Covid was artificially made into a death sentence for many people going through the hospital system. As soon as they were given that diagnosis the medical and nursing staff had to administer treatment per covid protocols and this for many involved heavy sedation and no antibiotics, add in neglect plus deprive them of life sustaining fluids and you have the perfect quick killing script. The staff were encouraged to accept that "covid" was a death sentence, if they are told that covid is deadly then it can become a self fulfilling prophecy through their actions or lack of actions. Very distressing to read, one can only imagine the horrors experienced for patients and relatives. This being ignored by mainstream and alternative media has to be intentional, they make sure the public's attention is drawn away from the horrors of the covid inquiry where the relatives are speaking in excruciating detail of the tortures that went on in our hospital system.
''This being ignored by mainstream and alternative media has to be intentional.''
-Yip, no other conclusion really. Ulterior motives all over the place. If people can't unite with common ground over this they won't unite against anything.
Harrowing for families and their loved ones . My mums experience was was shocking. Vulnerable 81 yrs old I'll health more so since 2 jabs . Last time in hospital this year she developed delirium out of nowhere where . The treatment of her was horrific. I had to threaten them that if they put her on any induced coma or DNR I would sue the arse off them !! She lost over a stone in weight in 10 days !!!! Came out with a chunk on skin ripped off her wrist !!! That had to be treated for months at home !! She was covered in bruises . The swore blind never gave her any other meds , med charts checked but my mum is terrified and never wants to go to hospital again 😥. She is of the age doesn't want any fuss so would not let me access her full medical notes. This was now ....so back when "Covid" hysteria closed all family safe guarding down families were unable to monitor and the horror of what was happening is now being seen 😞 😭
Where is the outrage, the campaigns to email MPs etc? Tumbleweed. REAL documented ''assisted dying'' they look the other way. Possible FUTURE ''assisted dying''=take action NOW!!
It's truly head slapping stunning to listen to some of these people testify about the brutalities that were forced upon their loved ones yet still accept the fundamental lie that 'covid' is a real biological phenomenon. It feels and sounds like a spell has been cast upon them and no matter how much they know about the concrete details of the murder they will still defer to the belief that an invisible spirit was floating around making people sick.
In the first video the woman says based off her conversation from someone in the US that steroids were being used in the US and while that did happen in some places that was not common- the protocols/treatments (midazolam, propofol, fentanyl, vents, neglect, unilateral DNR's etc.) were virtually the same from one Western nation to the next- "harmonized" as the ghouls say.
When the video was added to Twitter the lady testifying did not even repost only liked and i was blocked by the care home relatives scotland group. Something sinister afoot.
Hi Iain, many thanks for the compliment. I have absolutely NO IDEA why i was banned. I never swear etc i simply ''call out'' some 'awake' and 'alt' media people out over their failure to cover the inquiry and more often than not they do not like it. I've contacted X several times as to the specific reason no response. I 'broke the rules.' I'm done with the X platform and wouldn't go back anyway. cheers https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newsuspended-from-xtwitter?utm_source=publication-search
The Majority of people will always follow orders - they lack the independence of mind and courage to question them. I think this is probably hard-wired into our DNA, because if everybody questioned everything all of the time then nothing would work - the trains would not run on time, and most people would just chuck in their Mini-Mac-jobs and walk away. The social order gives stability and structure - its a safety blanket, because post- Feudal, and post- Industrial-era, people gave up their independent minds in favour of willing slavery - you know, taxes, mortgage, job, national service, BBC license, religion, all that crap.
All fair points, and well said. However, I disagree.
Rather than allow the State to take my life at its whim, this Bill actually puts me in charge of the location, means, and time of my own death. Now, I currently am healthy, but my dog is not, and next week I shall be calling for the vet. I know that her life is nearly ended, and that she is in terminal pain, and I think this is the right call. I only hope that when my time comes, my fellow citizens - family and doctor - give me the same right to dignity and a peaceful death. A quick bullet in the back of the head would suit me fine - I'm not precious about it.
