17 Comments
User's avatar
Alan Munro's avatar

I was given a mild rebuke and a veiled warning of disciplinary action because I repeatedly posted anti global warming messages on my employers website.

My employer was local council and I was in breach of contract etc. I joined FSU but they didn’t really offer much hope in terms of employment tribunal. Currently serving three month ban from their website.

I will be back!

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

Shocking! Facts are now fiction and vice versa. New normal.

Expand full comment
Alan Munro's avatar

I think just general contract of employment terms as in not bringing your employer into disrepute. I discussed it fully with union rep and FSU. Both felt I was on dodgy ground and unlikely to win at tribunal if I were to be dismissed and went to tribunal.

Expand full comment
Declaration of Dumfries's avatar

Did they tell you which part of your contract you'd breached?

Expand full comment
Seacat's avatar

It is censoring because intelligent comments made by the public undermine and challenge their bought and paid for 'climate crisis' narrative. They can't have that! It's pretty futile now such censorship because the 'truth' has seeped out from underneath their blanketing of contrary opinions. They were good to read!

Expand full comment
Colin Mcalpine's avatar

The government is too far down the road now to ever turn back so they will just ignore anyone who opposes their policies on climate etc.

I came across this substack which gives an amazing hypothesis behind the current climate con and the changes happening in government and society - well worth a read. 👍👍

https://open.substack.com/pub/ukcolumn/p/the-not-so-great-carbon-reset-part?r=1h13qy&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Expand full comment
Rob Kay's avatar

Regardless of the 'climate change' agenda, it is hardly surprising that farmers want better flood defences, and of course they will jump on that opportunity. To be fair, so do ordinary householders. Floods have always been a problem in a country in which rainfall of 150" a year falls (Ft William has been recording that for many decades) and flood defences need improving., Here in North Lanarkshire we also need better flood protection.

Of course, building houses on flood plains was always a daft thing to do - but profits, profits, profits ;-)

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

I think what would help locally is to unblock the drains for starters. I've got half dozen completely blocked drains all within a 400metre radius of my property. As we can see from the stats there is no evidence of a climate crisis/emergency however farmers that refuse to submit to this agenda will have 50% of their funding cut. So yes to flood defences and common sense but no to climate crisis hysteria and lack of/no facts .

We should also build more reservoirs. 40 years since last one.

Did you know?

Megget Reservoir, built to serve Edinburgh, was the last large earth embankment to be built. Construction works started around 1976 and the reservoir went into service around 1983.

Annual rainfall totals in Scotland has been stable for the last quarter of a century and not once in Scotland’s history has an official drought been declared despite a growing population and unchecked ‘'global boiling.''

Expand full comment
Rob Kay's avatar

The drains around here in the Kelvin valley are constantly getting blocked with debris, some Kilsyth roads are frequently inundated and impassable, and whilst we are safe on a gentle prominence, a neighbour's house is in a dip and is constantly being ponded up by a foot or so of water following heavy rain. The fields between Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch are flooded for months a year. The geese are happy, the farmers, not!

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

Crop yields are not suffering so farmers are doing ok certainly no evidence of a climate crisis. For people to claim any unusual weather is now due to human activity and co2 is ridiculous!

Expand full comment
Bruce Scott's avatar

Great post David. You are over the target here. Keep up the great work.

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

Cheers Bruce. Original FOI submitted by Derek (Deek) Jackson but i felt needed to be shared.

Expand full comment
Amat's avatar

The responses were very much on point, we are as a society being regressed because of their fools mission to achieve net zero. It is not just financial deprivation, it will bring misery and hardship that we will be told to endure for the "greater good". They are not interested in the public's response, there is a mission to complete come hell or high water.

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

I just read that agenda30 intends for every person to take 500 jibs. is that in total for a lifetime does anyone know ? presumably not weekly lol . Sorry, its not funny I know.

Expand full comment
Rob Kay's avatar

sounds a bit like an urban myth to me - but Big Pharma would probably want you to take 5 a day, if they could get away with it. Hopefully Kennedy's high profile campaign will help to make many people ask the right questions and challenge the prevailing orthodoxy.

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

once everyone is too poor to refuse Id guess they would be jab-fodder for the industry to get super rich from.

Expand full comment
Yeowoman's avatar

Peter mccullough doesnt generally relay myths tbh. its in the Agenda apparently and sounds about right. UK govt is now gearing up to jab all the overweight folks with regular weightloss jabs. how many jabs every 3 months does it take to get to 500 ?

Expand full comment