend myself in court against charges of acting aggressive at my local vax centre. I did a lot of research and I proved myself to be innocent. If my memory serves me rightly there were only around 12 vax exemption certificates issued in the whole of Scotland!
Interesting. I was denied an immunity certificate by local GPs even though I gave plasma on request for treatment purpose as I had documented after testing Covid antibodies. (3 day sore throat.)
It's a long story. I needed to attend a wedding in Austria but was never going to participate in the vaccine clinical trial.
I exchanged several letters with Sunak (my local MP) and the local GP practice who replied with the expected gutless BS. I missed the wedding.
Somebody had ordered that these certificates of immunity should not be granted.
Who? The MPs who granted themselves exemption from the co-erced vaccine trial?
My GP practice directed me to attend "My local vaccine centre" which was 12 miles away. I had antibody tests for my whole family (my wife had 2 experimental injections) me and my children didn't have any. We all had something we all were positive apart from my son who's result was "inconclusive". I contacted my MP & MSP raising my concerns and pointing out the damming evidence the were as much use as chocolate fireguards. My then MP has been in hospital with a spinal stroke since April. The MSP is a Dr! I believe anyone asking for an exemption were being intentionally discriminated as there wasn't anything in place. When I asked at the vaccine centre they'd never heard of it and tried to coerce me into taking it!
Sarscov1 in Asia from 2002 to 2004 was highly lethal (30-50% of infections, although the exact figure is unknown).
As a result, the host died immediately along with Sarscov1, and the spread of infection was small.
On the other hand, virology believes that if it is highly infectious, it is less lethal because it cannot spread by killing the host.
In fact, the 2020 Phase Ⅰclinical trial report from Pfizer, which is full of fraud, shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people out of 1000.
This means that 993 out of 1000 people will be the same whether they are vaccinated or not.
It also shows that even if everyone is unvaccinated, the infection rate is 8 people out of 1000.
This is where the big problem lies [ the difference between RRR and ARR ].
Many doctors (not to mention laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by FDA, CDC, and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, all of whom are unvaccinated, and 1,000 of them become infected.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate RRR will be 90%.
However, even if all of them are unvaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate ARR will be abt. 0.1%.
This is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to an individual.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is never the RRR.
There is a definition formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people are vaccinated, even people who should not have experienced side effects will suffer from them.
In some cases, people who would not have died without being infected will die from side effects.
However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV also promote the relative effectiveness rate RRR,
and continue to mislead people into thinking that the probability that an individual can avoid infection is RRR.
The reason for this can only be either lack of knowledge or intentional selling for money.
Below are the results of my numerical calculations from several clinical trial documents.
Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
In 2020 I lost friends over saying things like this … the truth is the truth. Great work.
There not friends they are government order following sheep i have a lot of them to i dont give them any advice now and if another one came along tomorrow [it soon will] they will all line up again like good little brainwashed lemmings so my advice feck em
Yes, me too. They're looking a bit sheepish now.
There's a long and inglorious history of mass psychosis in humans - Mathias Desmet called it 'mass formation'.
I live in Dumfries and Galloway and the father of a doctor in DGRI told me that they had so few cases in the 'pandemic' that they resorted to watching Netflix to pass the long boring nights!
The best, most compelling raw research I have encountered comes from unaffiliated independents like yourself. Stay independent 👍
Are they perhaps too close to the Establishment?
It has been a pandemic of the deluded. Yes there were viral infections, there are viral illnesses every year but there was not a "pandemic" of a specific viral infection. Doctors and nurses are as easily fooled as anyone, flu, coronavirus, they do not know the difference, over 60% of viral infections are unidentified every year. Make the flu disappear, bring in the PCR tests that picks up genetic material and abracadabra we have the new kid on the block the magical covid that means different symptoms to different people.
The asymptomatic scam was pure genius werent it how anyone bought that is insane but we are talking about hide behind the couch government order followers here
We must start to forget about viruses and epidemiology when it comes to Covid.
This illness is firmly in the realm of the individual and collective mind.
If we want to understand the phenomenon we have just witnessed we need to start studying carl Jung and his writings on the human mind and Mass Psychosis.
