Excellent evidence from Charlotte but I’m dismayed with another misleading comparison between vaccine injury and ‘long covid’. My understanding is that the illness named Covid-19 was alleged to arise as a rare but serious complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection and only affected those who were old and frail and/or with other co-morbidities. As such, the majority of the population were never at risk of Covid-19 or indeed ‘long covid’ which is more likely to be vaccine induced illness. ‘Long covid’ it seems has been a useful tool. I first encountered it back in March/April 2020 when a GP friend cited the experience of a colleague with ‘long covid’ to justify lockdowns when he didn’t know anyone who had died of Covid-19. ‘Long covid’ was also used as a scare tactic in the promotion of vaccines and now to dismiss and further obfuscate the evidence of the injuries they’ve caused. It seems to me that ‘long covid’ has been quietly and efficiently working away in background and might deserve much more critical analysis. Happy to be corrected if I’ve got this wrong. https://www.hartgroup.org/long-covid-myths-busted/
Excellent analysis Valerie, couldn't agree more. 'Long COVID' is simply a catch all term for lockdown/mask harms and of course adverse reactions to the 'vaccines.'
See 'Sir' John Bell video at end. This is now behind a paywall at least last time i checked.
I once caught a person lying about being unvaccinated claiming they had long COVID on Twitter. I accused them of lying based on the symptomology described, they threatened a defamation lawsuit, and then other sleuths dug up their old tweets revealing they had indeed received the shots. They frantically tried to delete the tweets but screenshots were already taken. Unsurprisingly they vanished into thin air after that expose.
‘‘The Telegraph newspaper claims to have received a threatening phone call from a senior official at the MHRA in March 2021 after publishing an article highlighting a causal link between the Astrazeneca vaccine and blood clots." They are gangsters who get their way by bullying, threatening and intimidation,the very same tactics used by the governments but they all hide it so well behind their nice suits and polite voices. How anyone can believe we live in a democracy is deluding themselves.
I highly suggest people read all the evidence provided that isn't being given any "air time"
Sadly our voices of harm injuries & bereaved are being suppressed and censored as usual.
Questions our lawyers & representatives want to ask are being shut down as 'out of scope" or because questions have to be submitted in advance they get to decide if allowed or not ...we are not getting much chance to say anything!! It's all kings council and one way narrative as usual 🙄 this is supposed to be impartial....😂🤣
You are doing amazing 👏 thank you for being a "constant" in this whole frigging nightmare. So many of us are on the edge we having been holding on hoping ...but we now know its up to us . So thank you for everything you write . I share and others share .
Well done Charlet Crichton for such a calm and professional testimony. Glad to see Lady Hallett and the barrister showing sensitivity and respect too. Perhaps they weren’t expecting so much heart wrenching evidence.
Excellent evidence from Charlotte but I’m dismayed with another misleading comparison between vaccine injury and ‘long covid’. My understanding is that the illness named Covid-19 was alleged to arise as a rare but serious complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection and only affected those who were old and frail and/or with other co-morbidities. As such, the majority of the population were never at risk of Covid-19 or indeed ‘long covid’ which is more likely to be vaccine induced illness. ‘Long covid’ it seems has been a useful tool. I first encountered it back in March/April 2020 when a GP friend cited the experience of a colleague with ‘long covid’ to justify lockdowns when he didn’t know anyone who had died of Covid-19. ‘Long covid’ was also used as a scare tactic in the promotion of vaccines and now to dismiss and further obfuscate the evidence of the injuries they’ve caused. It seems to me that ‘long covid’ has been quietly and efficiently working away in background and might deserve much more critical analysis. Happy to be corrected if I’ve got this wrong. https://www.hartgroup.org/long-covid-myths-busted/
Excellent analysis Valerie, couldn't agree more. 'Long COVID' is simply a catch all term for lockdown/mask harms and of course adverse reactions to the 'vaccines.'
See 'Sir' John Bell video at end. This is now behind a paywall at least last time i checked.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/new-foi-releaseretirement-of-nhs?utm_source=publication-search
It’s free to view, interesting.
Well it is on the substack post only cos i downloaded it.
👍🏻🙏🏻
I once caught a person lying about being unvaccinated claiming they had long COVID on Twitter. I accused them of lying based on the symptomology described, they threatened a defamation lawsuit, and then other sleuths dug up their old tweets revealing they had indeed received the shots. They frantically tried to delete the tweets but screenshots were already taken. Unsurprisingly they vanished into thin air after that expose.
‘‘The Telegraph newspaper claims to have received a threatening phone call from a senior official at the MHRA in March 2021 after publishing an article highlighting a causal link between the Astrazeneca vaccine and blood clots." They are gangsters who get their way by bullying, threatening and intimidation,the very same tactics used by the governments but they all hide it so well behind their nice suits and polite voices. How anyone can believe we live in a democracy is deluding themselves.
I highly suggest people read all the evidence provided that isn't being given any "air time"
Sadly our voices of harm injuries & bereaved are being suppressed and censored as usual.
Questions our lawyers & representatives want to ask are being shut down as 'out of scope" or because questions have to be submitted in advance they get to decide if allowed or not ...we are not getting much chance to say anything!! It's all kings council and one way narrative as usual 🙄 this is supposed to be impartial....😂🤣
I think we can all see how that is going
I'm doing my best Kirst but those with the biggest platforms to raise real awareness are nowhere.
You are doing amazing 👏 thank you for being a "constant" in this whole frigging nightmare. So many of us are on the edge we having been holding on hoping ...but we now know its up to us . So thank you for everything you write . I share and others share .
It means so much to me & others 🙏💜 x
Thanks.
darpamadethe jabs
Well done Charlet Crichton for such a calm and professional testimony. Glad to see Lady Hallett and the barrister showing sensitivity and respect too. Perhaps they weren’t expecting so much heart wrenching evidence.