Whilst people continue to age and eventually die, after a period of high deaths from so called pandemics, or wars, there should be a reduction after, which is not evident in all highly covid countries.
Yes. Looking at NRS data historically in severe mortality events eg; 'Spanish flu'/world war 1 and 2 death rates always returned to normal/even much lower levels to those previously experienced once over. This has clearly NOT been the case since the 'COVID pandemic' which are remaining high. Almost as high now as in 2020. https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/publications/deaths-time-series-data-2024/
Re Spanish Flu - I have been reading early 20thC literature and many of the writers from that period record a bad flu after WW1.
However, I am not convinced by some of the theories going rounds the internet about Spanish flu, because it is clear from reading these memoirs that pneumonia was what killed people. Those who survived were debilitated for months afterwards, and "you just struggled to breathe for about a month"
We forget how many people in those days suffered with bronchitis - it was very usual.
Lung diseases were common as people lived in damp cold inadequately heated homes with coal fires.
We forget the enormous changes that antibiotics created and how many people they saved.
Well if you go back in NRS records there were 64,000 deaths in 1993 (-700,000 less scots v 2020) but it was pretty much in decline from thereon in down to 54,000 in 2013 going up again again to 58,00 before 2020 and since them the death rates and excess deaths are unprecedented. The 2025 figures should be a massive story in media but won't be.
I have booked a burial plot. The idea of cremation never appealed. Today's BBC R4 PM news features some chap who did not apparently cremate bodies. I pay scant attention. I never for one moment bought into covid1984, not because I studied tables or figures. I just didn't buy into. Gut feeling? Where do table figures come from? How reliable are they? Sadly, I just assume the state pedals codswallop.
It seems that someone believes that cremation is going to be a growth industry. The fact that 7 facilities have been added in the last 10 years indicates that, plus the rising percentage of cremation to deaths. I suspect that % also shows a change in how younger generations process their dead ~ less formal burials and fuss, cremation is cheaper maybe too. That said, the real stat is the total deaths column. Is that from some other official database, and does it check out? There looks to be around 57,000 deaths average before 2020. So, all things considered, Scotland is still higher than the historic trend, and especially in light of the dry tinder effect we should have seen post-covid, where deaths ebb markedly.
I agree deaths are still trending at least 3,000 more annually than you would expect. I linked to NRS data for all cause deaths calculations for 2025. You can do this by adding up the monthly or weekly mortality totals which differ slightly but not much.
NRS estimates that there will be a fall of almost 80,000 in the number of children aged 0-15 between 2022 and 2047. It’s also projecting a fall of more than 57,000 in people aged 16 to 29. While NRS does project an increase of more than 144,000 30- to 59-year-olds, it still leaves Scotland with more people of pension age than it's ever had before and a working-age population slightly smaller than it is today.
Yeah i knew about this. The NRS dashboard is very revealing. Goto 'Change by age group' There is a menu 'projection variant' you can select the dif scenarios inc 'replacement fertility.'
''The number of people aged 75 and over is projected to increase by 300,700 over the 25 years to mid-2049. Meanwhile, the number of children (aged 0 to 15) and young adults (aged 16 to 29) are both projected to fall over the same period, by 165,900 and 157,500 respectively.''
I have been thinking about all this. The tone of the reporting on the national population projections site does not suggest this is a surprise to them. It looks more like a planned, phased population reduction with some immigrant replacement.
The thing is that the native population is skilled, the immigrants less so. You cannot just randomly eliminate swathes of skilled workers without dramatic losses to industry and essential services.
There are also specialist skilled people and teams who cannot be replaced at all under about a decade of training and experience of working together - some specialist medical teams are like this.. What will happen when these interdependent skills disappear because one essential member in a complex interlocking structure has been unpredictably lost at an early age?
I wonder whether the toxic lots were targeted at certain demographics and districts.
There were rumours that the injection deployment was helped by the use of AI.
You would need to achieve this unless you want to wipe out the entire professional middle class. An essential class. Does that sound like a desirable goal?