Agreed. And what the vast majority of supporters fail to grasp is that for every individual 'spared' suffering at end-of-life by choosing AS, thousands of elderly, disabled, and mentally ill patients will be denied further treatment and social care support in order to 'convince' (coerce) them into 'opting' to end their lives prematurely.
It's a very selfish, 'me, me, me' position to take.
For you - maybe. For me, well - that might be my choice, and you can get lost - if I choose to end my life in my own time, that has nothing to do with you, so please get off my case.
As an experienced NHS hospital manager, I know that bereaved relatives - in extreme distress - often clutch at false straws like this:
"The family feels it is likely that an unvaccinated nurse, who also then tested positive, caught Covid-19 from the other patient and passed it to her father.’’
I recall back in the 1980's spending 3 hours from 4pm to 7pm - (well after I should have been home having my dinner) just listening to - and trying to empathise with - a distressed woman who was convinced that her parent had been murdered by nursing staff who left a window open on a warm day! I suspect most NHS managers and nurses have heard similar stories over the years.
I'm picking up many patterns from these testimonies, many of which are not unique to the Covid era, but relate to chronic and systemic NHS failings over decades.
That is not to say that I am not utterly horrified by hearing abut them - as we should all be, but trying to sort the wheat from the chaff can be very stressful and tiring for all those concerned.
None of the above will change my view that dying people should have far more control and influence on the location, timing and means of their own deaths, by the way.
The politicians were lying, the media were lying, public health were lying, the NHS were clearly lying in half empty wards in 2020 then promoting something safe and effective and now the families are lying? So who was telling the truth? On ''assisted dying'' given the last few years it's very naive to think this is anything but opening the floodgates to avoidable deaths as we've seen in Canada and that is why i would oppose it even though i do agree with your last sentence. Wee video for you Rob. Cheers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz3lS9neWb8
I don't think that "now the families are lying" is behind RK's observations about how some relatives 'clutch at straws', trying to rationalise how a family member could have died, especially when it wasn't expected. It is a very human response looking for something or someone to blame because the loss is so great.
It was compassionate nursing to sit with the distressed relative, which has not been the case for so many relatives as has been reported at the Inquiries.
There are very many dedicated nurses, doctors, ancillary staff in the NHS, but we don't really hear their experiences, or the differences they have made to many a patient's and relative's life during the 'Covid-19' episode. It is the 'headline' stuff that grabs attention ( eg, tik tok dances), the ill treatment by some medical staff to those in their care, or, how elderly people in care homes had to talk through glass to say 'hello' to sons, daughters.
There were nurses I met who were vehement adherents of the 'covid' protocols, enabling the indifferent treatment to the individual, not caring how their behaviour impacted their own family members. Slavish group thinkers. There appear to be too many of that ilk giving testament.
My point was-what is the truth of 'COVID' if everyone is lying? I think what you refer to at the end is ''just following orders''. I know a few nurses that told me it was all BS and then there was someone i know locally trying to scare me about how unjabbed young people were in ICU due to COVID. I checked the stats at the time, total lies. They were clearly given briefs on how to interact with the public.
Initially, I think that’s fair. But not for long. I personally know some doctors who both follow me and have even said thank you, yet are still jabbing your children & mine, while keeping themselves & their kids well clear and trousering the incentive payments,
For the last few years, I have been registering increasing use of a new wokish terminology - no longer THE truth, but, MY truth.
Obviously, if I were a brutal person in a position of ultra-power, I would chuck a bereaved relative out of my office after she had been talking shite for the last hour of so, but my son: "With power, comes not just great responsibility, but also accountability', and telling a delusional and grief-stricken recently bereaved person to 'find the car park' tends to have career-damaging consequences - as indeed does standing up to a senior Hospital Consultant - who is talking similar shite, but in fancier language !
It’s beyond question that large numbers of people were murdered in hospitals and care homes during the non existent long planned fake pandemic.
