They have covered the bases, "both conspiracy beliefs and perceived closeness to God were related to a decreased perception of the covid-19 threat". Of course it had nothing to do with the lies and deceit of the staged "pandemic" of 2020, pure unadulterated gaslighting except we see through them easily, this is a performance for the remaining blind believers who are left or maybe it is a last ditch effort to maintain the "vaccine" lies. I am not surprised psychologists were involved in writing this paper, they are still trying to manipulate behaviour.
The psychologists study the relationship between certain attitudes and views of life and people's willingness to conform to medical and political authorities. They find that those who have their own ideas are less likely to follow the injunction to be jabbed.
The study views religious and 'conspiracy theory' beliefs pejoratively, the underlying assumption being that those holding them are irrational and delusional.
The study never tests the truth or reasonableness of any of the beliefs it scorns, and dismisses them without evaluating any specifically, indeed it hardly mentions any specifically. Was there really a pandemic? Was there good evidence to support the idea that the benefits of masking, isolation, testing, or injections outweighed the harms? Was there any ulterior motive for declaring a pandemic? Does Event 201 suggest the pandemic was premediatated? What was the purpose and influence of the WHO, WEF, the Bilderberg group, the Trilateral Commission, BMGF, GAVI, BIS, IMF, etc, etc and who is involved in these groups? Why was there such an emphasis on controlling narratives and creating fear in the population? Do the psychologists really think people should surrender their critical faculties and cease to make their own decisions in a supposed crisis?
Nor does the study test outcomes: for example comparing the health of those who conformed with the authoritarian covid demands with those who did not.
And nor does the study consider the ethics of demanding compliance, i.e. obtaining informed consent for all medical interventions under the Nuremberg Code. Still less does it consider the moral/psychological effect of violations of the Code by the authorities.
The study throws no light on why people resisted the measures, simply dismissing them as religious or conspiracy theorists. The psychologists are rationalising why people's autonomy should be ignored.
The most fearful and paranoid people in my life are the ones who believe strongly in government propaganda. Also while my faith has served me well, especially lately, all that is necessary for vaccine hesitancy is a little independent research.
It seems absurd to conflate the influence of religious beliefs and “conspiracy beliefs” with regard to vaccine take-up or “hesitancy”, which seems to be the main motivation of their study. Do these people really think they can do away with belief in religion and conspiracies when the latter are so obvious, especially the Covid "plandemic"? Talk about living in ivory towers.
Everyday, for nearly 5 years, I have emailed at least one of these ‘academics’ to point out their flawed methodologies, (undeclared) embedded ideologies, and multiple conflicts of interest. Not one single response to date. But I won’t stop. We must have justice.
The gaslighting was remorseless. Since I was skeptical from January 2020, read a ton about Virology, particularly Koch's Postulates, the work of Stefan Lanka, the Princeton research of summer 2020: testing which of 17 gaslighting public health messages would be most likely to encourage (coerce) "vaccine" compliance, I remain unjabbed. Sadly I cannot say the same for all my loved ones. These demons will pay in eternity, unless they repent. Authentic repentance requires public admission of guilt BTW, so I believe many perpetrators will damn themselves.
Here's a delicious Mind experiment for you, that I claim credit for:
Q:
Lets imagine that one tested 1M dead bodies for Covid-19, and found that 500,000 of them carried traces of having had exposure to the virus at some stage . In all other respects, there is no difference between the two groups, age of the 'covid' victims being if anything a year or two older than the 'non-covid' group.
A:
An impartial observer might reasonably conclude from that (reasonably fair) analysis that Covid-19 infection actually PROTECTED and PROLONGED LIFE!
Seems to relate to Polish people - who have a very different set of cultural beliefs and biases than Scotland, as we know from the ESS (European Social Survey) ... so I'm not sure how applicable this is to Scottish values and beliefs. Interesting though.
They have covered the bases, "both conspiracy beliefs and perceived closeness to God were related to a decreased perception of the covid-19 threat". Of course it had nothing to do with the lies and deceit of the staged "pandemic" of 2020, pure unadulterated gaslighting except we see through them easily, this is a performance for the remaining blind believers who are left or maybe it is a last ditch effort to maintain the "vaccine" lies. I am not surprised psychologists were involved in writing this paper, they are still trying to manipulate behaviour.
