To ask you to gather video evidence and then not use a single second screening what you so diligently garnered...my goodness! I don't know how you remained so calm?
It's not simply the rudeness. Why should you have had to collate the videos in the first place? But the absolute temerity to move ahead without a qualm is stomach churning.
A pox on all their houses...
You can be proud of yourself for what you achieved.
'' I don't know how you remained so calm?'' - Sadly i'm used to this sort of stuff now. Another example is i sent HART Group on 12th March 2025 a ''was there really a pandemic?'' video for their Twitter after they said they wanted to work with me to promote more of the inquiry evidence, no reply. Thanks. Yes i suppose i am very proud of my expose' of the inquiry but aghast so many 'outspoken' with big platforms don't seem to think it's that big a deal.
After 5 years there is no other option but to assume they are not working to the same ends.
The strongest most authentic voices are those working for free. And I don’t want to hear that bullshit about supporting folk to do good work. I been resisting vaccines for over 15 years every single day! For free, because it is the right thing to do.
CK turning a profit or creating a circular economic framework is of no fkn concern during a vaccine and medical genocide.
Your work is sterling and valued by many. Some forces would rather it didn’t see the light of day. Onwards.
Thanks Tess. There are alot of ironic elements i find of FREEdom movements and personalities where you have to PAY THEM for apparently crucial to your survival content, even on substack some want money for you just to leave a comment. I've also been the subject of having valid comments removed from various well known 'awake' names and brands. Lots of it doesn't stack up to me and the fact i've hard to work this hard to even get the inquiry acknowledged is testament to something unnatural going on in the world.
I thought it was a letdown even with short but brilliant content. It was not taken seriously, not covered seriously by the English press and relied on social media to get the message out. Shame on the SNP for again letting the people down. Sweeney needs to understand he's there to represent us not lord it over us. He will not last if he doesn't wise up. Scots are beginning to wake up and smell their slavery. We will not be conned again.
I wouldn't expect the mainstream press to be interested, sadly but i would have expected much greater interest from those with the biggest platforms 'speaking out' but on Scottish inquiry they are both in lockstep. Which is sad for CKE as they could use a boost in subscribers etc and also this substack.
I think I’m right in saying Dave that you weren’t at the event and probably haven’t met the organisers and speakers in question. I wonder if you’d still feel the same about their motives if you had met them in person, shaken their hands, shared food together and had the opportunity to look them in the eyes as they would yours. You might even have met them for a drink after the event where you could have talked about your concerns before sharing them here. I respect your decision to remain anonymous but I’m sure you’ll agree that it doesn’t come without some challenges.
I don't actually see how by meeting people 'speaking out' that would change anything. The evidence is all in my substack. If they think it's important it's all here. I've said plenty of times i am just a layperson that has stumbled upon startling inquiry evidence everyone else missed.
Valerie, the thing i point out is this is not about me or anyone else but the EVIDENCE and how best that can be used to reach people so a proper awareness can be raised, discussions facilitated. I do find it strange why people would think i would pay £25 to watch (or tbh not watch) an assessment of the inquiry evidence i accumulated for 18 months. The things you talk about can easilly be communicated through email though and lord knows i've tried with almost everyone 'speaking out' as i point out in the article with the exact same results....so in person i very much doubt anything would change. As of March 2025 (>150 testimonies later) i'm waay past the point of trying to convince prominent people that should know better why Scottish inquiry is important.
Your review is a difficult read, but only because you are saying things that are difficult to hear and even more difficult to say out loud.
On one hand, I congratulate Common Knowledge Edinburgh for organising the event and ultimately raising awareness of the inquiry and - crucially for me - the harms caused during lockdown.
The exposure is welcomed. I, as you know, have a problem with paid events, which I will explain further. However, even I was willing to give a pass for the £25 as lunch was included - and venues in Edinburgh aren’t free.
But make no mistake - I don’t believe anyone should be making money off the back of the pandemic or the vaccine injured - that’s another story.
Also people on the panel that I like and respect a great deal…
So, that’s the case for the defence in my devils advocate role here …
Now, all of that aside I don’t disagree with much of what you said in the blog.
I find it very surprising that no footage from the inquiry was used. Very surprised. And unless there was a copyright concern or something else, I can’t see why footage wasn’t used.
The footage we have shared from the inquiry - especially healthcare sector - is thee most damning footage I’ve seen through all of this. It is the entire modus operandi of the entire ‘pandemic’. All laid out to everyone - and yet it seems to have been ignored by many.
Unless I’m reading it wrong or it’s not as powerful as I think, but it was so damning in my eyes.
Now I understand why footage of Bill n Pamela was left out as their testimonies in person were as powerful/ more powerful than the footage. Please tell m they weren’t charged £25 to attend though…… I can’t have that
So that was disappointing. Especially after all of the effort in preparing the footage by yourself. I know the pain, I’ve watched hundreds of hours of the inquiry and spent tens of hours editing out clips - and I get the frustration at lack of recognition or credit for the groundwork.
I also have no issue with paid events but if they run at a big loss then you're probably not going to have any more. Momentum is everything with this and feels like the clock is being run down.