Midazolam and morphine are contraindicated used together in the absence of intense monitoring. In care homes, non medical staff were encouraged to inject their charges.
Mechanical ventilation is an inappropriate intervention in the frail elderly as it often rapidly kills many people so treated.
This is in addition to administering “run, death is near” (remdesivir).
Mike, I tend to fall back on the owlish and legalistic approach to this - in other words I think you have a powerful case to make, but until defended in a court of law, it is no more than an allegation of impropriety. It's also a tricky case to pursue - in my experience doctors nearly always stick together and argue that their treatments were best practice at the time - that they were following recommended practice - and with powerful vested interests an representation at the highest levels of government, no court will convict unless the murder was of an absolutely egregious and blatant nature. We also have the Lucy Letby case to consider - a salutory lesson for anyone who cares about justice and the law. Its one hell of an uphill battle - ranks will close as tight as a ducks nether orifice.
Assisted suicide is not about giving " 'dying' people more control and influence, on the location, timing, and means of their own deaths"; it's about handing control and influence to the State to decide the time and manner of your passing. Want a bespoke death? Best arrange it yourself, the State won't be giving you one.
In vitually every one of the 160 cases known to me, there was always a culprit/s. They were usually medics who arrogantly knew what was best for our loved ones, even if that meant withdrawing treatment and sustenance. I will not repeat myself again, but as you clearly didn't read my post properly, our loved ones were NOT DYING, NOT AT END OF LIFE!
My elderly uncle in Munich - sadly living alone as his wife had terminal dementia and was in a nursing home - did just that. He took his own life, using some carefully planned means - presumably privately purchased drugs. It seems sad to me that he died alone, but it was his choice not to bother anyone else - I mean he has three very capable children, but he chose not to burden them with holding his hand.
This is exactly the kind of attitude I have come to expect from hospital managers and NHS apologists.
"Clutching at straws", you say... really? Testimony after testimony from families whose loved ones were not dying, but were fast-tracked to their graves on the back of highly subjective EoL prognoses with no clinical justification, and the inappropriate application of end-of-life protocols.
Hundreds of cases, all saying the same thing. You're dead right: there are patterns, and they all point to death by inaction and death by design. Had I not refused to accept my mother was 'dying', she would have died in 2019, 3.5 years before she did. Didn't stop the NHS repeating the same baseless argument that she was dying in February 2021, September 2021 and November 2021.
See the pattern? My story is far from unique, we are aware of many similar cases. These relatives survived because their families "clutched at straws" and reversed these ageist, discriminatory decisions. For every one of us who got loved ones off the death pathway, there are thousands who were not so lucky.
I think you missed my point, Amanda, which was compassionate, not dismissive. Perhaps you could do me the courtesy of re-reading my post. There is no easy way to say this, but the emotional pain of loss is such that the bereaved sometimes spend a lifetime looking for a culprit, rather than a closure.
Yes without a doubt Scottish COVID Inquiry and even lately UK COVID inquiry are under a media embargo and even when has been reported it is often very sparingly with so many crucial details missing it beggars belief! Only lately has the UKCV19 inquiry caught upto Scottish in many areas. Watch out for upcoming extended compilation of the module 3 closing statements. I hope this proves as popular as my Scottish clips all those months ago. In the meantime see this. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-26-nov-2024-260
Sure doesn’t feel like. Recent eg- blocked by Sonia Elijah for making the point why no articles on other inquiry evidence past 18 months vs her latest module 4 vaccine which is the ONLY coverage of the inquiry from her. As i say in my substacks the people that care, like, share and comment on the info i post. THAT’S what matters most. And why did Together posts fall off a cliff on Scots inquiry just as it was really getting to the truth? i’m happy to provide footage for their Youtube etc
I explained all this before, Dave. They went off a cliff because:
- We are a tiny team (only two half-time volunteers doing social media from the Together account)
- because I was the only one highlighting and reposting them (from my personal account) in the first place, and had to fight to get Together to post your stuff - not because they are not interested but because they are a tiny team juggling multiple campaigns.
- because I am supposed to have a team of people (that I recruited myself) supposedly dedicated to raising these issues and helping with Social media (from the Families Against Involuntary Medical Euthanasia account) but most of whom, apart from Fiona, don't lift a damned finger.
If I had my own Together SM account, your stuff would have been up there everyday, (with Fiona's help). I can't be writing reports, press releases, dealing with media, doing advocacy work with wounded families, writing up case dossiers. I have three (now four with Assisted Suicide Bill) Together campaigns to juggle. I am one person. Not an army. I have huge respect for all you are doing, but I feel this comment is unfair. You can't imagine the battle I've had to get anything posted. It's a question of resources, no other reason. Hope it's clear now.
Thank you, David, for sharing your harrowing story. Would you give me permission to add your testimony to our dossier of cases? I'd really like to interview you about this, especially in light of your comments on the connection between these protocols and the assisted suicide Bill. You can contact me by email: eolwatch@gmail.com (email account for FAIME)
Amanda Hunter
Chair of Health and Social Care at the Together Declaration
Co-founder of Families Against Involuntary Medical Euthanasia
Thank you, David. We are separate groups. I work with the Together Declaration as well as running my own campaign on this. Please email me at eolwatch@gmail.com, to arrange a time to call you. Thanks.
Covid was artificially made into a death sentence for many people going through the hospital system. As soon as they were given that diagnosis the medical and nursing staff had to administer treatment per covid protocols and this for many involved heavy sedation and no antibiotics, add in neglect plus deprive them of life sustaining fluids and you have the perfect quick killing script. The staff were encouraged to accept that "covid" was a death sentence, if they are told that covid is deadly then it can become a self fulfilling prophecy through their actions or lack of actions. Very distressing to read, one can only imagine the horrors experienced for patients and relatives. This being ignored by mainstream and alternative media has to be intentional, they make sure the public's attention is drawn away from the horrors of the covid inquiry where the relatives are speaking in excruciating detail of the tortures that went on in our hospital system.
''This being ignored by mainstream and alternative media has to be intentional.''
-Yip, no other conclusion really. Ulterior motives all over the place. If people can't unite with common ground over this they won't unite against anything.
Harrowing for families and their loved ones . My mums experience was was shocking. Vulnerable 81 yrs old I'll health more so since 2 jabs . Last time in hospital this year she developed delirium out of nowhere where . The treatment of her was horrific. I had to threaten them that if they put her on any induced coma or DNR I would sue the arse off them !! She lost over a stone in weight in 10 days !!!! Came out with a chunk on skin ripped off her wrist !!! That had to be treated for months at home !! She was covered in bruises . The swore blind never gave her any other meds , med charts checked but my mum is terrified and never wants to go to hospital again 😥. She is of the age doesn't want any fuss so would not let me access her full medical notes. This was now ....so back when "Covid" hysteria closed all family safe guarding down families were unable to monitor and the horror of what was happening is now being seen 😞 😭
Horriffic Kirst. Thanks for sharing. Stories like this are equally as important.
Further verification of the Midazolam murders.
Drugs forcefully given without consent.
Excuses invented for trying to explain why they have violated consent.
Where is the outrage, the campaigns to email MPs etc? Tumbleweed. REAL documented ''assisted dying'' they look the other way. Possible FUTURE ''assisted dying''=take action NOW!!
https://www.hartgroup.org/the-assisted-dying-bill-in-the-uk/
It's truly head slapping stunning to listen to some of these people testify about the brutalities that were forced upon their loved ones yet still accept the fundamental lie that 'covid' is a real biological phenomenon. It feels and sounds like a spell has been cast upon them and no matter how much they know about the concrete details of the murder they will still defer to the belief that an invisible spirit was floating around making people sick.
