The Pfizer Post Marketing had set down CLEARLY the DIS EASES 1921 of them in the "BNT162b2
5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports." See the appendix . PDF (SEARCH )
Many members of the public were aware of this and had seen Pfizer try to hide this publication from view for SEVENTY FIVE YEARS.
Doctors must not be people anymore if they plead ignorant, rather, they are employees of the Giant Pharma companies and therefore work for money, the most money they can get, $VULTURE$.
And the word EXPERIMENTAL was the basis of the description for the mRNA concoction.
I have not yet found the word novel to be a synonym for EXPERIMENTAL.
Did any of the conspirators read the hard evidence way back in 2022/3 that the Pfizer et al claims of safety and effectiveness were spurious forgeries, I wonder? Either way I can understand how painful it must have been for them to admit that this entire thing was a monster scam - and how hard they must have tried to persuade each other that it was all for the 'greater good'.
She represents the vaccine injured and bereaved, and reminds the inquiry that these people are the experts in their own experiences. Ok so far. She speaks of the inadequacy of the payments scheme. Ok so far. Then she undermines everything she’s just said by concluding that the big issue is loss of confidence in vaccines. Never mind, she collects her fees and off she goes. What a waste.
I find it difficult to understand the motivation for the behaviour of the Commission On Human Medicines (CHM) COVID-19 Vaccines Benefit Risk Expert Working Group and some other UK government agencies:
Examples include: Attempts to mould public behaviour by exaggerating of the risk to health of COVID-19 to the working population; repeated reluctance to acknowledge the risk of vaccination to the same demographic; bizarre insistence on secrecy about this evidence; stringent legally enforceable quarantine of the healthy and so a significant rise in government debt; use of the military to censor critical influencers.
I have read that: Dutch government ministers reported to their parliament that their COVID response was directed by NATO; Sweden (one of few non NATO European countries) followed a different path; Michael Gove appeared to suggest to the UK COVID-19 inquiry that our government feared we faced a bioweapon; most US government agencies believe the source of the virus was a bioweapon lab.
If you start thinking like this, the whole scenario makes a bit more sense.
No Keith when you start to understand the following very REAL evidence rather than a fantasy lab leak from Wuhan it makes the most sense as to what has been really going on and it's very uncomfortable. 99.9% of COVID critics have avoided this for 18 months and those that have covered it have only ever given it a glancing acknowledgement. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newnever-forget-2025
She spoke eloquently, but was anyone else really listening? Baroness Hallett barely looked at her and di not thank her. During the same session in closing remarks from the MHRA, we were told the Yellow Card system was working well!
It should be very clear in 2025 to those paying attention the inquiries (Scotland/UK) main job is to protect the pandemic/jab narrative but at the same time the raw truth is also present and readilly available for those who seek it and it's THAT which really should have been focused on. eg-The lack of comments/promotion over the consistent Scottish evidence past 18 months leads me wonder what sort of 'pandemic' evidence would be required anyway by critics to at least make an attempt to properly counter the false narratives of 2020.
NOT GOOD ENOUGH !!!!!!!!!!!
The Pfizer Post Marketing had set down CLEARLY the DIS EASES 1921 of them in the "BNT162b2
5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports." See the appendix . PDF (SEARCH )
Many members of the public were aware of this and had seen Pfizer try to hide this publication from view for SEVENTY FIVE YEARS.
Doctors must not be people anymore if they plead ignorant, rather, they are employees of the Giant Pharma companies and therefore work for money, the most money they can get, $VULTURE$.
And the word EXPERIMENTAL was the basis of the description for the mRNA concoction.
I have not yet found the word novel to be a synonym for EXPERIMENTAL.
No informed consent was ever applied. Ongoing.
Did any of the conspirators read the hard evidence way back in 2022/3 that the Pfizer et al claims of safety and effectiveness were spurious forgeries, I wonder? Either way I can understand how painful it must have been for them to admit that this entire thing was a monster scam - and how hard they must have tried to persuade each other that it was all for the 'greater good'.
They are no further along.Sadlyx
eg-Where is the accountability?
The cover up continues.
She represents the vaccine injured and bereaved, and reminds the inquiry that these people are the experts in their own experiences. Ok so far. She speaks of the inadequacy of the payments scheme. Ok so far. Then she undermines everything she’s just said by concluding that the big issue is loss of confidence in vaccines. Never mind, she collects her fees and off she goes. What a waste.
I find it difficult to understand the motivation for the behaviour of the Commission On Human Medicines (CHM) COVID-19 Vaccines Benefit Risk Expert Working Group and some other UK government agencies:
Examples include: Attempts to mould public behaviour by exaggerating of the risk to health of COVID-19 to the working population; repeated reluctance to acknowledge the risk of vaccination to the same demographic; bizarre insistence on secrecy about this evidence; stringent legally enforceable quarantine of the healthy and so a significant rise in government debt; use of the military to censor critical influencers.
I have read that: Dutch government ministers reported to their parliament that their COVID response was directed by NATO; Sweden (one of few non NATO European countries) followed a different path; Michael Gove appeared to suggest to the UK COVID-19 inquiry that our government feared we faced a bioweapon; most US government agencies believe the source of the virus was a bioweapon lab.
If you start thinking like this, the whole scenario makes a bit more sense.
No Keith when you start to understand the following very REAL evidence rather than a fantasy lab leak from Wuhan it makes the most sense as to what has been really going on and it's very uncomfortable. 99.9% of COVID critics have avoided this for 18 months and those that have covered it have only ever given it a glancing acknowledgement. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newnever-forget-2025
She spoke eloquently, but was anyone else really listening? Baroness Hallett barely looked at her and di not thank her. During the same session in closing remarks from the MHRA, we were told the Yellow Card system was working well!
It should be very clear in 2025 to those paying attention the inquiries (Scotland/UK) main job is to protect the pandemic/jab narrative but at the same time the raw truth is also present and readilly available for those who seek it and it's THAT which really should have been focused on. eg-The lack of comments/promotion over the consistent Scottish evidence past 18 months leads me wonder what sort of 'pandemic' evidence would be required anyway by critics to at least make an attempt to properly counter the false narratives of 2020.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing