Frightening how they got away with this. Interesting they thought their messages could not be read outside of their emails. Fate has a funny way of dealing a hand.
The deaths are now coming home to me. I am uninjected but a friend has just been diagnosed with skin cancer and another is now in hospital with a damaged heart. They cannot continue to cover this up. Surely the doctors will be forced to speak out by what they are witnessing.
Thanks. I have been following this assault on us since the very beginning as I spotted the evil and lies straight away. (I have CFS/ME following a vaccine, worked for a support group with CFS/ME and realised that vaccines were a major trigger. I tried to help people overcome the stigma and lack of care for that illness.)
But I am shaken now that the injections are affecting my healthy friends - I warned one, (but she thought me "eccentric") the other has schizophrenia, is quite dependent and would not have understood that he could not trust his doctors. I said nothing to him as explaining it all would have distressed him and he would not have believed me or understood. I am sure he got all the injections.
Both diagnoses came this week. It does not look as if the harms are tailing off. These injections are very carefully designed bioweapons. And they were designed and planned decades in advance.
Why is John Campbell's youtube channel still up? The perpetrators want us to know - when it is too late - they want to create chaos and our governments to fall, so they can take over. Mke Yeadon cannot get a platform. Do you see Campbell as controlled resistance?
I am not a big Campbell fan and believe he just covers stuff for the views and revenue. And as you say him and you think about others too like Malhotra (with his new £19.99 documentary i still haven't seen) and others (all jabbed/promoted jab) are the 2024 heroes whereas docs that spoke truth from 2020 are deplatformed etc etc Very suss.
Everyone in the chain of command of the injections - government, design, production, treatments, doctors pharmacists nurses, have legal impunity. These are not pharmaceuticals legally, so no cGMP law can be broken. They have made themselves untouchable - yet Campbell keeps on about failures in regulation. MHRA and FDA have no jurisdiction over non pharmaceuticals. he knows this so why misdirect?
Maybe because his role now is to help calm the marks ready for the next op. He’s on the jabs bad island but vaccines good, there was a pandemic, dangerous germs are real and if only we hadn’t had dolts botching stuff it would have been better. Look at what they don’t talk about eg. Biological counter measures ordered by the US DOD and therefore none of the usual ‘safeguards’ apply not that they were worth diddly squat anyway, virology is a fraudulent farce and the structure both legal and monetary that has been put in place over many decades to get us to where we are now. Anyhow can’t stop I’ve got to get my flu and booster jab and don’t worry this time it’ll work, or so I’ve been told by the experts and who can doubt them. Toodle pip.
I ought to add that with regard to the friend with schizophrenia, to block harm to my friend I tried to persuade his carer, who was his brother, of the dangers of the vax, and was met with polite disbelief. It is now impossible to bring the subject up...this man made it clear he was not going to change his views. Yet he is active politically wrt Palestine and considers himself "aware." and looks down on anyone who believes the standard account of 9/11. Why he believes the degenerates in charge of the world care about his brothers or his grannies health, when he knows they blow apart women and children in Gaza I cannot imagine.
My, my this was their moment to shine, you can sense their excitement at being in the spotlight as I have said before it was the best of times for them. They are just hollowed out creatures who are good at acting and know nothing about public service, they would sell their fellow man down the river at a moment's notice. They are looking out for themselves and "looking out for each other". That is the sum and total of all the political class we are inflicted with. In all of the messages there was not one moment of compassion for their fellow man, very, very telling.
These exchanges reveal, among other things, how institutionally psychotic these people are.
Unfortunately this breed of health bureaucrat is swarming like a bunch of parasites throughout the medical ™ and administrative ™ and academic ™ and science ™ industries.
This evidence is only explosive if they are answerable for their actions. But if the judiciary are inert....nothing will happen.
I have seen this situation go on for years with the vaccine injured historically. They practiced their control mechanisms on autism and other vax injuries over the past forty years and have got it off pat. Once Andrew Wakefield is rehabilitated things might change......
Its a tricky case, especially for any vaccine sceptic, because most reasonable people agree with author and litigant Brian Deere, that:
"Dr Andrew Wakefield created a false research project to "show" a link between the MMR vaccine and autism--after he and a lawyer had set things up to profit hugely from this fake research"
Now, you can argue the facts, but the general consensus of reviewers, and one that I am unwilling to research because I lack the time or inclination, is that:
" They put twelve children through unnecessary medical tests, ignored data that didn't fit their hypothesis, created data to fit their hypothesis, got it all published in the Lancet (and shame on the peer reviewers, colleagues, and editors who didn't stop them). Meanwhile the parents of the twelve children and of other children with autism throughout the world were put through a misleading hell and the dangerous "anti-vaxxer" movement was created, and is still doing damage to this day. Although Wakefield was shown in court and by the (late-arriving) medical boards to have created this fiction and was discredited completely, he is still holding himself out as a victim of a conspiracy to "hide the truth" about vaccines, with the Internet giving continued life to the whole sorry scheme. This book is by the reporter who tracked down the outrageous con perpetrated upon the world.
