"It seems incredible with these statistics politicians and public health ‘experts’ would risk the health of future generations with fast tracked experimental mRNA injections given by their own admission the innoculations did not stop transmission." And, furthermore, didn't stop to ponder why there were MORE deaths of educators in 2021 (21) - the year of the "vaccine" - than in 2020 (18) - the year of the "COVID"... "safe and effective".
Actually , no evidence of a healthy child dying OF Covid anywhere in the world.
The youngest person to die OF Covid in N.Ireland was 38. Only 275 people died OF Covid in N.I in 4 years--the same number who would have died of flu--except no one did. (Source Dept of Health N.I via an FoI)
Every school child should take a COVID vaccine that (it is admitted) increases the risk of developing (and thus dying of) heart disease (myocarditis or clots) which is 7/0=infinity% deadlier than COVID.
NHS public health scientists and doctors appear to be incapable of basic thinking.
There is a big problem with vaccine effectiveness [the difference between the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) and the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR)].
Many doctors (and of course laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by the FDA, CDC and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, and 1,000 of them become infected if none of them are vaccinated.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) will be 90%.
However, even if none of them are vaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR) will be abt. 0.1%.
This ARR is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to individuals.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is by no means the RRR.
There is a definition formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people who would not have been infected are vaccinated, even people who would not have experienced side effects in the first place will suffer from side effects.
In some cases, people who would not have been infected and would not have died will die from side effects.
In fact, even the fraudulent Pfizer Phase I clinical trial report from 2020 shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people per 1,000. This means that 993 people out of 1,000 people will be not infected regardless of whether they are vaccinated or not. It also shows that even if no one is vaccinated, the infection rate is about 8 people per 1,000. However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV only promote the relative effectiveness rate (RRR), and continue to mislead people into thinking that RRR is the probability that an individual can avoid infection. The reason for this is either that they are ignorant or that they are indirectly receiving money from pharmaceutical companies and intentionally selling the vaccine. Below are the results of my numerical calculations based on several clinical trial reports.
Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
NRS stopped disclosing whether those that died were vaccinated or not. They are corrupt. We their employers should have access to raw data.
The very action of stopping the disclosing vax, or not, means they hide facts.
It would not surprise me at all if there were a fair number of vaxed children in the dead.
The article says to trust traditional news outlets as they've "proper checks and balances", ha!
It is difficult to know where to stand on childhood vaccines. I think babies get far too much "stuff" injected in to them at such a young age.
Who do you believe?
Would be useful to have accurate, trustworthy figures on actual harms and deaths from the diseases we try and prevent.
"It seems incredible with these statistics politicians and public health ‘experts’ would risk the health of future generations with fast tracked experimental mRNA injections given by their own admission the innoculations did not stop transmission." And, furthermore, didn't stop to ponder why there were MORE deaths of educators in 2021 (21) - the year of the "vaccine" - than in 2020 (18) - the year of the "COVID"... "safe and effective".
Actually , no evidence of a healthy child dying OF Covid anywhere in the world.
The youngest person to die OF Covid in N.Ireland was 38. Only 275 people died OF Covid in N.I in 4 years--the same number who would have died of flu--except no one did. (Source Dept of Health N.I via an FoI)
And wrt the vaccination of children---I asked our CMO and Health Minister to explain why you would do that--still waiting for an answer.
Writing it led to a ban from Linkedin
this is Part 1---in Parts 2 and 3 I list the questions.
https://hughmccarthy.substack.com/p/mistakes-were-not-made
https://hughmccarthy.substack.com/p/why-would-you-vaccinate-babies-against
btw our CMO is on record as saying we closed schools to keep the parents at home-it was nothing to do with the children.
And in the long term? Criminal authoritarianism and abuse of power. I’m sure the number of suicides and mental health problems are huge.
Every school child should take a COVID vaccine that (it is admitted) increases the risk of developing (and thus dying of) heart disease (myocarditis or clots) which is 7/0=infinity% deadlier than COVID.
NHS public health scientists and doctors appear to be incapable of basic thinking.
There is a big problem with vaccine effectiveness [the difference between the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) and the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR)].
Many doctors (and of course laypeople) do not understand the difference between absolute effectiveness rate and relative effectiveness rate (effectiveness rate as defined by the FDA, CDC and Pharmas).
For example, suppose there are 1 million people, and 1,000 of them become infected if none of them are vaccinated.
If all 1 million people are vaccinated and the number of infected people decreases to 100, the relative effectiveness rate (RRR) will be 90%.
However, even if none of them are vaccinated, 999,000 people will not be infected in the first place, so the absolute effectiveness rate (ARR) will be abt. 0.1%.
This ARR is the effectiveness rate that is meaningful to individuals.
The ARR is the average probability that an individual will not develop an infection if vaccinated. It is by no means the RRR.
There is a definition formula in the basics of medicine.
RRR≡(Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated) / Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo * 100 [%]
ARR≡ [1 - {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in placebo / Total number of people who developed symptoms in placebo} / {1 - Number of people who developed symptoms in vaccinated / Total number of people who developed symptoms}] * 100 [%]
Calculation site https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/how-to-calculate-risk/
Of course, there are side effects, so if a large number of people who would not have been infected are vaccinated, even people who would not have experienced side effects in the first place will suffer from side effects.
In some cases, people who would not have been infected and would not have died will die from side effects.
In fact, even the fraudulent Pfizer Phase I clinical trial report from 2020 shows that the Sarscov2 non-infection rate is 99.962% for vaccinated people and 99.246% for unvaccinated people, meaning that the difference in infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated people is only 7 people per 1,000. This means that 993 people out of 1,000 people will be not infected regardless of whether they are vaccinated or not. It also shows that even if no one is vaccinated, the infection rate is about 8 people per 1,000. However, doctors and public health authorities who appear on TV only promote the relative effectiveness rate (RRR), and continue to mislead people into thinking that RRR is the probability that an individual can avoid infection. The reason for this is either that they are ignorant or that they are indirectly receiving money from pharmaceutical companies and intentionally selling the vaccine. Below are the results of my numerical calculations based on several clinical trial reports.
Pfizer's BNT162b2 ARR = 0.716%, RRR = 95% (but this is clearly a gene therapy drug)
SK-Zooster (Shingrix) (shingles) ARR = 0.9%, RRR 94.2%
Meiji Replicon (Sarscov2) ARR = 0.5%, RRR = 95.5% (also a gene therapy drug)
Sequirus Flucelvax® Quad (for infulenza A, B) ARR = 17.5%, RRR = 51.9%
However, Placebo was administered meningococcal ACWY-vax instead of saline
In short, it was a fraudulent clinical trial, and all it says is that Flucelvax is more effective against influenza than ACWY-vax.
GSK's Arexvy (RSV) ARR = 0.26%, RRR = 82.5%
Moderna's mRNA-1345 (RSV) ARR = 0.53%, RRR = 68.4% (also a gene therapy drug)
Gardasil: HPV uninfected: ARR = 0.7%, RRR ≒ 50%
Gardasil: HPV already infected: ARR = 3.07%, RRR ≒ 70%
Gardasil contains the neurotoxin ALuminum at 416±75μg/dose
https://www.corvelva.it/speciale-corvelva/vaccinegate-en/metal-analysis-by-icp-ms.html
However, it is known that administering a vaccine for a disease when you are infected can actually be harmful.
In the case of Gardasil, you should be tested to see if you are already infected or not before administering it.
However, the authorities have not made this mandatory, and I feel they are being malicious.
Gardasil while infected is highly carcinogenic, so regular checkups and early surgery are best.