All in all conference felt extremely rushed.
I didn't even have time to add in the fact very early on i think Aug/Sept 2024 Dr.Yeadon immediately agreed (no convincing required) to attend the event and speak remotely and in case he couldn't he even sent CKE an affidavit which i thought ok at the bare minimum this would be read out but of course nothing transpired.
Thing is Russ, i couldn't care less how I am treated. I'm not perfect but what i do comes from a good place. This is about avoidance of discussing the ACTUAL inquiry evidence from those that can make the biggest difference. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newscottish-covid-19-inquiry14-may My account here has been shunned by all the 'big names' in the 'freedom' space for a while reminding them about it and that a 'mention' once/month tops is not really enough. This ultimately says alot more about them than it does me.
Also take this 2 minute clip. Could and should have been played too and then added to Youtube. But nothing about 'Anne's Law' either.
The show goes on. No protests or people getting arrested in 2025 once the human rights abuses of our elders has been confirmed. Many who fought in WW2 against the Nazis.
To repeat that line 14 times AND as an introduction to advertise the actual inquiry event...or another 10 times after i clearly pointed out using Scottish inquiry evidence it was in fact the lockdowns based on no science to remain uncorrected is very odd.
I do hope the conference isn't going along on the basis of that fraudulent claim, leaving the door open for more of the same whenever another "pandemic" is declared.
Common Knowledge Edinburgh
11 Feb
The conference is focused on the criminal negligence and actions that were the response to a 'virus' from the media, the care homes to the vaccines.
Well am not a mind reader Christine but if i look at all the facts as they are from my perspective over the last 18 months vs those 'outspoken' and therefore you would think best placed to make the biggest difference with this evidence the interest doesn't look/feel natural to me but unnatural. Kinda this thing where they mention it and are RELIEVED thereafter they can then forget about it and move onto other topics. No momentum is achieved so no real effect which only helps you know who. Scottish inquiry has been ''managed'' in the 'alt' space is how i have put it.
To ask you to gather video evidence and then not use a single second screening what you so diligently garnered...my goodness! I don't know how you remained so calm?
It's not simply the rudeness. Why should you have had to collate the videos in the first place? But the absolute temerity to move ahead without a qualm is stomach churning.
A pox on all their houses...
You can be proud of yourself for what you achieved.
'' I don't know how you remained so calm?'' - Sadly i'm used to this sort of stuff now. Another example is i sent HART Group on 12th March 2025 a ''was there really a pandemic?'' video for their Twitter after they said they wanted to work with me to promote more of the inquiry evidence, no reply. Thanks. Yes i suppose i am very proud of my expose' of the inquiry but aghast so many 'outspoken' with big platforms don't seem to think it's that big a deal.
After 5 years there is no other option but to assume they are not working to the same ends.
The strongest most authentic voices are those working for free. And I don’t want to hear that bullshit about supporting folk to do good work. I been resisting vaccines for over 15 years every single day! For free, because it is the right thing to do.
CK turning a profit or creating a circular economic framework is of no fkn concern during a vaccine and medical genocide.
Your work is sterling and valued by many. Some forces would rather it didn’t see the light of day. Onwards.
Thanks Tess. There are alot of ironic elements i find of FREEdom movements and personalities where you have to PAY THEM for apparently crucial to your survival content, even on substack some want money for you just to leave a comment. I've also been the subject of having valid comments removed from various well known 'awake' names and brands. Lots of it doesn't stack up to me and the fact i've hard to work this hard to even get the inquiry acknowledged is testament to something unnatural going on in the world.
Bang on. Your intuition is correct.
Praise be to god because these are dark times we are living in.
I thought it was a letdown even with short but brilliant content. It was not taken seriously, not covered seriously by the English press and relied on social media to get the message out. Shame on the SNP for again letting the people down. Sweeney needs to understand he's there to represent us not lord it over us. He will not last if he doesn't wise up. Scots are beginning to wake up and smell their slavery. We will not be conned again.
I wouldn't expect the mainstream press to be interested, sadly but i would have expected much greater interest from those with the biggest platforms 'speaking out' but on Scottish inquiry they are both in lockstep. Which is sad for CKE as they could use a boost in subscribers etc and also this substack.
I think I’m right in saying Dave that you weren’t at the event and probably haven’t met the organisers and speakers in question. I wonder if you’d still feel the same about their motives if you had met them in person, shaken their hands, shared food together and had the opportunity to look them in the eyes as they would yours. You might even have met them for a drink after the event where you could have talked about your concerns before sharing them here. I respect your decision to remain anonymous but I’m sure you’ll agree that it doesn’t come without some challenges.
Many commentators here have met all those involved. David is making astute statements.
I don't actually see how by meeting people 'speaking out' that would change anything. The evidence is all in my substack. If they think it's important it's all here. I've said plenty of times i am just a layperson that has stumbled upon startling inquiry evidence everyone else missed.
