12 Comments

I've posted on several social media sites where people have claimed that jbs have saved millions of lives, asking a very basic question 'How do we know when a jab has saved a life; how did it prevent deaths'? Given that Pfizer Director Janine Small admitted to EU Committee in Oct 2022 that their jabs were never tested whether they stopped transmission, their scientists were working at the speed of science to rush the product to market. The only response I've had is to be called a conspiracy theorist.

Expand full comment

The mRNA by fundamental design cannot stop the spread. It results in antibodies against spike that circulate in bloodstream, and no IgM mucosal response. So it could only have every reduced severity by blocking progress of the infection past the respiratory tissues. Since incubation and spread occur prior, the most optimistic hope was a tiny reduction in spread. This was a farce from the beginning. Imagine forcing people who already had Covid, and has antibodies against all the components of the virus, to accept the nightmare which is mRNA poisoning?

Expand full comment

The BBC are propagandist scum.

Expand full comment

Thank you so much for this Dave, you’ve no idea how helpful this is in my work with care homes - my benefit-risk analysis of mask wearing is ruffling feathers. I was on the verge of asking for your analysis of Dr Croft’s report which has helped me enormously. Brilliant work as always.

Expand full comment

Hi Valerie, my pleasure. Scots gov carried out no risk assessment on masks. Which is disgraceful. See here- https://ibb.co/mhnj2gM

Also see the following for more on mask and even vaccine harms.

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiry-impact-279

Expand full comment

👍🏻 That’s exactly my point and why I did my own benefit risk analysis - with help from prof Richard Ennos.

Expand full comment

Mask wearing causes serious mental and physical harms for ZERO benefit.

Click on 'impacts of the pandemic' each section.

''Many of the measures implemented to reduce the spread of COVID-19 had specific implications for disabled people. For example, the introduction and widespread use of face masks presented particular issues.''

https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/strategy-plan/2023/11/mental-health-wellbeing-delivery-plan-2023-2025/documents/mental-health-equality-evidence-report-2023/mental-health-equality-evidence-report-2023/govscot%3Adocument/mental-health-equality-evidence-report-2023.pdf

Expand full comment

What has struck me is that with all due respect to Dr Croft, men and women like bilogyphenom have been trying to inform people, the ones who will listen, the exact same points that Dr Croft has been talking about. They have been warning the public from the beginning about the pandemic measures, covid protocols, harmful vaccines, masking and many more damaging actions brought down on the populations. It does not take a medical degree, epidemiological specialist, immunisation and vaccine specialist and the many qualifications he has to recognise how harmful and damaging all of the measures taken under the name of "covid prevention" has been. I truly appreciate that Dr Croft is standing firm and has principles but so have many men and women from the beginning of 2020 who knew right from wrong without any medical or science degree

Expand full comment

Super points yet again Amat- ''It does not take a medical degree, epidemiological specialist, immunisation and vaccine specialist and the many qualifications he has to recognise how harmful and damaging all of the measures taken under the name of "covid prevention" has been.''

Expand full comment

I totally agree it doesn't take pre-eminent qualifications, experience or perception to carrive at these conclusions.

But to have someone if this mans "standing" in orthodoxy to be so critical (even if he felt obliged to be as polite as possible) is much more powerful than someone like me railing from the "pit of public hysteria".

I found some of his comments, especially when delivered with a little knowing smile to be utterly damning.

Thanks for putting this together.

Perhaps Matt Goodwin or even John Cleese will do a supportive-stack?

No point asking Neil Oliver et al.

Expand full comment

Yes Dr.Croft should be highly commended for this evidence session as he truly did stick to THE science within the orthodoxy

Expand full comment

The "father of the Convid vaccines" is saved by divine intervention bs. Burned down the village to save the village & his blind followers do the same as the lefties by calling anyone who points this out to them; you're suffering from TDS. Left; anti vaxx vitriol. Right; TDS vitriol. Trust none of the bastards.👍🇦🇺

Expand full comment