It was he who famously warned of the dangers of a Mass Psychosis outbreak (Psychic epidemic)
“Indeed, it is becoming ever more obvious that it is not famine, not earthquakes, not microbes, not cancer but man himself who is man’s greatest danger to man, for the simple reason that there is no adequate protection against psychic epidemics, which are infinitely more devastating than the worst of natural catastrophes.”
I think I'd be more likely to trust a used car salesman than anyone in the health establishment.
In N. Ireland during 4 years of a deadly pandemic 275 people died OF Covid, the youngest was 38. Source--the N.I Dept of Health from an FoI
Actually they died at the same rate as flu----except no one died of flu. Indeed our Health Minister was given a report which predicted....275 deaths, but he chose to use the worst case scenario in the report of 14,000 deaths when enforcing lockdowns.
For which the wef owned scumbag will never be held accountable for same as they all wont
It is, I suggest, in the public interest for you to name the alternative media outlet which declined to publish the fruits of your diligent and highly significant investigation into the Dumfries and Galloway deaths.
Social media has more than its share of "limited hangout" operators, as I (a former national newspaper journalist) have, discovered in seeking to interest so-called "independent" news purveyors in material which undermines the increasingly threadbare official pandemic narrative.
Publish and be damned!
UKCOLUMN. I have more Foi articles incoming. I wrote a stack last year. They also have point blank refused to cover ANY of the harrowing and important fopotage from the Scottish COVID inquiry.
That's interesting. I have been trying in vain to get UKCOLUMN to dig into what I call the Calamari Clots Cover-Up. And this despite me sending, some time ago, a detailed note on the subject, plus numerous links to relevant info and contacts, plus a suggested intro to the article and the offer of my free further help if they needed it. They completely ignored my initial email and when I wrote again to ask received some pretty feeble excuses. Only this morning, I sent them another email pointing to a new twist to the calamari clots story which would give them a chance to run something immediately based on no more than a single interview with John O'Looney, the UK the undertaker who has been trying for a year or more to interest the Establishment and mainstream media in the wealth of evidence has amassed on these strange, potentially lethal clots, and their contribution to the rising excess deaths toll.
As well as UKColumn (and a number of mainstream newspapers) I also contacted the Daily Sceptic (run by free speech advocate Toby Young) and sent them the same dossier - with - so far - the same disappointing outcome.
Makes you think, eh!
Yes, i've had no joy with Daily Sceptic with regards to covering Scottish COVID inquiry. Stunning an almost total blanket 'ban' on this whether by design or just some psychosis. Revealling all the same i thik as to the importance of what has been said and if those in the alternative media cannot grasp that it's embarassing.
Great work! Thank you for your efforts. This is a keeper for me as I live in the area.
This has to be the most concise, evidence-based review of what ACTUALLY happened during the plandemic that I have read. Fantastic work, and thank you so much for sharing this with all of us. We all must continue to resist and fight for OUR rights.
biologyphenom, do you know of Dr. JJ Couey.....he might be really interested in your findings....
Yes....that's right!!! Pls, contact him here..... https://stream.gigaohm.bio/home
or here...
https://substack.com/@gigaohmbiological
I will try and contact him, as well.... :)
Thanks
Good luck.... I just messaged him on his substack.... 🤞
They are the only health board to issue covid vax exemptions only a handful but the only health board to issue exemption certificates.
Can you provide any proof of that?
Yes, I can I will send it to you when I get back from holiday. I know this because I had to defend myself in court against charges of acting aggressive at my local vax centre. I did a lot of research and I proved myself to be innocent. If my memory serves me rightly there were only around 12 vax exemption certificates issued in the whole of Scotland!
Ok, thanks. Appreciate that!
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:4597af6b-ca84-4991-860f-7b8770825d6c
Interesting. I was denied an immunity certificate by local GPs even though I gave plasma on request for treatment purpose as I had documented after testing Covid antibodies. (3 day sore throat.)
It's a long story. I needed to attend a wedding in Austria but was never going to participate in the vaccine clinical trial.
I exchanged several letters with Sunak (my local MP) and the local GP practice who replied with the expected gutless BS. I missed the wedding.