The psychologists study the relationship between certain attitudes and views of life and people's willingness to conform to medical and political authorities. They find that those who have their own ideas are less likely to follow the injunction to be jabbed.
The study views religious and 'conspiracy theory' beliefs pejoratively, the underlying assumption being that those holding them are irrational and delusional.
The study never tests the truth or reasonableness of any of the beliefs it scorns, and dismisses them without evaluating any specifically, indeed it hardly mentions any specifically. Was there really a pandemic? Was there good evidence to support the idea that the benefits of masking, isolation, testing, or injections outweighed the harms? Was there any ulterior motive for declaring a pandemic? Does Event 201 suggest the pandemic was premediatated? What was the purpose and influence of the WHO, WEF, the Bilderberg group, the Trilateral Commission, BMGF, GAVI, BIS, IMF, etc, etc and who is involved in these groups? Why was there such an emphasis on controlling narratives and creating fear in the population? Do the psychologists really think people should surrender their critical faculties and cease to make their own decisions in a supposed crisis?
Nor does the study test outcomes: for example comparing the health of those who conformed with the authoritarian covid demands with those who did not.
And nor does the study consider the ethics of demanding compliance, i.e. obtaining informed consent for all medical interventions under the Nuremberg Code. Still less does it consider the moral/psychological effect of violations of the Code by the authorities.
The study throws no light on why people resisted the measures, simply dismissing them as religious or conspiracy theorists. The psychologists are rationalising why people's autonomy should be ignored.
Comments like this is why i love substack! ;-)
Lol, I got a bit carried away!
Not at all. 5 stars!!
Excellent analysis. Thanks biologyphenom once again
Great comment. 👍🇦🇺
The most fearful and paranoid people in my life are the ones who believe strongly in government propaganda. Also while my faith has served me well, especially lately, all that is necessary for vaccine hesitancy is a little independent research.
"Thou shalt have no false gods. Only The Science." There it is, spelled out. Satanic.
The pure irony of all of this is for vaccine cultists, the vaccine is their god.
It seems absurd to conflate the influence of religious beliefs and “conspiracy beliefs” with regard to vaccine take-up or “hesitancy”, which seems to be the main motivation of their study. Do these people really think they can do away with belief in religion and conspiracies when the latter are so obvious, especially the Covid "plandemic"? Talk about living in ivory towers.
Everyday, for nearly 5 years, I have emailed at least one of these ‘academics’ to point out their flawed methodologies, (undeclared) embedded ideologies, and multiple conflicts of interest. Not one single response to date. But I won’t stop. We must have justice.
The gaslighting was remorseless. Since I was skeptical from January 2020, read a ton about Virology, particularly Koch's Postulates, the work of Stefan Lanka, the Princeton research of summer 2020: testing which of 17 gaslighting public health messages would be most likely to encourage (coerce) "vaccine" compliance, I remain unjabbed. Sadly I cannot say the same for all my loved ones. These demons will pay in eternity, unless they repent. Authentic repentance requires public admission of guilt BTW, so I believe many perpetrators will damn themselves.
Here's a delicious Mind experiment for you, that I claim credit for:
Q:
Lets imagine that one tested 1M dead bodies for Covid-19, and found that 500,000 of them carried traces of having had exposure to the virus at some stage . In all other respects, there is no difference between the two groups, age of the 'covid' victims being if anything a year or two older than the 'non-covid' group.
A:
An impartial observer might reasonably conclude from that (reasonably fair) analysis that Covid-19 infection actually PROTECTED and PROLONGED LIFE!
...
Prove me wrong!
Seems to relate to Polish people - who have a very different set of cultural beliefs and biases than Scotland, as we know from the ESS (European Social Survey) ... so I'm not sure how applicable this is to Scottish values and beliefs. Interesting though.
Go & tell that to the fake Pope & don't forget to pick up your gold coin on the way out.
https://www.ncronline.org/news/vatican/vatican-coins-illustrate-war-against-ukraine-importance-vaccines