If I had been Deer's editor, I would have asked the author to start with not knowing anything and reveal what a charlatan Wakefield was as he (the reporter) learned it, with the level of outrage and knowledge of fraud building up. But maybe Deer felt he had to start with “this guy is a terrible, dangerous fraud” (so true) in case the reader stopped after the first chapter, which some readers might do, given the quality and organization of the writing. I was interested in how Wakefield kept suing Deer for defamation, but would have been more interested in learning about the plight of the children affected by measles (because they didn’t get vaccinated) and their parents. And more sympathy in general is indicated for children and parents affected by autism, although he does a pretty good job of showing how desperate the parents were to find any reason for their children's disability or blame anyone but themselves (wrongfully), even while some of them held on to Wakefield's fake theory even after it had been disproved. But the fact that some of them were hoping to cash in and had—err—unreliable memories concerning the timing of the MMR vis-à-vis the development of autism symptoms could be balanced by more about how truly disabled these children can be and thus why their parents could be so desperate and susceptible to this fakery.
I also was pulled up short at times by the author’s negative physical descriptions of some of the parents and others who got involved with Wakefield; he may have unconsciously intended to show them in an even worse light than they were already standing in. The author’s anger and indignation over what he went through with being sued by Wakefield sometimes seems to overshadow the pain of the children and their families and what they are going through, aggravated by Wakefield’s deceit, which seems to be the more important point.
But that’s from an editorial perspective. From a personal perspective, this whole business was far more outrageous than I thought it was—I thought maybe Wakefield made mistakes in his research and then started the anti-vaccine bandwagon rolling, in good faith but mistaken. How awful that his colleagues or supervisors didn’t catch that he started out to prove something that would enrich him and make him famous rather than letting the research lead where it would. Except it wasn’t really research--the sample of twelve children consisted of those Wakefield thought would prove his hypothesis and were invited to participate in the "study." And he and a lawyer named Barr had set out to create a class action, funded by the British government, before the so-called research had even been done, hoping to cash in with a huge lawsuit like one that unsuccessfully challenged the safety of the DTP vaccine. The thought of those kids going through colonoscopies and other tests when they didn’t need them and were already mentally disabled (and so probably didn’t understand what was happening) is heartbreaking. Wakefield, Barr, et al., have a lot to answer for in the way they treated children who didn't need or profit from dangerous medications, manipulated their parents, and started a huge and unnecessary scare that, again, is still doing damage today."
For this reason, I am not planning to raise a standard for Wakefield - his methods were deeply flawed and set us back 20 years.
I thought your post was satirical. Surely you dont believe what you have just posted? There are plenty of online interviews with Wakefield that put the facts in their proper perspective. But here is not the place to discuss this.
Wakefield has always been a hero in my books. I'm not sure that amounts to much.
As for the judiciary, I'm thinking more 'angry mob with pitchforks and burning torches'. If it can be concretely shown Matt Hancock signed off, approved, or in some way explicitly authorised the mass murdering of the elderly, there's a lot of grieving folks who will be outraged at that.
The public must have a tipping point, and we must do everything we can to find it!
It is when it affects you personally. Because of my health I don't have a wide circle of friends - but this week to have two of them taken out is shocking and I do want justice.
I'm sorry to hear of your loss. I'm seeing a lot of major injuries and losses where I am. With the exception of one family member, no other reports, yet.
But I dread. I had a dream one of them had cancer. I'm not sure they would understand even if I told them.
Frightening how they got away with this. Interesting they thought their messages could not be read outside of their emails. Fate has a funny way of dealing a hand.
The deaths are now coming home to me. I am uninjected but a friend has just been diagnosed with skin cancer and another is now in hospital with a damaged heart. They cannot continue to cover this up. Surely the doctors will be forced to speak out by what they are witnessing.
Seen this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AHJc8D-7Vg&t=834s&ab_channel=Dr.JohnCampbell
Thanks. I have been following this assault on us since the very beginning as I spotted the evil and lies straight away. (I have CFS/ME following a vaccine, worked for a support group with CFS/ME and realised that vaccines were a major trigger. I tried to help people overcome the stigma and lack of care for that illness.)
