I have such a difficultly with testimonies that pretend Covid was real. I understand the intent of these. But I fear they just support the core lie - and the next hoaxdemic.
I understand the power of raw testimony. But I don’t want to share anything that gives the impression’Covid’ was anything but a fraud used to deliberately assault.
Mistakes were not made. For me this has to be central.
Tim, this is the thing. Do you REALLY expect mostly hand picked people at this inquiry or any other to come out and lay out exactly what you want? You and other sceptics agree the gov is corrupt and so all of a sudden they won't be and tell the whole truth? That's not realistic to be polite. PRESSURE has to be applied, the right kind and the Scottish and in parts UK inquiries could apply the pressure. Sceptics don't seem to realise this crucial aspect. The inquiry admissions over the last 2 years have been extraordinary and so imo this 'sceptic everquest' for perfection or saying 'whitewash' only helps those many claim to be against because it's allows so much damning evidence that people were lied to etc to be ignored or buried forever. 'Mistakes were not made' and where in the world has revealled those 'mistakes made' during 'COVID' the most? Scotland. Like what more do sceptics want to hear? I don't get it.
Tim, i'm not. C'mon now! In this case i've literally showed you yet more official evidence of no COVID and you being a no virus guy reply to me ''i can't share this.'' This is where i get confused. We need more than opinions online to get justice and accountabilty is my point. I don't need to commentate and say over and over what thousands of people already are and prefer to let the evidence speak for itself, i believe in people and that deep down know what's gone on. In 2025 i kinda feel like Maximus in the movie Gladiator within the sceptic space, are you not entertained? Room falls silent. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryfeature
I don't need to call anything out the families and care home managers have done that better than anyone but yet popular sceptic incorporated don't want to know is it because maybe THEY want to be the centre of attention? Buy me a coffee, Patreon, Youtube money etc I'll smile at the camera and if you can fund me for another week please wait for your next instalment of 'truth'!? It's a competitive business space rather than collaborative. I'm different that way.
Also with ''mistakes were not made'' there is a popular video about this which i thought was very powerful but what actual evidence was that based on at the time? I recall just some people speaking, Mike/Tess sharing their views. For instance if they/you were in court and asked just in general on what evidence can you to us present mistakes were not made what would be used? I know what would be my goto. I hope you get my point. Alot of people just say stuff which may sound good.....but based on what?
Mike has presented so much evidence in his Substacks. And pointed constantly to the evidence of others even more so in his telegram. Patrick Wood, Frances Leader, Matthew Ehret, so many voices presenting the clear evidence.
“Based on what? “
This is incredibly frustrating . It is equally as frustrating that people are not running with the Scottish inquiry.
How much more evidence do people need to present?
You feel that.
So do the people who have seen all the hard evidence for what the poem says.
''Patrick Wood, Frances Leader, Matthew Ehret, so many voices presenting the clear evidence.'' - But that's not enough to reach ordinary people and certainly does not worry a politician unlike the mountains of official inquiry evidence now in the public domain (hence the media silence) they would be forced to address it and not label things from others as a 'fringe view', 'conspiracy theory' etc It's not how much evidence is out there but the quality of that evidence that matters most. On that note how can this EVER be expected to be surpassed yet it is the most shunned information of the 'COVID era'.
That sums up my thoughts Renee about much of the 'alt/awake' space people want to be entertained rather than informed and many will even pay for it. The poem also mentions if i recall ''don't let them get away with it'' OK, great but i don't think just saying that will facilitate any sort of accountability so then they WILL get away with it?
So you choose NOT to share evidence from an official public inquiry (which is totally fine btw) where a boss specifically says ''there was no COVID'' amongst throusands of people nor did he know of any 'COVID' deaths but at the same time you believe there was no pandemic? Tim, with respect if that's not good enough from officialdom nothing will be.
Of course it's an important message but how credible would it be if you were to try and inform others engrossed in the 'COVID' narrative and more importantly vs say your MP? It would be seen as just a view, the opinion of a few 'controversial experts', there is nothing actionable within it and nothing to really get people paying attention to all that was done in the name of 'COVID'. The inquiry footage on the other hand ticks all the boxes.