In the first video the woman says based off her conversation from someone in the US that steroids were being used in the US and while that did happen in some places that was not common- the protocols/treatments (midazolam, propofol, fentanyl, vents, neglect, unilateral DNR's etc.) were virtually the same from one Western nation to the next- "harmonized" as the ghouls say.
When the video was added to Twitter the lady testifying did not even repost only liked and i was blocked by the care home relatives scotland group. Something sinister afoot.
I think you are doing a great service highlighting parts of the Covid enquiry. If you don’t mind me asking are you permanently banned from X?
Hi Iain, many thanks for the compliment. I have absolutely NO IDEA why i was banned. I never swear etc i simply ''call out'' some 'awake' and 'alt' media people out over their failure to cover the inquiry and more often than not they do not like it. I've contacted X several times as to the specific reason no response. I 'broke the rules.' I'm done with the X platform and wouldn't go back anyway. cheers https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newsuspended-from-xtwitter?utm_source=publication-search
We must fight on
The Majority of people will always follow orders - they lack the independence of mind and courage to question them. I think this is probably hard-wired into our DNA, because if everybody questioned everything all of the time then nothing would work - the trains would not run on time, and most people would just chuck in their Mini-Mac-jobs and walk away. The social order gives stability and structure - its a safety blanket, because post- Feudal, and post- Industrial-era, people gave up their independent minds in favour of willing slavery - you know, taxes, mortgage, job, national service, BBC license, religion, all that crap.
All fair points, and well said. However, I disagree.
Rather than allow the State to take my life at its whim, this Bill actually puts me in charge of the location, means, and time of my own death. Now, I currently am healthy, but my dog is not, and next week I shall be calling for the vet. I know that her life is nearly ended, and that she is in terminal pain, and I think this is the right call. I only hope that when my time comes, my fellow citizens - family and doctor - give me the same right to dignity and a peaceful death. A quick bullet in the back of the head would suit me fine - I'm not precious about it.
There is no dignity in euthanasia only pain
Agreed. And what the vast majority of supporters fail to grasp is that for every individual 'spared' suffering at end-of-life by choosing AS, thousands of elderly, disabled, and mentally ill patients will be denied further treatment and social care support in order to 'convince' (coerce) them into 'opting' to end their lives prematurely.
It's a very selfish, 'me, me, me' position to take.
For you - maybe. For me, well - that might be my choice, and you can get lost - if I choose to end my life in my own time, that has nothing to do with you, so please get off my case.
As an experienced NHS hospital manager, I know that bereaved relatives - in extreme distress - often clutch at false straws like this:
"The family feels it is likely that an unvaccinated nurse, who also then tested positive, caught Covid-19 from the other patient and passed it to her father.’’
I recall back in the 1980's spending 3 hours from 4pm to 7pm - (well after I should have been home having my dinner) just listening to - and trying to empathise with - a distressed woman who was convinced that her parent had been murdered by nursing staff who left a window open on a warm day! I suspect most NHS managers and nurses have heard similar stories over the years.
I'm picking up many patterns from these testimonies, many of which are not unique to the Covid era, but relate to chronic and systemic NHS failings over decades.
That is not to say that I am not utterly horrified by hearing abut them - as we should all be, but trying to sort the wheat from the chaff can be very stressful and tiring for all those concerned.
None of the above will change my view that dying people should have far more control and influence on the location, timing and means of their own deaths, by the way.
The politicians were lying, the media were lying, public health were lying, the NHS were clearly lying in half empty wards in 2020 then promoting something safe and effective and now the families are lying? So who was telling the truth? On ''assisted dying'' given the last few years it's very naive to think this is anything but opening the floodgates to avoidable deaths as we've seen in Canada and that is why i would oppose it even though i do agree with your last sentence. Wee video for you Rob. Cheers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz3lS9neWb8
I don't think that "now the families are lying" is behind RK's observations about how some relatives 'clutch at straws', trying to rationalise how a family member could have died, especially when it wasn't expected. It is a very human response looking for something or someone to blame because the loss is so great.