I used to belong to a Reddit lockdownsceptics group and there was a Scottish lady there who said she lived in a very depressed working class/unemployed village in Scotland. The deaths and strokes in her village were numerous according to her. We all wondered if her village had been targeted.
The effect of these losses on society will soon become evident.
'The tone of the reporting on the national population projections site does not suggest this is a surprise to them. It looks more like a planned, phased population reduction with some immigrant replacement.'
-Agree. Because there is no concern shown either by NRS, 'public 'health' or our politicians you can then only conclude this is a plan being successfully executed.
The reason there are over 60,000 deaths for the sixth year in a row is probably because of the baby boomer bust. This was the 'window of opportunity' UN/WEF were talking about.
They could use this to pretend something invisible, new and deadly was going around.
All of this was expected and discussed in the 1990's then everyone suddenly stopped talking about it.
'Scotland’s population is projected to start falling earlier than previously suggested, according to the latest population projections from National Records of Scotland. '
'Scotland’s population is undergoing unprecedented change, according to new analysis from National Records of Scotland (NRS). 'Births and the fertility rate are at an all-time low and for the ninth year in a row there were more deaths than births in 2024.'
I often promote the website by Sally Clark, an Australian, who lives in the Philippines.
She has been collating and analysing death and fertility statistics for Asia, Australia, Japan Taiwan and the Philippines.
Her work is high quality. The Asian statistics may be less manipulated to hide deaths than the statistics in the USA and Europe.
My impression is that the real impact is on fertility. Some of her countries have lost 25-50% fertility in five years, 5% each year and it is continuing at this rate.
Deaths are about 10-15% elevated after the unprecedented highs of 2021-2 and static at that level.
Thanks. Since 2024 stats agencies in the UK decided to use new modelling to calculate excess deaths rather than the 5 year average which of course the new method normalises the measurement. Here is a good overview of it all by Freedom Podcast.
Why do you consider, 64,461 deaths in 2025 significantly more than the 64,000 odd in 2020? The increase of less than 400 represents an increase of less than 1 percent. This is well within the range of normal variability.
I don't believe i said 'significantly more' only more. Regardless to be experiencing MORE deaths in 2025 that at ANY time during 'the pandemic' period is quite shocking. None of this is normal.
Another big critic influencer account ''exposing the darkness'' afaik has supported nothing i have posted in 3 years when i have ACTUALLY been exposing the darkness. As for Edward Dowd a former Blackrock execxutive not exactly someone i would trust. You might instead be better listening to and promoting the views of real everyday people.
Whilst people continue to age and eventually die, after a period of high deaths from so called pandemics, or wars, there should be a reduction after, which is not evident in all highly covid countries.
Yes. Looking at NRS data historically in severe mortality events eg; 'Spanish flu'/world war 1 and 2 death rates always returned to normal/even much lower levels to those previously experienced once over. This has clearly NOT been the case since the 'COVID pandemic' which are remaining high. Almost as high now as in 2020. https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/publications/deaths-time-series-data-2024/
Not only do death rates usually return to normal, but human fertility rapidly replaces any losses.
There is a psychological need to rebuild after deaths by bringing new people into the world.
In fact it is often remarked that a death in a family coincides with a birth.
The persistent reduction in fertility is unprecedented and shows something has changed.
I just had an update from cremation society and all cause mortality for 2025 relayed to them by NRS. See table!
Your work is excellent, BP. Well done for all the hard work.
Appreciated.
Re Spanish Flu - I have been reading early 20thC literature and many of the writers from that period record a bad flu after WW1.
However, I am not convinced by some of the theories going rounds the internet about Spanish flu, because it is clear from reading these memoirs that pneumonia was what killed people. Those who survived were debilitated for months afterwards, and "you just struggled to breathe for about a month"
We forget how many people in those days suffered with bronchitis - it was very usual.
Lung diseases were common as people lived in damp cold inadequately heated homes with coal fires.
We forget the enormous changes that antibiotics created and how many people they saved.
