Agree Martin i made sure everyone in my local Tesco knew about it this morning though. GB News i was in contact with for a while vs Scottish inquiry after some coverage the producer suddenly left and my follow up emails were all ignored.
....it doesn't seem to have been but I expect OFCOM or the 'Establishment' will warn GB News off coverage. As GBN has increased viewing figures any discussions or reporting of the current module would be seen by too many people who would be reminded ( as if that was necessary) of the coercion to have an unsafe and ineffective 'vaccine'. A viewer might think of a relative or neighbour in poor health or dead and recall they had the 'jab' ....talk about it more and more to the point it becomes a crescendo of anger against said 'Establishment'. It wants to keep a lid on all of that hence the way the Inquiry is being orchestrated.
Kate Scott was very straightforward and articulate, she expressed so very well not just the personal devastation of her husband's vaccine injury but also clearly described the impact the covid injections had on the vaccine injury group. To add insult to their life changing injuries they have to plead their case to faceless, soulless bureaucrats and then most of them are told their terrible injuries are just not good enough to pass the 60% arbitrary line. How more abusive can it be? They have to fight to get their injuries recognised as vaccine damage then they have to plead their case only for most to be told it does not come to the governments 60% disability, I wonder what percentage is quoted when someone loses the function of an arm, leg, speech or eyesight, what is the cost of that in bureaucrat speak 10, 15 or maybe 20%. Disgusting.
I think the governments are just continuing their overt abusive tactics that they inflicted on the public in 2020. As you say all of it is utterly disgusting, they deny the vaccine injured a voice and then they deny them recognition of the harms inflicted by the vaccines making them having to plead for emotional, physical and financial help - abuse!
''Kelly Hatfield, whose father Kenneth Purnell died from Vaccine Induced Vasculitis, was not allowed to see her father for the length of his stay in hospital. On the morning of Ken's death, Kelly and her motherwere outside the ward door while her father was on the other side dying.''
'Only after he was announced dead were they allowed to see him. Kelly and her mother had begged on many occasions to be allowed onto the ward.''
This was all so tragically predicted by the Swine Flu scandal - "A boy with a rare sleeping illness caused by a swine flu vaccine has won £120,000 in damages."
Well, £120k is peanuts compared to the real costs of a lifelong disability - my son has a significant disability and we spend more than that on his support team each year - luckily provided by out local authority as a direct payment. The real costs will fall on families, social services, and the DWP in benefits. (all paid for by us taxpayers) . Whilst Big Pharma runs off with billions in profits.
"Josh Hadfield, 10, from Frome in Somerset, developed narcolepsy after receiving the Pandemrix vaccine six years ago.
He was awarded the money after appealing against the government which had initially refused to pay as he was not "severely disabled" enough.
His mother Caroline Hadfield said winning was a "huge relief".
Families are entitled to £120,000 through the Vaccine Damage Payments Scheme, external, but only if they can prove "severe" disability.
Josh's narcolepsy was triggered after he was given the H1N1 2009 influenza vaccine, known as Pandemrix, made by GlaxoSmithKline, in January 2010.
He also suffers from cataplexy, which affects muscle control, but he had shown no symptoms of the illness before being vaccinated."
I wish to congratulate Mrs Scott for articulating what many people wish to say but never get the chance they know it wasn't safe or effective and the public don't even know about the COVID enquiry they and I mean they couldn't tell the truth if there Life dependent on it.
Kate was outstanding 👏 she gave strong & concise evidence. Powerful personal information about Jamie with such composure 🙏 as devastation to their lives / family. She lay out the " uncomfortable TRUTHS" AND REALITY supporting us all in her words . 💜💜💜
You can prove the shots are harmful simply by pointing to the fact compensation is denied if you're less than "60% disabled". Besides being a discriminatory practice (who measures these made up 'percentages' of disability?), it basically admits people do get disabled by the shots, but they want to 'close out' those injured. What does a 50% disabled person look like, and why is *any* level of harmful disability acceptable?
The politicians are mass murderers and injurers of both children and adults alike.
If lab leaks really do threaten the world then we might need a new world order to deal with it. Presumably one with compulsory injections surveillance digital id etc. Do you remember this, daily beagle bloke?