Somebody had ordered that these certificates of immunity should not be granted.
Who? The MPs who granted themselves exemption from the co-erced vaccine trial?
Surely not?
My GP practice directed me to attend "My local vaccine centre" which was 12 miles away. I had antibody tests for my whole family (my wife had 2 experimental injections) me and my children didn't have any. We all had something we all were positive apart from my son who's result was "inconclusive". I contacted my MP & MSP raising my concerns and pointing out the damming evidence the were as much use as chocolate fireguards. My then MP has been in hospital with a spinal stroke since April. The MSP is a Dr! I believe anyone asking for an exemption were being intentionally discriminated as there wasn't anything in place. When I asked at the vaccine centre they'd never heard of it and tried to coerce me into taking it!
Hi Paul,
Try Debi Evans direct. I sent this to Charles Malet who forwarded it on.
https://open.substack.com/pub/thedailybeagle/p/mhra-monopoly-252?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=b7m4j
REPLY
Charles very kindly sent on your email. Wow, this is a dynamite article. Thank you so much for sending and I will be sending it across to Cheryl too.
A million thanks
Debi :)
I have heard rumblings about UKCN being a limited hangout but what they do cover is spot on.
All by 1 health area!
as an aside be aware the pandemic treaty IS coming back check out the james roguski substack for the details
Pandemic treaty is IRRELEVANT for Scoltand though. https://news.stv.tv/scotland/msps-vote-to-pass-legislation-on-emergency-covid-powers-which-will-give-scottish-government-ability-to-impose-lockdowns
Sarscov1 in Asia from 2002 to 2004 was highly lethal (30-50% of infections, although the exact figure is unknown).
As a result, the host died immediately along with Sarscov1, and the spread of infection was small.
On the other hand, virology believes that if it is highly infectious, it is less lethal because it cannot spread by killing the host.
In fact, the 2020 Phase Ⅰclinical trial report from Pfizer, which is full of fraud, shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people out of 1000.
This means that 993 out of 1000 people will be the same whether they are vaccinated or not.
It also shows that even if everyone is unvaccinated, the infection rate is 8 people out of 1000.
This is where the big problem lies [ the difference between RRR and ARR ].
Many doctors (not to mention laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by FDA, CDC, and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, all of whom are unvaccinated, and 1,000 of them become infected.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate RRR will be 90%.
However, even if all of them are unvaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate ARR will be abt. 0.1%.
This is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to an individual.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is never the RRR.
There is a definition formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Calculation site https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/how-to-calculate-risk/
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people are vaccinated, even people who should not have experienced side effects will suffer from them.
In some cases, people who would not have died without being infected will die from side effects.
However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV also promote the relative effectiveness rate RRR,
and continue to mislead people into thinking that the probability that an individual can avoid infection is RRR.
The reason for this can only be either lack of knowledge or intentional selling for money.
Below are the results of my numerical calculations from several clinical trial documents.
Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
SK-Zooster (Shingrix) (shingles) ARR = 0.9%, RRR 94.2%
Meiji Replicon (Sarscov2) ARR = 0.5%, RRR = 95.5% (also a gene therapy drug)
Sequirus Flucelvax® Quad (for infulenzaA,B) ARR = 17.5%, RRR = 51.9%
However, Placebo was administered with meningococcal ACWY instead of saline.
In short, it was a fraudulent clinical trial, and all we can say is that Flucelvax is more effective against influenza than ACWY.
GSK's Arexvy (RSV) ARR = 0.26%, RRR = 82.5%
Moderna's mRNA-1345 (RSV) ARR = 0.53%, RRR = 68.4% (This is also a gene therapy drug)
Gardasil: HPV uninfected: ARR = 0.7%, RRR ≒ 50%
Gardasil: HPV already infected: ARR = 3.07%, RRR ≒ 70%
Gardasil contains the neurotoxin ALuminum at 416±75μg/dose
https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/metal-analysis-by-icp-ms.html
However, it is known that administering a vaccine for a disease when you are infected HPV can actually be harmful.
In the case of Gardasil, you should be tested to see if you are already infected or not before administering it.
However, the authorities do not make this mandatory, and I feel that they are being malicious.