It's terrifying to think of the undiagnosed heart conditions in the youngsters walking around today who were coerced into taking that terrible concoction.
I still cannot believe how many people voluntarily rushed towards getting the Covid injections in the UK. We are still living in bizarro land where no one in the general population really acknowledges what has happened, first rule of the covid vaccine is we do not talk about it.
It was all basically a compliance test to see how many would do as they were told with A) shite advice (because they either didn't have the ability to detect bullshit when they heard it, trusted their Govt, or were fearful that they were vulnerable.
Then we had B) bribes of - variously - free French Fries (USA), Ice-Cream (Israel), Pizza (Italy), Uber rides (UK) etc etc etc.
Then there was C) denial of rights to travel unless yiou were jabbed,
D) threats of fines and then imprisonment upon conviction for breaking the Coronavirus 'legislation', and then,
E) Compulsion by threat of dismissal from employment.
Hancock, Javid, Zahawi, Johnson, Whitty, Vallance, Bliar, Ferguson, Raine, Michie [et al] should all be swinging in Gibbets alongside each other....... and may yet do so if Nuremberg-2 ever comes about.
Once convicted, I would happily pull the lever on any (and every) single one of the bastards. Perhaps that's a way to kick-start the economy - hold auctions for the opportunity to stand at the lever?
Notice how anybody else who posts on Youtube about 'covid' or the 'vaccine effectiveness' gets a strike (or even termination)?....... except 'Dr.' John Campbell.
Funny that eh? Why does he escape those disciplines - is it because he is conTROLLed opposition?
I'm attempting to do the same analysis with New Zealand data, if I can get it. I was reading a substack by John Dee wherein he states that around half of people admitted to ED'S are driven there by family or friends, not in an ambulance. This may mask the real impact of the poison shots.
Lack of vaccination is not the cause of any acute illness. That's where we need to start from, instead of a fixation on viruses and bacteria as "causes". No - they are the result of internal derangement, not the cause.
I don't want to prevent flu or colds or smallpox or anything of this nature by vaccines of any kind. I want to prevent it by achieving overall health.
How is it that the black death did not affect everyone? Same for smallpox, Spanish flu, and every other acute, blame-a-virus/blame-a-germ syndrome.
Just look at that self satisfied smirk on Rubin's ugly mug telling us that we were the guinea pigs for a dangerous genetically modified "vaccine". He should be in jail.
To Mr. biologyphenom: I recommend you look up the difference between Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) and Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) in basic medical literature.
I realized this early on and did not get vaccinated.
Sarscov1 in Asia from 2002 to 2004 was highly lethal (30-50% of infections, although the exact figure is unknown).
As a result, the host died immediately along with Sarscov1, and the spread of infection was small.
On the other hand, virology believes that if it is highly infectious, it is less lethal because it cannot spread by killing the host.
In fact, the 2020 Phase I clinical trial report from Pfizer, which is full of fraud, even though, shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people out of 1000.
This means that 993 out of 1000 people will be the same whether they are vaccinated or not.
It also shows that even if everyone is unvaccinated, the infection rate is 8 people out of 1000.
The big problem here is the difference between RRR and ARR.
Many doctors (not to mention laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by the FDA, CDC and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, all of whom are unvaccinated, and 1,000 of them become infected.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate RRR will be 90%.
However, even if everyone is unvaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate ARR will be abt. 0.1%.
This is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to individuals.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is by no means the RRR.
There is a definitional formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people who would not have been infected are vaccinated, even people who would not have experienced side effects in the first place will suffer from side effects.
In some cases, people who would not have been infected and would not have died will die from side effects.
However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV also promote the relative effectiveness rate RRR,
and continue to mislead people into thinking that the probability that an individual can avoid infection is RRR.
The reason for this can only be either a lack of knowledge or indirectly receiving money from pharmaceutical companies to intentionally sell in large quantities.
Below are the results of my numerical calculations based on some clinical trial documents.
Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
It's terrifying to think of the undiagnosed heart conditions in the youngsters walking around today who were coerced into taking that terrible concoction.
I still cannot believe how many people voluntarily rushed towards getting the Covid injections in the UK. We are still living in bizarro land where no one in the general population really acknowledges what has happened, first rule of the covid vaccine is we do not talk about it.
It was all basically a compliance test to see how many would do as they were told with A) shite advice (because they either didn't have the ability to detect bullshit when they heard it, trusted their Govt, or were fearful that they were vulnerable.
Then we had B) bribes of - variously - free French Fries (USA), Ice-Cream (Israel), Pizza (Italy), Uber rides (UK) etc etc etc.
Then there was C) denial of rights to travel unless yiou were jabbed,
D) threats of fines and then imprisonment upon conviction for breaking the Coronavirus 'legislation', and then,
E) Compulsion by threat of dismissal from employment.