One would hope no one was coerced into taking a "harmful" injection because of that fear pron. Not deadly or irreversibly life destroying. Just harmful which is in the same category as stubbing your toe or dislocating a finger
Reports of vaccine damage and calls for compensation make me despondent - because I can see a familiar pattern evolving. Denial of valid claims in notthing new, it has been going on for many years.
Our government has past form in dealing with injured claimants - it has fine tuned the methods to delay and deny compensation by practicing on the Autism, Chronic fatigue/ME and Gulf war victims' claims.
No amount of evidence of injury can change this process.
I feel so sorry for the people who are trying to get restitution - as far as I can judge, the Department of Health will sweep nearly everyone into the "unexplained" category and use and reward psychiatrists to claim these people are not truly ill.
People do not realise that someone who is vaccine injured must "prove" the vaccine injury to the perpetrator - the government - and this is impossible because the government - which is what you are up against - will never release the research funding for the medical research that could provide the proof.
Instead the DoH is adept at funding "research" that gets them off the hook. This is the only kind of "research" that is allowed and gets into public consciousness via the controlled media. Check out what happened to the victims of Gulf War "syndrome." The real illnesses these men suffered were never admitted but psychiatrised away by the UK in a despicable action. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC524139/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1476179306700866
The medical understanding of CFS/ME has been held back and not advanced for forty years.(Of which a large number in my opinion are vaccine injury in adults) Try asking for help from the government.
When it is too late people realise what they have been told about "benefit claimants" is a lie. They will get nothing.
Powerful indeed. Can you imagine what the impact would be if this clip was played on the TV evening news?
I'm not in the UK so can't tell if there is any media coverage of this testimony at all. Surely it might at least get a mention on GB News?
Agree Martin i made sure everyone in my local Tesco knew about it this morning though. GB News i was in contact with for a while vs Scottish inquiry after some coverage the producer suddenly left and my follow up emails were all ignored.
....it doesn't seem to have been but I expect OFCOM or the 'Establishment' will warn GB News off coverage. As GBN has increased viewing figures any discussions or reporting of the current module would be seen by too many people who would be reminded ( as if that was necessary) of the coercion to have an unsafe and ineffective 'vaccine'. A viewer might think of a relative or neighbour in poor health or dead and recall they had the 'jab' ....talk about it more and more to the point it becomes a crescendo of anger against said 'Establishment'. It wants to keep a lid on all of that hence the way the Inquiry is being orchestrated.
Kate Scott was very straightforward and articulate, she expressed so very well not just the personal devastation of her husband's vaccine injury but also clearly described the impact the covid injections had on the vaccine injury group. To add insult to their life changing injuries they have to plead their case to faceless, soulless bureaucrats and then most of them are told their terrible injuries are just not good enough to pass the 60% arbitrary line. How more abusive can it be? They have to fight to get their injuries recognised as vaccine damage then they have to plead their case only for most to be told it does not come to the governments 60% disability, I wonder what percentage is quoted when someone loses the function of an arm, leg, speech or eyesight, what is the cost of that in bureaucrat speak 10, 15 or maybe 20%. Disgusting.
She was very impressive! The story of someone told 59% disabled was really disgusting.
I lost my mum to a fake and fraudulent PCR test CT over 40
She was discharged from hospital but never made it home the ward was closed I despise what they did it's unforgivable
Disgraceful! Thanks for sharing all the same as the stories must be told.
I think the governments are just continuing their overt abusive tactics that they inflicted on the public in 2020. As you say all of it is utterly disgusting, they deny the vaccine injured a voice and then they deny them recognition of the harms inflicted by the vaccines making them having to plead for emotional, physical and financial help - abuse!
Gaslighting extraordinaires and shame on the NHS.
''Kelly Hatfield, whose father Kenneth Purnell died from Vaccine Induced Vasculitis, was not allowed to see her father for the length of his stay in hospital. On the morning of Ken's death, Kelly and her motherwere outside the ward door while her father was on the other side dying.''
'Only after he was announced dead were they allowed to see him. Kelly and her mother had begged on many occasions to be allowed onto the ward.''