Ok, not to be used in court but how is accountability achieved (''don't let them get away with it'') using a poem? I'd say the Scottish inquiry and in parts UK inquiry is the only real hard truth of the 'COVID' era and pierces the veil of lies better than anything else yet critics like Tess have decided it's not that important to dicuss to their large followings compared to other topics. I find that remarkable! Don't let them get away with it...just ignore the only official evidence that exposes many crimes? Makes no sense but it is what it is.
In case it's helpful (as a kind of thought experiment) I've compared two forms of monster denial in the post internet age ...... those who deny "Corona virus" and those who deny "The Loch Ness Monster".
In all seriousness, I feel it's important to put 'corona virus denial' in a broader social (and indeed scientific) context.
If You Know Something Is Killing People and You Carry On, That Is Murder
04/10/2021----------------By Roy R M McIntosh
After reading the report by the BBC Scotland on the elderly deaths in care homes it was shocking to see that there was no mention of this being advised to the Scottish Government to move people from hospitals to clear beds, and that was by Andrews!
Now you do not have to be smart or a doctor to know that every year the care homes struggle to keep ‘bugs’ out of the homes, so taking elderly people from hospitals and sending them to care homes can only be described as criminal. The elderly were not in hospital for a holiday! How did the elderly die? No mention of DNR, Midazolam or Remdesivir…
So, for Krankie Sturgeon to say it was a mistake, is just a lie to cover up killing like never seen before. And it was deliberate, so that is criminal. It was deliberate murder!
Then jump forward to when the injections started and the killing started again. Look at the UK death figures for Jan 2021, and you shall see each week is higher by thousands than the average for previous years. Once again, if you know something is killing people and you carry on, that is murder! Oh, but it is put down to all sorts of other causes: Doctors were falsifying health reports and death certificates.
I wrote in March 2020 and said that moving the elderly would kill people and not one reply. I also wrote to media, Freeman and political parties as I was told by a person from a care home that the injections were maiming and killing, and the only reply I got back was from some Lesley Brown from Scottish government, wondering where I got my information from. I told her where to go… I had written to Freeman, yet Brown replies? Taking the killing of the elderly and now the killing and maiming by injections, the politicians and NHS should be on murder charges!
In time the truth shall come out, and it is good that families have come together to ask questions, and also that the Covid-19 Assembly are working away in the background. Looks like pharma and Gates etc could be pulling the strings!?
From my perspective, the '“resistance” is focused upon infighting, not fighting against our common enemies. It is the same everywhere. In the U. S., it is Demoncrats v. the GOP (Globalist Owned Predators). Both parties are controlled at the top by those who divide us deliberately, and there is a resistance (no pun intended) to recognizing this reality.
So, while we fight each other at the street level, the controllers are plotting against us in the penthouse. The past 5 years have exposed the reality of a global coordination towards a global agenda, yet those who attempt to inform the uninformed are gaslit …, all by design!
I was uninformed until I had a Road to Damascusesque experience. This experience opened the door to a new way of seeing everything that is happening. It has been quite a journey since March 2009. Because of what I have experienced, I endeavor to challenge others to question everything and everyone. Some do, most don't.
From my perspective, anyone who aligns with a political party, even as a voter, is under the control of those who control governments and politics all over the globe from outside of government. If they knew how empowering it is to break free from conditioned conventional thinking, I believe more individuals would take the leap to thinking differently, but human nature has a way of preventing up to 75% of the population from seeing and believing differently from the masses. Hopefully, at some point, some of these individuals will find their inner Braveheart and break free from the controllers!
Human Rights are for the collective. By signing up for so called 'human rights' you're agreeing to be part of their collective. Oldest trick in the book
“Yet more evidence emerges ‘COVID’ was not as widespread nor as deadly as claimed by politicians, public health and the media. For more on this see the following compilation ‘COVID-19 at the Scottish COVID inquiry’ here. To the list can now be added the funfair industry, no ‘COVID’ deaths reported not even any ‘COVID’ cases. Wow!
I could find no media reports of this important evidence.”