Valerie, the thing i point out is this is not about me or anyone else but the EVIDENCE and how best that can be used to reach people so a proper awareness can be raised, discussions facilitated. I do find it strange why people would think i would pay £25 to watch (or tbh not watch) an assessment of the inquiry evidence i accumulated for 18 months. The things you talk about can easilly be communicated through email though and lord knows i've tried with almost everyone 'speaking out' as i point out in the article with the exact same results....so in person i very much doubt anything would change. As of March 2025 (>150 testimonies later) i'm waay past the point of trying to convince prominent people that should know better why Scottish inquiry is important.
Well said Bio and I shall share your email far and wide and it may jangle a few nerve ends!?
Thanks Roy it's all about the inquiry evidence for me nothing more. It needs to be debated rather than ignored.
Your review is a difficult read, but only because you are saying things that are difficult to hear and even more difficult to say out loud.
On one hand, I congratulate Common Knowledge Edinburgh for organising the event and ultimately raising awareness of the inquiry and - crucially for me - the harms caused during lockdown.
The exposure is welcomed. I, as you know, have a problem with paid events, which I will explain further. However, even I was willing to give a pass for the £25 as lunch was included - and venues in Edinburgh aren’t free.
But make no mistake - I don’t believe anyone should be making money off the back of the pandemic or the vaccine injured - that’s another story.
Also people on the panel that I like and respect a great deal…
So, that’s the case for the defence in my devils advocate role here …
1/
Now, all of that aside I don’t disagree with much of what you said in the blog.
I find it very surprising that no footage from the inquiry was used. Very surprised. And unless there was a copyright concern or something else, I can’t see why footage wasn’t used.
The footage we have shared from the inquiry - especially healthcare sector - is thee most damning footage I’ve seen through all of this. It is the entire modus operandi of the entire ‘pandemic’. All laid out to everyone - and yet it seems to have been ignored by many.
Unless I’m reading it wrong or it’s not as powerful as I think, but it was so damning in my eyes.
Now I understand why footage of Bill n Pamela was left out as their testimonies in person were as powerful/ more powerful than the footage. Please tell m they weren’t charged £25 to attend though…… I can’t have that
So that was disappointing. Especially after all of the effort in preparing the footage by yourself. I know the pain, I’ve watched hundreds of hours of the inquiry and spent tens of hours editing out clips - and I get the frustration at lack of recognition or credit for the groundwork.
2/
''Please tell m they weren’t charged £25 to attend though…… I can’t have that ''
- 100% true. I was also expected to buy a ticket.
I also have no issue with paid events but if they run at a big loss then you're probably not going to have any more. Momentum is everything with this and feels like the clock is being run down.
All in all conference felt extremely rushed.
I didn't even have time to add in the fact very early on i think Aug/Sept 2024 Dr.Yeadon immediately agreed (no convincing required) to attend the event and speak remotely and in case he couldn't he even sent CKE an affidavit which i thought ok at the bare minimum this would be read out but of course nothing transpired.
Thing is Russ, i couldn't care less how I am treated. I'm not perfect but what i do comes from a good place. This is about avoidance of discussing the ACTUAL inquiry evidence from those that can make the biggest difference. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newscottish-covid-19-inquiry14-may My account here has been shunned by all the 'big names' in the 'freedom' space for a while reminding them about it and that a 'mention' once/month tops is not really enough. This ultimately says alot more about them than it does me.
Also take this 2 minute clip. Could and should have been played too and then added to Youtube. But nothing about 'Anne's Law' either.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newexclusiveannes-law-consultation?utm_source=publication-search
The show goes on. No protests or people getting arrested in 2025 once the human rights abuses of our elders has been confirmed. Many who fought in WW2 against the Nazis.
I remember that baffling line LET'S NOT FORGET WHAT COVID DID very well. Instant red flag for me.
To repeat that line 14 times AND as an introduction to advertise the actual inquiry event...or another 10 times after i clearly pointed out using Scottish inquiry evidence it was in fact the lockdowns based on no science to remain uncorrected is very odd.
''COVID'' destroyed lives'' is 100% a government/msm line but i thought those at CKE were against all that? Argh. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/scottish-government-jeane-freeman-nicola-sturgeon-b1218479.html
Declaration of Dumfries
Declaration’s Newsletter
11 Feb
I do hope the conference isn't going along on the basis of that fraudulent claim, leaving the door open for more of the same whenever another "pandemic" is declared.
Common Knowledge Edinburgh
11 Feb
The conference is focused on the criminal negligence and actions that were the response to a 'virus' from the media, the care homes to the vaccines.
Then they should have corrected the intoductory statement.
So it was all done merely to feign attention. Grim.
It certainly feels that way to me Maurice.
It appears that most have been bought or silenced
Well am not a mind reader Christine but if i look at all the facts as they are from my perspective over the last 18 months vs those 'outspoken' and therefore you would think best placed to make the biggest difference with this evidence the interest doesn't look/feel natural to me but unnatural. Kinda this thing where they mention it and are RELIEVED thereafter they can then forget about it and move onto other topics. No momentum is achieved so no real effect which only helps you know who. Scottish inquiry has been ''managed'' in the 'alt' space is how i have put it.