- VIBUK statement paragraphs 140-141
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-somerset-35472926
This was all so tragically predicted by the Swine Flu scandal - "A boy with a rare sleeping illness caused by a swine flu vaccine has won £120,000 in damages."
Well, £120k is peanuts compared to the real costs of a lifelong disability - my son has a significant disability and we spend more than that on his support team each year - luckily provided by out local authority as a direct payment. The real costs will fall on families, social services, and the DWP in benefits. (all paid for by us taxpayers) . Whilst Big Pharma runs off with billions in profits.
"Josh Hadfield, 10, from Frome in Somerset, developed narcolepsy after receiving the Pandemrix vaccine six years ago.
He was awarded the money after appealing against the government which had initially refused to pay as he was not "severely disabled" enough.
His mother Caroline Hadfield said winning was a "huge relief".
Families are entitled to £120,000 through the Vaccine Damage Payments Scheme, external, but only if they can prove "severe" disability.
Josh's narcolepsy was triggered after he was given the H1N1 2009 influenza vaccine, known as Pandemrix, made by GlaxoSmithKline, in January 2010.
He also suffers from cataplexy, which affects muscle control, but he had shown no symptoms of the illness before being vaccinated."
Lessons were learned Rob. https://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c641
I wish to congratulate Mrs Scott for articulating what many people wish to say but never get the chance they know it wasn't safe or effective and the public don't even know about the COVID enquiry they and I mean they couldn't tell the truth if there Life dependent on it.
Also read witness statement Frank.
Kate was outstanding 👏 she gave strong & concise evidence. Powerful personal information about Jamie with such composure 🙏 as devastation to their lives / family. She lay out the " uncomfortable TRUTHS" AND REALITY supporting us all in her words . 💜💜💜
Yes Kirst, an extremely impressive no nonsense presentation. The witness statement is really shocking.
Oh believe me there is more to come .
You can prove the shots are harmful simply by pointing to the fact compensation is denied if you're less than "60% disabled". Besides being a discriminatory practice (who measures these made up 'percentages' of disability?), it basically admits people do get disabled by the shots, but they want to 'close out' those injured. What does a 50% disabled person look like, and why is *any* level of harmful disability acceptable?
The politicians are mass murderers and injurers of both children and adults alike.
If lab leaks really do threaten the world then we might need a new world order to deal with it. Presumably one with compulsory injections surveillance digital id etc. Do you remember this, daily beagle bloke?
One would hope no one was coerced into taking a "harmful" injection because of that fear pron. Not deadly or irreversibly life destroying. Just harmful which is in the same category as stubbing your toe or dislocating a finger
It's interesting your rebuttal consists of a weak strawman argument.
You jump to the conclusion lab leaks means digital ID.
Why not just punish the lab leakers and close down the labs?
Discredit agents really aren't up to snuff these days, are they?
Reports of vaccine damage and calls for compensation make me despondent - because I can see a familiar pattern evolving. Denial of valid claims in notthing new, it has been going on for many years.
Our government has past form in dealing with injured claimants - it has fine tuned the methods to delay and deny compensation by practicing on the Autism, Chronic fatigue/ME and Gulf war victims' claims.
No amount of evidence of injury can change this process.
I feel so sorry for the people who are trying to get restitution - as far as I can judge, the Department of Health will sweep nearly everyone into the "unexplained" category and use and reward psychiatrists to claim these people are not truly ill.
People do not realise that someone who is vaccine injured must "prove" the vaccine injury to the perpetrator - the government - and this is impossible because the government - which is what you are up against - will never release the research funding for the medical research that could provide the proof.
Instead the DoH is adept at funding "research" that gets them off the hook. This is the only kind of "research" that is allowed and gets into public consciousness via the controlled media. Check out what happened to the victims of Gulf War "syndrome." The real illnesses these men suffered were never admitted but psychiatrised away by the UK in a despicable action. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC524139/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1476179306700866
The medical understanding of CFS/ME has been held back and not advanced for forty years.(Of which a large number in my opinion are vaccine injury in adults) Try asking for help from the government.
When it is too late people realise what they have been told about "benefit claimants" is a lie. They will get nothing.
Where is the accountability? I don't see the groups concerned about that as a priority.