"[Hugo Keitch KC] I don’t want to take time looking at those [issues, etc.]". One might have thought that an enquiry was there precisely to do just that: to look into the issues.
I wouldn't worry too much about the apparent reluctance of the establishment to engage with the damning evidence. It was ever thus. Look at what happened to Andrew Bridgen. What matters is that the public themselves come to an awareness of what's happened and that's down to columns like this one.
Yes Jim a comment that would otherwise have gone unreported. Says it all does it not? Yes, totally agree ONLY the public can now change things. The 'ordinary' men and women.
Hugo Keith, hand picked like Hallett, to steer and block the truth (of the evidence) so that there's a nice 'clean' summary at the end of this expensive charade. They will be paid handsomely, and will be fulsome in their praise for each other for 'conducting' a 'thorough' Inquiry.
750 is not an insignificant number but Keith refers to such a number as 'rare side effects'....that must not be used to undermine! the vital public health role that vaccinations play " in keeping people safe from disease". Thus speaks the government's onsider, concerned with his remuneration not the truth nor justice.
Yes she was understandably nervous too and also ill and yet the KC was closing her down when crucial points were to be made. Really noticeable but not to the BBC.
What an utter disgrace. Someone said to me this morning that it was a pity there wasn't another Guy Fawkes in London. I won't carry on as I've just written a scathing letter to the Scottish Health Minister Neil Gray regarding the lack of dentistry provision in Argyll, and anyway, it has probably all been said below. I've just had Covid! And yes I do believe it was developed as part of a bio-warfare research project funded by the West, so I am livid and prone to sarcasm! Nice to be here.
Thanks for this Dave, really appreciate the time you take to highlight the main points. Ruth did brilliantly and to be honest, despite the interruptions, I think the KC did okay in drawing out salient points - only those relevant to the inquiry of course. The problem in my view is Lady Hallet’s take away message of the apparent similarities between ‘long Covid’ and vax injury. No prizes for guessing what conclusion she’s likely to come to.
I agree vs Ruth that's not easy. An astute observation on 'Long COVID' i should have pointed that out but like Hugo Keith KC i suppose i just don't have the time. lol
This whole 'enquiry' is a vastly expensive sham, designed to make the plebs believe 'something is being done'.
There was never any intention to hold anyone to account. The conclusion was written before the enquiry even started: "Lessons will be learned and we must lock down even earlier and harder in the next pandemic".
True but ironically also false at the same time because if people are looking for evidence of what really took place what more could they ask for? Hence why THIS is not reported by ANY media in the world. You ARE being told what happened.
I agree of course that the information is out there, thanks in no small part to your hard work in dissecting the evidence. But the same corporate media that parroted the government line for three year are still taking orders from their masters to ignore and suppress any meaningful findings from the enquiry, so it takes a bit of curiosity and initiative to find them.
It's also sadly the case that the vast majority of the public who were brainwashed into believing the propaganda and fear porn will never seek the truth or, even worse, admit they were wrong. It's a natural human reaction, far easier to avoid guilt by treating the whole episode as just a bad memory and filing it away in the 'too difficult' box.
"[Hugo Keitch KC] I don’t want to take time looking at those [issues, etc.]". One might have thought that an enquiry was there precisely to do just that: to look into the issues.
I wouldn't worry too much about the apparent reluctance of the establishment to engage with the damning evidence. It was ever thus. Look at what happened to Andrew Bridgen. What matters is that the public themselves come to an awareness of what's happened and that's down to columns like this one.
Yes Jim a comment that would otherwise have gone unreported. Says it all does it not? Yes, totally agree ONLY the public can now change things. The 'ordinary' men and women.
Hugo Keith, hand picked like Hallett, to steer and block the truth (of the evidence) so that there's a nice 'clean' summary at the end of this expensive charade. They will be paid handsomely, and will be fulsome in their praise for each other for 'conducting' a 'thorough' Inquiry.
750 is not an insignificant number but Keith refers to such a number as 'rare side effects'....that must not be used to undermine! the vital public health role that vaccinations play " in keeping people safe from disease". Thus speaks the government's onsider, concerned with his remuneration not the truth nor justice.
17% of 1,400 Scottish NHS healthcare workers admit they suffered a serious adverse reaction from a dose of a COVID vaccine and was the main reason they refused another. Extrapolate that to Scotland as a whole would = 900,000 people having suffered a serious adverse event. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/national-survey-of-healthcare-workers?utm_source=publication-search
Of course, agreed, meant to add to the number 750 'tip of the iceberg'.
See feedback v excess deaths inquiry which was quickly closed.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/excess-deaths-scotlandpublic-consultation?utm_source=publication-search
Ruth did amazing as KC Tried to shut her down at every opportunity!! This has not gone unnoticed by us all !
Ruth held her composure in a difficult situation & we are truly grateful 🙏 to her 💜
I hope this highlights the continued censorship and discrimination we continue to receive
Yes she was understandably nervous too and also ill and yet the KC was closing her down when crucial points were to be made. Really noticeable but not to the BBC.
Absolutely. Not much care thought or sympathy given sadly 😔
BBC ....well who actually takes notice of a government biased paid for media 🤔
What an utter disgrace. Someone said to me this morning that it was a pity there wasn't another Guy Fawkes in London. I won't carry on as I've just written a scathing letter to the Scottish Health Minister Neil Gray regarding the lack of dentistry provision in Argyll, and anyway, it has probably all been said below. I've just had Covid! And yes I do believe it was developed as part of a bio-warfare research project funded by the West, so I am livid and prone to sarcasm! Nice to be here.
You may want to reconsier what 'COVID' really is Janice? See below video. Well done for writing a letter to a Scottish politician i gave up long ago.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newdeath-data-review-scotland
Thanks for this Dave, really appreciate the time you take to highlight the main points. Ruth did brilliantly and to be honest, despite the interruptions, I think the KC did okay in drawing out salient points - only those relevant to the inquiry of course. The problem in my view is Lady Hallet’s take away message of the apparent similarities between ‘long Covid’ and vax injury. No prizes for guessing what conclusion she’s likely to come to.
I agree vs Ruth that's not easy. An astute observation on 'Long COVID' i should have pointed that out but like Hugo Keith KC i suppose i just don't have the time. lol
" i don’t want to take time looking at those"
Translation: we don't want to expose the harms of the shots in broad daylight.
KC is another enabler of mass murder.
They are never going to take responsibility for what they did it's all denial.
This whole 'enquiry' is a vastly expensive sham, designed to make the plebs believe 'something is being done'.
There was never any intention to hold anyone to account. The conclusion was written before the enquiry even started: "Lessons will be learned and we must lock down even earlier and harder in the next pandemic".
True but ironically also false at the same time because if people are looking for evidence of what really took place what more could they ask for? Hence why THIS is not reported by ANY media in the world. You ARE being told what happened.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
I agree of course that the information is out there, thanks in no small part to your hard work in dissecting the evidence. But the same corporate media that parroted the government line for three year are still taking orders from their masters to ignore and suppress any meaningful findings from the enquiry, so it takes a bit of curiosity and initiative to find them.
It's also sadly the case that the vast majority of the public who were brainwashed into believing the propaganda and fear porn will never seek the truth or, even worse, admit they were wrong. It's a natural human reaction, far easier to avoid guilt by treating the whole episode as just a bad memory and filing it away in the 'too difficult' box.