But I am shaken now that the injections are affecting my healthy friends - I warned one, (but she thought me "eccentric") the other has schizophrenia, is quite dependent and would not have understood that he could not trust his doctors. I said nothing to him as explaining it all would have distressed him and he would not have believed me or understood. I am sure he got all the injections.
Both diagnoses came this week. It does not look as if the harms are tailing off. These injections are very carefully designed bioweapons. And they were designed and planned decades in advance.
Why is John Campbell's youtube channel still up? The perpetrators want us to know - when it is too late - they want to create chaos and our governments to fall, so they can take over. Mke Yeadon cannot get a platform. Do you see Campbell as controlled resistance?
I am not a big Campbell fan and believe he just covers stuff for the views and revenue. And as you say him and you think about others too like Malhotra (with his new £19.99 documentary i still haven't seen) and others (all jabbed/promoted jab) are the 2024 heroes whereas docs that spoke truth from 2020 are deplatformed etc etc Very suss.
Everyone in the chain of command of the injections - government, design, production, treatments, doctors pharmacists nurses, have legal impunity. These are not pharmaceuticals legally, so no cGMP law can be broken. They have made themselves untouchable - yet Campbell keeps on about failures in regulation. MHRA and FDA have no jurisdiction over non pharmaceuticals. he knows this so why misdirect?
Maybe because his role now is to help calm the marks ready for the next op. He’s on the jabs bad island but vaccines good, there was a pandemic, dangerous germs are real and if only we hadn’t had dolts botching stuff it would have been better. Look at what they don’t talk about eg. Biological counter measures ordered by the US DOD and therefore none of the usual ‘safeguards’ apply not that they were worth diddly squat anyway, virology is a fraudulent farce and the structure both legal and monetary that has been put in place over many decades to get us to where we are now. Anyhow can’t stop I’ve got to get my flu and booster jab and don’t worry this time it’ll work, or so I’ve been told by the experts and who can doubt them. Toodle pip.
I ought to add that with regard to the friend with schizophrenia, to block harm to my friend I tried to persuade his carer, who was his brother, of the dangers of the vax, and was met with polite disbelief. It is now impossible to bring the subject up...this man made it clear he was not going to change his views. Yet he is active politically wrt Palestine and considers himself "aware." and looks down on anyone who believes the standard account of 9/11. Why he believes the degenerates in charge of the world care about his brothers or his grannies health, when he knows they blow apart women and children in Gaza I cannot imagine.
"Surely the doctors will be forced to speak out by what they are witnessing."
I hate to be the morbid one, but the doctors will most likely be dying/dead as well.
We will have to organise a resistance movement to this madness sooner or later, lest they attempt to murder us again - and succeed.
Doctors will start speaking out when politicians start answering questions, and hopefully thats before hell freezes over.
These are Nuremberg crimes.
Criminal charges must be brought.
My, my this was their moment to shine, you can sense their excitement at being in the spotlight as I have said before it was the best of times for them. They are just hollowed out creatures who are good at acting and know nothing about public service, they would sell their fellow man down the river at a moment's notice. They are looking out for themselves and "looking out for each other". That is the sum and total of all the political class we are inflicted with. In all of the messages there was not one moment of compassion for their fellow man, very, very telling.
It's all about them.
Very true, very insightful comment.
These exchanges reveal, among other things, how institutionally psychotic these people are.
Unfortunately this breed of health bureaucrat is swarming like a bunch of parasites throughout the medical ™ and administrative ™ and academic ™ and science ™ industries.
I think it's fair to call this an infestation.
I've got a migraine from reading them all.
No worries- they've an mRNA migraine vaccine in the pipeline.
Maybe ask about being a trial subject?
'Safe and effective' is what I've heard.
That is a good word to describe them - infestation. I will remember that!
Yes. Reading the messages gave me a thrill of fear/disgust at the thought of having to share an office with such. 🤢
Lets hope they took all their jabs.
I'd like to know when we get the March-April 2020 insight into the Midazolam murders, if at all.
Per your prior request, spelling check:
Sotland -> Scotland
Whatssapp -> WhatsApp
Oh, those will be redacted for sure. ;-)
I wonder if there's some other means by which we can obtain them.
Matt Hancock's prattling in WhatsApp between those dates would surely be explosive.
Fucking Oakenshott selling us down the river for a book whilst the state massacres us.
This evidence is only explosive if they are answerable for their actions. But if the judiciary are inert....nothing will happen.
I have seen this situation go on for years with the vaccine injured historically. They practiced their control mechanisms on autism and other vax injuries over the past forty years and have got it off pat. Once Andrew Wakefield is rehabilitated things might change......
