20 Comments
User's avatar
jim peden's avatar

"[Hugo Keitch KC] I don’t want to take time looking at those [issues, etc.]". One might have thought that an enquiry was there precisely to do just that: to look into the issues.

I wouldn't worry too much about the apparent reluctance of the establishment to engage with the damning evidence. It was ever thus. Look at what happened to Andrew Bridgen. What matters is that the public themselves come to an awareness of what's happened and that's down to columns like this one.

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

Yes Jim a comment that would otherwise have gone unreported. Says it all does it not? Yes, totally agree ONLY the public can now change things. The 'ordinary' men and women.

Expand full comment
Seacat's avatar

Hugo Keith, hand picked like Hallett, to steer and block the truth (of the evidence) so that there's a nice 'clean' summary at the end of this expensive charade. They will be paid handsomely, and will be fulsome in their praise for each other for 'conducting' a 'thorough' Inquiry.

750 is not an insignificant number but Keith refers to such a number as 'rare side effects'....that must not be used to undermine! the vital public health role that vaccinations play " in keeping people safe from disease". Thus speaks the government's onsider, concerned with his remuneration not the truth nor justice.

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

17% of 1,400 Scottish NHS healthcare workers admit they suffered a serious adverse reaction from a dose of a COVID vaccine and was the main reason they refused another. Extrapolate that to Scotland as a whole would = 900,000 people having suffered a serious adverse event. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/national-survey-of-healthcare-workers?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
Seacat's avatar

Of course, agreed, meant to add to the number 750 'tip of the iceberg'.

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

See feedback v excess deaths inquiry which was quickly closed.

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/excess-deaths-scotlandpublic-consultation?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
Kirst's avatar

Ruth did amazing as KC Tried to shut her down at every opportunity!! This has not gone unnoticed by us all !

Ruth held her composure in a difficult situation & we are truly grateful 🙏 to her 💜

I hope this highlights the continued censorship and discrimination we continue to receive

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

Yes she was understandably nervous too and also ill and yet the KC was closing her down when crucial points were to be made. Really noticeable but not to the BBC.

Expand full comment
Kirst's avatar

Absolutely. Not much care thought or sympathy given sadly 😔

BBC ....well who actually takes notice of a government biased paid for media 🤔

Expand full comment
Janice Gale's avatar

What an utter disgrace. Someone said to me this morning that it was a pity there wasn't another Guy Fawkes in London. I won't carry on as I've just written a scathing letter to the Scottish Health Minister Neil Gray regarding the lack of dentistry provision in Argyll, and anyway, it has probably all been said below. I've just had Covid! And yes I do believe it was developed as part of a bio-warfare research project funded by the West, so I am livid and prone to sarcasm! Nice to be here.

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

You may want to reconsier what 'COVID' really is Janice? See below video. Well done for writing a letter to a Scottish politician i gave up long ago.

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newdeath-data-review-scotland

Expand full comment
Valerie Nelson's avatar

Thanks for this Dave, really appreciate the time you take to highlight the main points. Ruth did brilliantly and to be honest, despite the interruptions, I think the KC did okay in drawing out salient points - only those relevant to the inquiry of course. The problem in my view is Lady Hallet’s take away message of the apparent similarities between ‘long Covid’ and vax injury. No prizes for guessing what conclusion she’s likely to come to.

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

I agree vs Ruth that's not easy. An astute observation on 'Long COVID' i should have pointed that out but like Hugo Keith KC i suppose i just don't have the time. lol

Expand full comment
The Underdog's avatar

" i don’t want to take time looking at those"

Translation: we don't want to expose the harms of the shots in broad daylight.

KC is another enabler of mass murder.

Expand full comment
Claire's avatar

Thanks for posting. This lady does so well dealing with this line of questioning…Horrendous

Expand full comment
Claire's avatar

While I appreciate that everyone has busy lives and these sessions are lengthy, and while I appreciate that your summary does indeed make it much, much easier to digest, as I also have time constraints, what puzzles me is, that is the same excuse other’s make about anything to do with Agenda 2030...

Why don’t others just admit that their apathy and lack of concern is the true cause, and unless this has affected others personally, it seems that many are too immersed in daily life to concern themselves too much with the suffering of others.

Let’s hope they are prepared for the next lockdown, the door to door forced vaccinations without consent, martial law, state control…it is all on its way.

Tyranny is going to be knocking at their door.

Thank you for summarising this and making it easy to digest.

Now that you have listened to the feedback, are the same group listening more, caring more, proactively sharing your SS?

Expand full comment
M H's avatar

They are never going to take responsibility for what they did it's all denial.

Expand full comment
Martin P's avatar

This whole 'enquiry' is a vastly expensive sham, designed to make the plebs believe 'something is being done'.

There was never any intention to hold anyone to account. The conclusion was written before the enquiry even started: "Lessons will be learned and we must lock down even earlier and harder in the next pandemic".

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

True but ironically also false at the same time because if people are looking for evidence of what really took place what more could they ask for? Hence why THIS is not reported by ANY media in the world. You ARE being told what happened.

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing

Expand full comment
Martin P's avatar

I agree of course that the information is out there, thanks in no small part to your hard work in dissecting the evidence. But the same corporate media that parroted the government line for three year are still taking orders from their masters to ignore and suppress any meaningful findings from the enquiry, so it takes a bit of curiosity and initiative to find them.

It's also sadly the case that the vast majority of the public who were brainwashed into believing the propaganda and fear porn will never seek the truth or, even worse, admit they were wrong. It's a natural human reaction, far easier to avoid guilt by treating the whole episode as just a bad memory and filing it away in the 'too difficult' box.

Expand full comment