It was compassionate nursing to sit with the distressed relative, which has not been the case for so many relatives as has been reported at the Inquiries.
There are very many dedicated nurses, doctors, ancillary staff in the NHS, but we don't really hear their experiences, or the differences they have made to many a patient's and relative's life during the 'Covid-19' episode. It is the 'headline' stuff that grabs attention ( eg, tik tok dances), the ill treatment by some medical staff to those in their care, or, how elderly people in care homes had to talk through glass to say 'hello' to sons, daughters.
There were nurses I met who were vehement adherents of the 'covid' protocols, enabling the indifferent treatment to the individual, not caring how their behaviour impacted their own family members. Slavish group thinkers. There appear to be too many of that ilk giving testament.
My point was-what is the truth of 'COVID' if everyone is lying? I think what you refer to at the end is ''just following orders''. I know a few nurses that told me it was all BS and then there was someone i know locally trying to scare me about how unjabbed young people were in ICU due to COVID. I checked the stats at the time, total lies. They were clearly given briefs on how to interact with the public.
I seem to have missed the point.....but, not everyone is lying.
There is lying, for profit or status, and there is just getting it wrong. Most people just got it wrong.
Initially, I think that’s fair. But not for long. I personally know some doctors who both follow me and have even said thank you, yet are still jabbing your children & mine, while keeping themselves & their kids well clear and trousering the incentive payments,
For the last few years, I have been registering increasing use of a new wokish terminology - no longer THE truth, but, MY truth.
Obviously, if I were a brutal person in a position of ultra-power, I would chuck a bereaved relative out of my office after she had been talking shite for the last hour of so, but my son: "With power, comes not just great responsibility, but also accountability', and telling a delusional and grief-stricken recently bereaved person to 'find the car park' tends to have career-damaging consequences - as indeed does standing up to a senior Hospital Consultant - who is talking similar shite, but in fancier language !
Rob,
It’s beyond question that large numbers of people were murdered in hospitals and care homes during the non existent long planned fake pandemic.
Midazolam and morphine are contraindicated used together in the absence of intense monitoring. In care homes, non medical staff were encouraged to inject their charges.
Mechanical ventilation is an inappropriate intervention in the frail elderly as it often rapidly kills many people so treated.
This is in addition to administering “run, death is near” (remdesivir).
Best wishes
Mike
Mike, I tend to fall back on the owlish and legalistic approach to this - in other words I think you have a powerful case to make, but until defended in a court of law, it is no more than an allegation of impropriety. It's also a tricky case to pursue - in my experience doctors nearly always stick together and argue that their treatments were best practice at the time - that they were following recommended practice - and with powerful vested interests an representation at the highest levels of government, no court will convict unless the murder was of an absolutely egregious and blatant nature. We also have the Lucy Letby case to consider - a salutory lesson for anyone who cares about justice and the law. Its one hell of an uphill battle - ranks will close as tight as a ducks nether orifice.
Assisted suicide is not about giving " 'dying' people more control and influence, on the location, timing, and means of their own deaths"; it's about handing control and influence to the State to decide the time and manner of your passing. Want a bespoke death? Best arrange it yourself, the State won't be giving you one.
Here is some ‘‘assisted dying’’ that should have 10 million views.
https://substack.com/@scottishcovidinquiry/note/c-87357605
In vitually every one of the 160 cases known to me, there was always a culprit/s. They were usually medics who arrogantly knew what was best for our loved ones, even if that meant withdrawing treatment and sustenance. I will not repeat myself again, but as you clearly didn't read my post properly, our loved ones were NOT DYING, NOT AT END OF LIFE!
My elderly uncle in Munich - sadly living alone as his wife had terminal dementia and was in a nursing home - did just that. He took his own life, using some carefully planned means - presumably privately purchased drugs. It seems sad to me that he died alone, but it was his choice not to bother anyone else - I mean he has three very capable children, but he chose not to burden them with holding his hand.
