27 Comments

The lack of promotion of this inquiry by "freedom fighters" just goes to show how many gatekeepers there are on Substack.

Trust them at you peril, because if they "can't" see the value in this, they can't be trusted to write or utter a single word which hadn't been put in front of them by their masters.

Expand full comment

Couldn't agree more Ralph. It's a real litmus test. This is the world's best evidence of what really happened in 2020. Why is it ignored or only ever briefly covered by so many in the freedom space able to reach millions? This is also an ONGOING inquiry.

Expand full comment

Which makes it even worse. There is still time for those with the massive readership to spread the word.

Bloody Hell, we even have a GBNews presenter on here going on about his 60k+ readership all the time!

Expand full comment

There IS still time. Yeah it's brutal to see so many other topics get 1-2 hour podcasts etc just never this. Personally i think alot are afraid of being cancelled and or ego damage of accepting they have missed it and going back is not a good look vs their paid followers especially when they realise i (also @freedompodcast) covered it for free. They would ask why now?

Expand full comment

If it's not gatekeeping, I think ego explains it. There's certainly a lot of both on SS.

Expand full comment

Yes i notice they can every bit as ruthless as those in the mainstream they purport to be against especially if you question them.. They BOTH have something else in common. Neither felt this was important enough to inform their viewers of. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing

Expand full comment

A huge thanks to you Biologyphenom for keeping this issue front and centre of our minds. There should be global trials for Crimes committed against humanity but only way this could/would happen is if Reiner Fuellmich is released from prison to bring this to fruition. I wholeheartedly disagree when in his summation, the lawyer in the last clip states that lockdowns (I call them lockups now) were something like an understandable effort - NO, NO, NO! - again they were huge State/Globallist overreach and one of many mass hysterical over reactions and fraudulent acts for the well documented Great 4th Industrial Revolution re-set.

Expand full comment

Thanks Eloise. What's unique about the Scottish inquiry is that aswell as trying to cover up THE truth the sheer scale of harms inflicted by lockdown not 'COVID' is so immense it's impossible to do so. Sadly there is no real mainstream media willing to state the obvious about 2020.

Expand full comment

No, absolutely and agreed, that is because the mainstream media were all disgracefully complicit in keeping the ‘Fake Covid 19 Show’ on the road with all its bells and whistles…😩🥲

Expand full comment

Indeed and it must be a breach of press standards not to have reported the following. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing

Expand full comment

One would assume so?…but there’s probably some legal loophole for reporting truths as press members which Blair and his acolytes dreamt up from back in 1997 😂 - we must tear down all their laws which altered our original British Constitution.

Expand full comment

(The Fabian Society et al…)

Expand full comment

(This paragraph was copied and pasted from modern historyproject.org)

A reader recently asked about a U.K. organisation called "Common Purpose". From a quick review of their website, CP appears to be another Fabian socialist "third way" organization training management cadres for the global collective, as H.G. Wells described in his "Open Conspiracy". Note that the founder and chairman is a graduate of the London School of Economics, founded by the Fabians. Here's a video presentation critical of their activities.

However, this is nothing new. The Labour Party itself was founded by the Fabians. Party leader and prime minister Tony Blair is a member, a Vice President of the Socialist International, and a champion for the E.U. Now it turns out that he's an agent of the Vatican as well. Imagine that! Common Purpose is small beer by comparison.

See the new database entry for Common Purpose. Their "Matrix" programme has a rather Orwellian name. If you recall the recent movie with that title, the actors could voluntarily choose whether to participate or to escape from the illusion created to mask their slavery, although escape was much more difficult.

The clenched fist of the Socialist International may be holding a red rose these days -- but it's still a fist. And you'd better smile when you walk past those face scanning cameras all over the city, comrade. Big Brother IS watching you!

Expand full comment

theworldwent mad. the tvfearporn

Expand full comment

And it's going to happen again.

Expand full comment

What is revealed here, is more than horrendous. All those persons, from those who gave these orders, to those carrying them out should have to personally account for their actions, particularly the Scottish government personal involved.

Expand full comment

We are a society is total denial of what has transpired. 'COVID' = get out of jail free card.

--From April 2020 the restrictions were known to be causing harm--

''‘People were clinically deteriorating because of the absence of family and normal activity.’’

-Dr.Donald Macaskill CEO Scottish Care

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiry-impact-38d?utm_source=publication-search

--MSPs and public health ignored family concerns from August 2020--

https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiry-revisited?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment

I think your reference to the holocaust is appropriate. Our nation was gripped by a mass psychosis engineered by an ambitious few, amplified by others and absorbed by many The result was another catastrophe. We have yet to find out the true scale of this latest human disaster.