Not going to happen soon - he's become the bête noire of the pro-Vaxx movement, sort of like Emmanuel Goldstein in Orwell's 1984.
Its a tricky case, especially for any vaccine sceptic, because most reasonable people agree with author and litigant Brian Deere, that:
"Dr Andrew Wakefield created a false research project to "show" a link between the MMR vaccine and autism--after he and a lawyer had set things up to profit hugely from this fake research"
Now, you can argue the facts, but the general consensus of reviewers, and one that I am unwilling to research because I lack the time or inclination, is that:
" They put twelve children through unnecessary medical tests, ignored data that didn't fit their hypothesis, created data to fit their hypothesis, got it all published in the Lancet (and shame on the peer reviewers, colleagues, and editors who didn't stop them). Meanwhile the parents of the twelve children and of other children with autism throughout the world were put through a misleading hell and the dangerous "anti-vaxxer" movement was created, and is still doing damage to this day. Although Wakefield was shown in court and by the (late-arriving) medical boards to have created this fiction and was discredited completely, he is still holding himself out as a victim of a conspiracy to "hide the truth" about vaccines, with the Internet giving continued life to the whole sorry scheme. This book is by the reporter who tracked down the outrageous con perpetrated upon the world.
If I had been Deer's editor, I would have asked the author to start with not knowing anything and reveal what a charlatan Wakefield was as he (the reporter) learned it, with the level of outrage and knowledge of fraud building up. But maybe Deer felt he had to start with “this guy is a terrible, dangerous fraud” (so true) in case the reader stopped after the first chapter, which some readers might do, given the quality and organization of the writing. I was interested in how Wakefield kept suing Deer for defamation, but would have been more interested in learning about the plight of the children affected by measles (because they didn’t get vaccinated) and their parents. And more sympathy in general is indicated for children and parents affected by autism, although he does a pretty good job of showing how desperate the parents were to find any reason for their children's disability or blame anyone but themselves (wrongfully), even while some of them held on to Wakefield's fake theory even after it had been disproved. But the fact that some of them were hoping to cash in and had—err—unreliable memories concerning the timing of the MMR vis-à-vis the development of autism symptoms could be balanced by more about how truly disabled these children can be and thus why their parents could be so desperate and susceptible to this fakery.
I also was pulled up short at times by the author’s negative physical descriptions of some of the parents and others who got involved with Wakefield; he may have unconsciously intended to show them in an even worse light than they were already standing in. The author’s anger and indignation over what he went through with being sued by Wakefield sometimes seems to overshadow the pain of the children and their families and what they are going through, aggravated by Wakefield’s deceit, which seems to be the more important point.
But that’s from an editorial perspective. From a personal perspective, this whole business was far more outrageous than I thought it was—I thought maybe Wakefield made mistakes in his research and then started the anti-vaccine bandwagon rolling, in good faith but mistaken. How awful that his colleagues or supervisors didn’t catch that he started out to prove something that would enrich him and make him famous rather than letting the research lead where it would. Except it wasn’t really research--the sample of twelve children consisted of those Wakefield thought would prove his hypothesis and were invited to participate in the "study." And he and a lawyer named Barr had set out to create a class action, funded by the British government, before the so-called research had even been done, hoping to cash in with a huge lawsuit like one that unsuccessfully challenged the safety of the DTP vaccine. The thought of those kids going through colonoscopies and other tests when they didn’t need them and were already mentally disabled (and so probably didn’t understand what was happening) is heartbreaking. Wakefield, Barr, et al., have a lot to answer for in the way they treated children who didn't need or profit from dangerous medications, manipulated their parents, and started a huge and unnecessary scare that, again, is still doing damage today."
For this reason, I am not planning to raise a standard for Wakefield - his methods were deeply flawed and set us back 20 years.
I thought your post was satirical. Surely you dont believe what you have just posted? There are plenty of online interviews with Wakefield that put the facts in their proper perspective. But here is not the place to discuss this.
Wakefield has always been a hero in my books. I'm not sure that amounts to much.
As for the judiciary, I'm thinking more 'angry mob with pitchforks and burning torches'. If it can be concretely shown Matt Hancock signed off, approved, or in some way explicitly authorised the mass murdering of the elderly, there's a lot of grieving folks who will be outraged at that.
The public must have a tipping point, and we must do everything we can to find it!
It is when it affects you personally. Because of my health I don't have a wide circle of friends - but this week to have two of them taken out is shocking and I do want justice.
I'm sorry to hear of your loss. I'm seeing a lot of major injuries and losses where I am. With the exception of one family member, no other reports, yet.
But I dread. I had a dream one of them had cancer. I'm not sure they would understand even if I told them.