I just had an update from cremation society and all cause mortality for 2025 relayed to them by NRS. See table!
The total deaths from the year 2000 on never reached 60,000 until 2020. It has remained above that since. Telling.
Well if you go back in NRS records there were 64,000 deaths in 1993 (-700,000 less scots v 2020) but it was pretty much in decline from thereon in down to 54,000 in 2013 going up again again to 58,00 before 2020 and since them the death rates and excess deaths are unprecedented. The 2025 figures should be a massive story in media but won't be.
The Cremation Society. Committed to the future.
Funny.
Update issued from cremation society and all cause mortality for 2025 relayed to them by NRS. See table!
I looked at the table.
What am I supposed to understand?
I have booked a burial plot. The idea of cremation never appealed. Today's BBC R4 PM news features some chap who did not apparently cremate bodies. I pay scant attention. I never for one moment bought into covid1984, not because I studied tables or figures. I just didn't buy into. Gut feeling? Where do table figures come from? How reliable are they? Sadly, I just assume the state pedals codswallop.
🤣
It seems that someone believes that cremation is going to be a growth industry. The fact that 7 facilities have been added in the last 10 years indicates that, plus the rising percentage of cremation to deaths. I suspect that % also shows a change in how younger generations process their dead ~ less formal burials and fuss, cremation is cheaper maybe too. That said, the real stat is the total deaths column. Is that from some other official database, and does it check out? There looks to be around 57,000 deaths average before 2020. So, all things considered, Scotland is still higher than the historic trend, and especially in light of the dry tinder effect we should have seen post-covid, where deaths ebb markedly.
.
Thanks for your vigilance.
I agree deaths are still trending at least 3,000 more annually than you would expect. I linked to NRS data for all cause deaths calculations for 2025. You can do this by adding up the monthly or weekly mortality totals which differ slightly but not much.
Update issued from cremation society and all cause mortality for 2025 relayed to them by NRS. See table!
Also see shocking feedback from the Scottish public vs the 2022 excess deaths consultation.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/excess-deaths-scotlandpublic-consultation?utm_source=publication-search
Also- https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newexcess-deaths-scandal-in-scotland?utm_source=publication-search
Thanks!
Will do.
The Road to Fascism
Simon Elmer.
https://rumble.com/v28ck6y-the-road-to-fascism.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a
BP's link.
Look at this!
https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/latest-news/unprecedented-changes-in-scotland-s-population/
NRS estimates that there will be a fall of almost 80,000 in the number of children aged 0-15 between 2022 and 2047. It’s also projecting a fall of more than 57,000 in people aged 16 to 29. While NRS does project an increase of more than 144,000 30- to 59-year-olds, it still leaves Scotland with more people of pension age than it's ever had before and a working-age population slightly smaller than it is today.
Yeah i knew about this. The NRS dashboard is very revealing. Goto 'Change by age group' There is a menu 'projection variant' you can select the dif scenarios inc 'replacement fertility.'
https://scotland.shinyapps.io/nrs-population-projection-variants-scotland-uk/
''The number of people aged 75 and over is projected to increase by 300,700 over the 25 years to mid-2049. Meanwhile, the number of children (aged 0 to 15) and young adults (aged 16 to 29) are both projected to fall over the same period, by 165,900 and 157,500 respectively.''
https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/publications/projected-population-of-scotland-2024-based/
As these are just projections things in reality could turn out to be much worse which is admitted by NRS.
I have been thinking about all this. The tone of the reporting on the national population projections site does not suggest this is a surprise to them. It looks more like a planned, phased population reduction with some immigrant replacement.
The thing is that the native population is skilled, the immigrants less so. You cannot just randomly eliminate swathes of skilled workers without dramatic losses to industry and essential services.
There are also specialist skilled people and teams who cannot be replaced at all under about a decade of training and experience of working together - some specialist medical teams are like this.. What will happen when these interdependent skills disappear because one essential member in a complex interlocking structure has been unpredictably lost at an early age?
