Prof Martin Neil:Scottish COVID Inquiry
Discussing the 'COVID pandemic.'
Introduction
A superb interview on all things ‘COVID’ with Professors Neil and Fenton.
I understandably have particular focus on Prof Neil’s comments around the Scottish COVID Inquiry. The world’s only official COVID inquiry to reveal the sheer scale of horrors inflicted by government lockdown policies. To this day the inquiry has been largely ignored by the mainstream media (some early sporadic reporting) and even most of the ‘alternative’ media, with a few exceptions.
So what caused ‘with COVID’ mortality?
Inhuman treatment of the elderly
DNRs
Withdrawal of anti-biotics
Crushing isolation
Overuse of opioids
Ventilators
‘‘Primarilly the elderly and vulnerable had a treatment regime imposed on them which essentially was inhuman…
..Alot of this has come out publicly at the Scottish COVID inquiry.’’
I highly recommend watching the full video and to check out the Professors new book ‘‘Fighting Goliath’’ which i purchased yesterday. Give
and a follow on substack and on X.My thanks to Professor Neil for speaking out on this absolutley crucial issue and how the evidence revealled SO FAR in Scotland is damning to the official narrative.
End
Links:
Full video-Youtube-British Thought Leaders
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iatrogenesis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senicide
NG163 is nothing less than Crimes against humanity!!
Using Midazolam and Morphine is a painful disgusting murder and they did it on people that could not say no ie the disabled and elderly
This is mass murder to bring in a deadly patented bio-weapon, the Mrna Vaxx
The fact no big account refuses to discuss speaks volumes
One wonders if Oliver, N (because he is Scottish and his 'voice' would resonate more with his 'own' people) has had a warning from 'shadow merchants'...comment on the Inquiry and your channel gets the 'silent treatment', or, other sanctions. It does seem strange that he has not done a whole podcast about it - the Inquiry in Scotland is a very rich seam for evidence and personal stories. This is not in defence of the omission, but to understand his raison d'etre.