Hancock, Javid, Zahawi, Johnson, Whitty, Vallance, Bliar, Ferguson, Raine, Michie [et al] should all be swinging in Gibbets alongside each other....... and may yet do so if Nuremberg-2 ever comes about.
Once convicted, I would happily pull the lever on any (and every) single one of the bastards. Perhaps that's a way to kick-start the economy - hold auctions for the opportunity to stand at the lever?
Excellent use of Scottish statistics in a global context. Recommended reading.
Cheers Rob
Notice how anybody else who posts on Youtube about 'covid' or the 'vaccine effectiveness' gets a strike (or even termination)?....... except 'Dr.' John Campbell.
Funny that eh? Why does he escape those disciplines - is it because he is conTROLLed opposition?
At least Scotland doesn't seem to be playing silly buggers with releasing data.
Yet.
They will soon be brought under control.
Keep the faith. Many thanks.
I'm attempting to do the same analysis with New Zealand data, if I can get it. I was reading a substack by John Dee wherein he states that around half of people admitted to ED'S are driven there by family or friends, not in an ambulance. This may mask the real impact of the poison shots.
Lack of vaccination is not the cause of any acute illness. That's where we need to start from, instead of a fixation on viruses and bacteria as "causes". No - they are the result of internal derangement, not the cause.
I don't want to prevent flu or colds or smallpox or anything of this nature by vaccines of any kind. I want to prevent it by achieving overall health.
How is it that the black death did not affect everyone? Same for smallpox, Spanish flu, and every other acute, blame-a-virus/blame-a-germ syndrome.
Feh.
Thank you so much for your work.
Just look at that self satisfied smirk on Rubin's ugly mug telling us that we were the guinea pigs for a dangerous genetically modified "vaccine". He should be in jail.
I didn't used to believe in Capital Punishment.
Me neither, but we could make exceptions in the case of mass murder by pfizer et al.
"Mechanic wanted...."
To Mr. biologyphenom: I recommend you look up the difference between Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) and Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) in basic medical literature.
I realized this early on and did not get vaccinated.
Sarscov1 in Asia from 2002 to 2004 was highly lethal (30-50% of infections, although the exact figure is unknown).
As a result, the host died immediately along with Sarscov1, and the spread of infection was small.
On the other hand, virology believes that if it is highly infectious, it is less lethal because it cannot spread by killing the host.
In fact, the 2020 Phase I clinical trial report from Pfizer, which is full of fraud, even though, shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people out of 1000.
This means that 993 out of 1000 people will be the same whether they are vaccinated or not.
It also shows that even if everyone is unvaccinated, the infection rate is 8 people out of 1000.
The big problem here is the difference between RRR and ARR.
Many doctors (not to mention laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by the FDA, CDC and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, all of whom are unvaccinated, and 1,000 of them become infected.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate RRR will be 90%.
However, even if everyone is unvaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate ARR will be abt. 0.1%.
This is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to individuals.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is by no means the RRR.
There is a definitional formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Calculation site https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/how-to-calculate-risk/
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people who would not have been infected are vaccinated, even people who would not have experienced side effects in the first place will suffer from side effects.
In some cases, people who would not have been infected and would not have died will die from side effects.
However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV also promote the relative effectiveness rate RRR,
and continue to mislead people into thinking that the probability that an individual can avoid infection is RRR.
The reason for this can only be either a lack of knowledge or indirectly receiving money from pharmaceutical companies to intentionally sell in large quantities.
Below are the results of my numerical calculations based on some clinical trial documents.
Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
SK-Zooster (Shingrix) (shingles) ARR = 0.9%, RRR 94.2%
Meiji Replicon (Sarscov2) ARR = 0.5%, RRR = 95.5% (also a gene therapy drug)
Sequirus Flucelvax® Quad (for infulenzaA,B) ARR = 17.5%, RRR = 51.9%
However, Placebo was administered meningococcal ACWY-vax instead of saline.
In short, it was a fraudulent clinical trial, and all it says is that Flucelvax is more effective against influenza than ACWY-vax.
GSK's Arexvy (RSV) ARR = 0.26%, RRR = 82.5%
Moderna's mRNA-1345 (RSV) ARR = 0.53%, RRR = 68.4% (also a gene therapy drug)
Gardasil: HPV uninfected: ARR = 0.7%, RRR ≒ 50%
Gardasil: HPV already infected: ARR = 3.07%, RRR ≒ 70%
Gardasil contains the neurotoxin ALuminum at 416±75μg/dose
https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/metal-analysis-by-icp-ms.html
However, it is known that administering a vaccine for a disease when you are infected can actually be harmful.
In the case of Gardasil, you should be tested to see if you are already infected or not before administering it.
But the authorities have not made this mandatory and I feel they are being nasty.
Correlation is causation only when it sells product.
Eric Rubin... what ethnicity is that? same as Mayorkas and Merrick Garland? over achievers in the service to humanity
shared to all platforms and family and friends and to political parties cheers
https://thelightpaper.co.uk/