I don't have any easy answers.
This is exactly the kind of attitude I have come to expect from hospital managers and NHS apologists.
"Clutching at straws", you say... really? Testimony after testimony from families whose loved ones were not dying, but were fast-tracked to their graves on the back of highly subjective EoL prognoses with no clinical justification, and the inappropriate application of end-of-life protocols.
Hundreds of cases, all saying the same thing. You're dead right: there are patterns, and they all point to death by inaction and death by design. Had I not refused to accept my mother was 'dying', she would have died in 2019, 3.5 years before she did. Didn't stop the NHS repeating the same baseless argument that she was dying in February 2021, September 2021 and November 2021.
See the pattern? My story is far from unique, we are aware of many similar cases. These relatives survived because their families "clutched at straws" and reversed these ageist, discriminatory decisions. For every one of us who got loved ones off the death pathway, there are thousands who were not so lucky.
I think you missed my point, Amanda, which was compassionate, not dismissive. Perhaps you could do me the courtesy of re-reading my post. There is no easy way to say this, but the emotional pain of loss is such that the bereaved sometimes spend a lifetime looking for a culprit, rather than a closure.
Thanks for sharing all that David, truly shocking. It's important these stories are told to the public and sadly i am reading far too many of them.
Yes without a doubt Scottish COVID Inquiry and even lately UK COVID inquiry are under a media embargo and even when has been reported it is often very sparingly with so many crucial details missing it beggars belief! Only lately has the UKCV19 inquiry caught upto Scottish in many areas. Watch out for upcoming extended compilation of the module 3 closing statements. I hope this proves as popular as my Scottish clips all those months ago. In the meantime see this. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-26-nov-2024-260
Thank you, Dave, for all your tireless and amazing work exposing the truth. You are a national hero. Thank you!
Sure doesn’t feel like. Recent eg- blocked by Sonia Elijah for making the point why no articles on other inquiry evidence past 18 months vs her latest module 4 vaccine which is the ONLY coverage of the inquiry from her. As i say in my substacks the people that care, like, share and comment on the info i post. THAT’S what matters most. And why did Together posts fall off a cliff on Scots inquiry just as it was really getting to the truth? i’m happy to provide footage for their Youtube etc
I explained all this before, Dave. They went off a cliff because:
- We are a tiny team (only two half-time volunteers doing social media from the Together account)
- because I was the only one highlighting and reposting them (from my personal account) in the first place, and had to fight to get Together to post your stuff - not because they are not interested but because they are a tiny team juggling multiple campaigns.
- because I am supposed to have a team of people (that I recruited myself) supposedly dedicated to raising these issues and helping with Social media (from the Families Against Involuntary Medical Euthanasia account) but most of whom, apart from Fiona, don't lift a damned finger.
If I had my own Together SM account, your stuff would have been up there everyday, (with Fiona's help). I can't be writing reports, press releases, dealing with media, doing advocacy work with wounded families, writing up case dossiers. I have three (now four with Assisted Suicide Bill) Together campaigns to juggle. I am one person. Not an army. I have huge respect for all you are doing, but I feel this comment is unfair. You can't imagine the battle I've had to get anything posted. It's a question of resources, no other reason. Hope it's clear now.
Never trust hospitals now ,not safe .🤨
Thank you, David, for sharing your harrowing story. Would you give me permission to add your testimony to our dossier of cases? I'd really like to interview you about this, especially in light of your comments on the connection between these protocols and the assisted suicide Bill. You can contact me by email: eolwatch@gmail.com (email account for FAIME)
Amanda Hunter
Chair of Health and Social Care at the Together Declaration
Co-founder of Families Against Involuntary Medical Euthanasia
Co-founder of Unlock Care Homes
Thank you, David. We are separate groups. I work with the Together Declaration as well as running my own campaign on this. Please email me at eolwatch@gmail.com, to arrange a time to call you. Thanks.