Expand full comment

"I have no idea why the consultation on further steps towards vaccination as a condition of deployment [did it mean employment?] were not taken forward, but I imagine these reactionary pressures are likely to be a reason." -Paragraph 167 of statement

I don't know if this was part of Mr Hancock's statement or not but it's revealing that those who pointed out the obvious problems with the medications, despite the attempt to dismiss them out of hand, had a bigger effect than we were led to believe.

Expand full comment

Deployment is more accurate as everything is seen through the lens of a war and that is true.

Expand full comment

I keep writing to the editor of the i newspaper to ask why his journalists don’t cover the Scottish or English covid enquiries. He never replies.

Despite having no religious affiliations I attended the Holocaust Memorial Day service at Exeter cathedral today. This is what the Dean, the very Reverend Jonathan Greener, wrote about it. An important message I believe.

On Monday we shall keep Holocaust Memorial Day, the day each year when we remember and seek to learn from the Holocaust. Between the German invasion of the Soviet Union in the summer of 1941 and the end of the War in Europe in May 1945, Nazi Germany and its accomplices strove to murder every Jew under their domination. They succeeded in murdering approximately six million – the population of Exeter 50 times over. The Jews were not the only victims of Hitler’s regime. They also targeted the disabled, homosexuals, gypsies, Slavs, and Jehovah’s Witnesses, but Jews were the only group that the Nazis sought to destroy entirely.

It is easy to assume therefore that the Holocaust is all about Jews. But it is also very much about Christians: very much a part of the Church’s story. For the other players, perpetrators, collaborators and bystanders, were primarily Christian – from the great Lutheran and Catholic traditions. Somehow, they had lost that which made them followers of Jesus, or they had chosen to suppress it in their horrid pursuit of killing Jews. When we think about the Holocaust, not only do we need to know what happened to the Jews, but also what happened to Christians.

Consider a fairly pressing question: Why the Jews? Which leads at once to one of the most uncomfortable truths we have to stomach: that Nazi ideology owes its image of the Jew to long-term Christian antisemitism. So, Hitler’s thinking was not original when he wrote that the Jew remains “a sponger who, like a noxious bacillus, keeps spreading as soon as a favourable medium invites him. And the effect of his existence is also like that of spongers: wherever he appears, the host people dies out after a shorter or longer period.” In writing this, Hitler was building on 1,900 years of Christian tradition, which had frequently depicted Jews as ‘killers of the Son of God’. Let’s not forget that in 1290, England was the first country to order the whole Jewish population to leave, by royal decree; thereby seeking to be a Christian territory with no Jewish presence.

By the 19th century, because many Jews never fitted into the surrounding Christian society, they were easy targets in places undergoing rapid industrialisation and change. They went to Synagogue on Saturday, not church on Sunday; they celebrated their own festivals, and ate their own food. Hence, they became ‘the other’ – marginalised, persecuted, blamed for every woe, from unemployment and slums to military defeats and unsolved murders. In the 1920s and 30s, Hitler had a fertile seedbed to exploit for his own purposes.

And gradually his vision crystallised for a new world order – one in which the invented master race had the duty to rule over others. And because this utopian vision would raise Germany from its profound emotional and financial inter-war crisis, it seduced a layer of intellectuals: academicians, teachers, students, bureaucrats, doctors, lawyers, engineers and, of course, churchmen. They all joined the Nazi Party because of its promised future and status for their nation. It was this cadre of intellectuals that gave the vision credibility amongst the masses.

A key purpose of Holocaust Memorial Day is to learn lessons from the past to create a safer, better future. And throughout the Holocaust there were of course Christians who did great things to help the Jews. I remember the powerful effect of first seeing the film Au Revoir les Enfants in the late 1980s. But there weren’t all that many Père Jeans during the war. The State of Israel recognises some 27,000 so-called Righteous among the Nations, that is non-Jews who risked their lives to save Jews from extermination by the Nazis – some Christians, by no means all. But the biggest challenge for Christians is that while Hitler and many of his colleagues hated Christianity and planned to destroy it once Germany won the war, nevertheless some key Nazis were active in the Church. And many ordinary Christians took part in actions that they had no idea they were capable of.

Hermann Goering, the highest ranking soldier in Germany, and second to Hitler in promoting the Reich, was brought up in a Christian home. Some who took part in mass shootings, worked as guards in the concentration camps, and imposed widespread starvation, continued to read the Bible, attend church, pray and sing hymns with their families.

