6 Comments
Sep 18Liked by biologyphenom

I cannot believe I used to listen to the people who call themselves “experts”, what a complete disaster they have constructed. They recite what they have been told and then fill it out with lies. Whatever “covid” was or is I would pick the ordinary man off the street to listen to than any of these pretend experts. The injuries and deaths that have caused and will cause into the future is mind numbing and proof of their ignorance and stupidity. My health advice? Stay away from experts!

Expand full comment

ok until you fracture your arm or get a gallstone , or your child does.

We are stuck with the medical system even if we knit our own yoghurt. everyone one day winds up needing something from these experts .. its a nightmare.

Expand full comment
Sep 18Liked by biologyphenom

The msm is still keen to keep the people worried about something that still hasn't been proved to exist after four+ years. That said, there are many doctors worldwide who say there's no such thing as 'long-c19'. Their view is that these people are jab-damaged, a real thing but wrongly labelled to instil fear in people for when the next boosters/jabs arrive.

Expand full comment

"Symptoms, signs and ill-defined conditions"

Ah yes, the ONS' definition for a vaccine injury that causes death.

https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/ons-declares-people-die-from-symptoms

Expand full comment

Sir John Bell is an interesting character…….dreadful thing that misinformation…. is this the same Sir John Bell who is commenting about the over estimation of long Covid?

‘Tracking down John Bell: how the case of the Oxford professor exposes a transparency crisis in government

‘…..The BMJ has previously raised concerns about Bell’s financial ties to industry, during a campaign it ran from 2009 for access to the clinical trial data on Tamiflu (oseltamivir), with an open letter to Bell published in 2012.5 At that time Bell was on the commercial board of Roche and received $420 000 from the company in 2011…..’

BMJ 2021; 372 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n490 (Published 24 February 2021)

Cite this as: BMJ 2021;372:n490

Expand full comment

Pre Convid was much more simple🤝

Those happy bygone days😇

Expand full comment