I wonder whether the toxic lots were targeted at certain demographics and districts.
There were rumours that the injection deployment was helped by the use of AI.
You would need to achieve this unless you want to wipe out the entire professional middle class. An essential class. Does that sound like a desirable goal?
I used to belong to a Reddit lockdownsceptics group and there was a Scottish lady there who said she lived in a very depressed working class/unemployed village in Scotland. The deaths and strokes in her village were numerous according to her. We all wondered if her village had been targeted.
The effect of these losses on society will soon become evident.
'The tone of the reporting on the national population projections site does not suggest this is a surprise to them. It looks more like a planned, phased population reduction with some immigrant replacement.'
-Agree. Because there is no concern shown either by NRS, 'public 'health' or our politicians you can then only conclude this is a plan being successfully executed.
See this very sobering analysis from 9-13mins- https://rumble.com/v1zsro2-are-we-being-culled.html?e9s=src_v1_upp_v
''In three generations (>75%) of native Scots will be gone.''
Thanks for the link to thinking coalition. I have bookmarked them.
https://rumble.com/c/ThinkingCoalition?e9s=src_v1_cbl
Another critic platform i contacted that rejected the inquiry information unfortunately. 'People have moved on' i recall was the response.
🤢 Strange! Who is trustworthy?
The reason there are over 60,000 deaths for the sixth year in a row is probably because of the baby boomer bust. This was the 'window of opportunity' UN/WEF were talking about.
They could use this to pretend something invisible, new and deadly was going around.
All of this was expected and discussed in the 1990's then everyone suddenly stopped talking about it.
Latest from NRS;
'Scotland’s population is projected to start falling earlier than previously suggested, according to the latest population projections from National Records of Scotland. '
https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/latest-news/scotland-s-population-projected-to-fall-from-2034/
'Scotland’s population is undergoing unprecedented change, according to new analysis from National Records of Scotland (NRS). 'Births and the fertility rate are at an all-time low and for the ninth year in a row there were more deaths than births in 2024.'
https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/latest-news/unprecedented-changes-in-scotland-s-population/
I often promote the website by Sally Clark, an Australian, who lives in the Philippines.
She has been collating and analysing death and fertility statistics for Asia, Australia, Japan Taiwan and the Philippines.
Her work is high quality. The Asian statistics may be less manipulated to hide deaths than the statistics in the USA and Europe.
My impression is that the real impact is on fertility. Some of her countries have lost 25-50% fertility in five years, 5% each year and it is continuing at this rate.
Deaths are about 10-15% elevated after the unprecedented highs of 2021-2 and static at that level.
https://supersally.substack.com/
Thanks. Since 2024 stats agencies in the UK decided to use new modelling to calculate excess deaths rather than the 5 year average which of course the new method normalises the measurement. Here is a good overview of it all by Freedom Podcast.
Temp 48hr link- https://streamable.com/etkoh0
Singapore takes the record for excess deaths at 49% for 2021-2.
A highly compliant and policed society.
Great link, well explained and short.
Update issued from cremation society and all cause mortality for 2025 relayed to them by NRS. See table!
I just had an update from cremation society and all cause mortality for 2025 relayed to them by NRS. See table!
Why do you consider, 64,461 deaths in 2025 significantly more than the 64,000 odd in 2020? The increase of less than 400 represents an increase of less than 1 percent. This is well within the range of normal variability.
I don't believe i said 'significantly more' only more. Regardless to be experiencing MORE deaths in 2025 that at ANY time during 'the pandemic' period is quite shocking. None of this is normal.
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-covid-jab-slaughter-machine-continues?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=x2r5q
Another big critic influencer account ''exposing the darkness'' afaik has supported nothing i have posted in 3 years when i have ACTUALLY been exposing the darkness. As for Edward Dowd a former Blackrock execxutive not exactly someone i would trust. You might instead be better listening to and promoting the views of real everyday people.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/excess-deaths-scotlandpublic-consultation?utm_source=publication-search