In 1946, just after the end of the war, the Swiss playwright Max Frisch observed: “When people who enjoyed the same education as I do, who love the same books, the same music, the same paintings as I do – when those people are by no means safe from the option to turn into barbarians and to do things that we would not have thought to be possible… from where should I derive the confidence that I myself am safe from it?” That’s the question we have to ask every time we remember the Holocaust.

After all, most church leaders in Germany welcomed Hitler’s rise to power: like the rest of their compatriots, they resented all the blame for the First World War being attributed to Germany. In April 1933 the Protestant churches came together to form a new “national” church, the German Evangelical Church, believing this centralisation would improve relationships between Church and State. These so-called German Christians (“Deutsche Christen”) pushed for Hitler's advisor on religious affairs, Ludwig Müller, to be elected as the new Church's bishop. He spent his time trying to integrate Nazi ideology and Protestant Christianity, purging the Church of all its Jewish components, and promoting the Hitler cult. As early as 1934, he claimed: “We must emphasise with all decisiveness that Christianity did not grow out of Judaism but developed in opposition to Judaism.” The very words of a Christian bishop.

Not everyone was willing to travel in this direction, thank God: Karl Barth and Dietrich Bonhoeffer are well known exceptions; as is Martin Niemöller who served as a submarine commander in World War I. Deeply shaken by the German defeat in World War I, Niemöller left the military, and was ordained a Protestant minister. Having voted for the Nazis in 1924, he was disenchanted with their attacks on the Church. So, he became a leader of a dissenting group, later known as the Confessing Church, and at a meeting with Hitler in 1934 was outspoken in his objections. From then on, he was followed by the Gestapo. It’s worth noting that his opposition was not founded on his dislike of antisemitism. His opposition lay in his concern to maintain the Church’s independence.

In 1937, Niemöller was arrested for pulpit abuse, a fact that shocked Confessing Christians, thinking the Nazis would avoid attacking a man of Niemöller’s stature and fame. He was released after seven months, but Hitler was so angry, he had the Gestapo re-arrest him. He was sent to Sachsenhausen concentration camp and later to Dachau, where he was interned until the end of the war.

One reason I warm to Niemöller is that he was a compromised, and hence vulnerable, individual. He never denied his guilt in the time of the Nazi regime, but claimed his eight years in prison were a turning point. He then became an ardent pacifist, and in 1961 was made President of the World Council of Churches. He is though best remembered for his well known poem:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.

There’s no time here to delve more deeply into these questions or consider the position of Roman Catholics in Eastern Europe, but all these memories confront the contemporary institutional Church with some important questions. Have we really learned anything? Do the Church’s theological and political positions nowadays always give priority and dignity to human individuals? The big danger surely with both current Safeguarding Policies and the continuing debate concerning Prayers of Love and Faith and the Church’s welcome for same-sex couples: the default position is to continue to put the wellbeing of the Institution ahead of the individual. Whereas Holocaust Memorial Day pushes us inexorably in the opposite direction.

Do join us on Monday morning for our memorial gathering at 10am.

Expand full comment

Thanks for that very thoughtful message Jane. We can see the similarities with the concentration camp conditions and the COVID lockdown policies from 2020. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/new1940s-vs-2020s-a-historical-comparison?utm_source=publication-search I would add i have also contacted various msm outlets without reply. I have also contacted Amnesty international and various Christian organisations to be greeted with the same silence. The ONLY Christian news outlet showing a real interest was Heart. Maybe that is an edition to order and distribute amongst the flock if you don't know about them? God bless. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newscottish-covid-19-inquiry-makes?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment

Scotland's shame. This was our worst moment as a so-called democracy, because the system failed utterly to protect those who were most vulnerable.

Expand full comment

We can agree to disagree Rob. Mistakes were not made. The vulnerable were crushed for the best part of 2 years by lockdown policies without which there would have been no pandemic claim. But at least we can all acknowledge Autscwitz 80 years ago and forget about the last 5. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/breakingscottish-covid-inquiry-closing-d0f?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment

Yes, and to be fair, the sufferings of the people in the Ukraine conflict (on all sides) Darfur, and Gaza, put a lot of my and our problems into perspective. However, we have little control over those - this was indeed a shocking self-inflicted injury, and five years on , like you, I am seething.

Expand full comment

Justice means nothing to the people in the enquiry, only they put people on trial who are victims,who lost their loved ones.l hope they get heard.

Expand full comment