10 Comments
User's avatar
Amat's avatar

This is going to be one very long and painful waking up for most people if they ever do, there is no angry questions, no angry resentment, just gentle queries from them. They all still seem to think that it was done with good intentions but mistakes were made. It really is most depressing.

Expand full comment
Gary S's avatar

Your coverage of the inquiry humbles me. So many need to see and understand the implications for such horrendous crimes against their communities by those they elect or trusted. Those people need to be held to account and your work helps expose them. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Joel Smalley's avatar

3 years on and the majority are still confusing "long COVID" with simply yet another in a litany of adverse "vaccine" events, and meekly "wondering" why there should be excess deaths post-pandemic... How about 2wondering" why the mainstream media published (fake) daily death rates during the "pandemic" but won't even offer an odd side column to the fact that more people died after the "vaccine" was introduced than before...

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

I'm very confident Susanne Napier wanted to say the jab caused her Long COVID. Why else would she feel so strongly about no more doses? Also note how the lawyer made a deliberate move NOT to have her read out paragraph 66 as lack of informed consent is illegal. I don't think people realise how important Scots COVID inquiry is..

Expand full comment
Valerie Nelson's avatar

This is very interesting. Doctors have mainly been publicly silent on vaccine injury although I know a few of them in my locality who have been very vocal in the privacy of the consulting room. All credit to her but I’m curious to understand why Dr Gail Cunningham was free to speak publicly about her concerns without fear of repercussions from the GMC?

Expand full comment
The Underdog's avatar

It's quite extensive but I've done some extensive number crunching on the Czechia vaccination dataset Steve Kirsch acquired. You might find it of interest:

https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/deep-dive-of-the-deaths-dataset

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

Thanks

Expand full comment
Flora's avatar

There was an ex-nurse removed from the inquiry - "NEW INFO as ex nurse with damaging evidence against SNP leaders removed from inquiry"

https://youtu.be/tYLMlYIElQ8?si=GgtbUrak-P3ZuOFB

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 20Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
The Underdog's avatar

There's going to be a lot of attempted infiltration within the ranks in a desperate attempt to muddy the waters.

We are gaining traction, last I heard in the US 5 States were suing Pfizer (see: https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/robert-f-kennedy-jr-backs-lawsuits-against-pfizer-over-covid-19-vaccine-safety-the-tide-is-turning-101719371877572.html), so I think pharmaceutical companies are going to try every dirty trick in the book to save their own hides.

Expand full comment
Flora's avatar

Interesting, thank you 🙏🏻

Expand full comment