Because consistent evidence under oath at an official puiblic inquiry it shows there was no pandemic event as advertised and politicians etc were lying? I can only report inquiry facts as they emerge and people can make of that what they will. I'm not looking for nor expecting 'the perfect pandemic information' to come along but at the Scottish inquiry it's as close as it's ever going to be.
People are not interested in my views as a layperson which i have put out previously many times. The evidence speaks for itself as i've said that's what i want to do the talking. I've no interest in preaching to the choir either. It's popular outspoken medics that need to make the commentary about this not me.
The Scottish inquiry clearly proves Denis was correct ('ve stated this more than once here and elsewhere) but even he does'nt draw much attention to the only official real world evidence under oath that vindicates him. It's like people have a hypothesis, a view which is ridiculed but they stand by it. When their hypothesis etc is later proven as fact from real people that were really there ''on the front lines'' they don't want to know. An unnatural approach to me. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
I have such a difficultly with testimonies that pretend Covid was real. I understand the intent of these. But I fear they just support the core lie - and the next hoaxdemic.
I understand the power of raw testimony. But I don’t want to share anything that gives the impression’Covid’ was anything but a fraud used to deliberately assault.
Mistakes were not made. For me this has to be central.
Tim, this is the thing. Do you REALLY expect mostly hand picked people at this inquiry or any other to come out and lay out exactly what you want? You and other sceptics agree the gov is corrupt and so all of a sudden they won't be and tell the whole truth? That's not realistic to be polite. PRESSURE has to be applied, the right kind and the Scottish and in parts UK inquiries could apply the pressure. Sceptics don't seem to realise this crucial aspect. The inquiry admissions over the last 2 years have been extraordinary and so imo this 'sceptic everquest' for perfection or saying 'whitewash' only helps those many claim to be against because it's allows so much damning evidence that people were lied to etc to be ignored or buried forever. 'Mistakes were not made' and where in the world has revealled those 'mistakes made' during 'COVID' the most? Scotland. Like what more do sceptics want to hear? I don't get it.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newscottish-covid-19-inquirymicheleine?utm_source=publication-search
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
I don’t get why you are suggesting mistakes were made at this stage.
It’s like saying Jack The Ripper’s healing strategies were flawed.
I don’t get it. An assault based on a fraudulent fictional disease. A war on people by a few psychopaths.
A deliberate calculated destruction of health, mental health, the economy, fertility……
If it were me, I would include some commentary with these people inadvertently pushing the central lies.
Tim, i'm not. C'mon now! In this case i've literally showed you yet more official evidence of no COVID and you being a no virus guy reply to me ''i can't share this.'' This is where i get confused. We need more than opinions online to get justice and accountabilty is my point. I don't need to commentate and say over and over what thousands of people already are and prefer to let the evidence speak for itself, i believe in people and that deep down know what's gone on. In 2025 i kinda feel like Maximus in the movie Gladiator within the sceptic space, are you not entertained? Room falls silent. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryfeature
I do think what you’re doing is brilliant. We all have to fight in the way we see best.
I share most of what you post.
All power to your elbow.
I’m not a ‘no virus’ guy. I fight the ‘no virus’ error.
https://open.substack.com/pub/beyondcertainty/p/no-virus-evidence-is-the-fact-to
Thanks for clearing that up.
It’s not about what they say. It’s about lack of commentary in the video calling it out.
I have shared many videos you’ve made . I can’t show videos which effectively pretend the assault was a mistake.
I don't need to call anything out the families and care home managers have done that better than anyone but yet popular sceptic incorporated don't want to know is it because maybe THEY want to be the centre of attention? Buy me a coffee, Patreon, Youtube money etc I'll smile at the camera and if you can fund me for another week please wait for your next instalment of 'truth'!? It's a competitive business space rather than collaborative. I'm different that way.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquirycare-home?utm_source=publication-search
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiry-impact-9ae?utm_source=publication-search
Also with ''mistakes were not made'' there is a popular video about this which i thought was very powerful but what actual evidence was that based on at the time? I recall just some people speaking, Mike/Tess sharing their views. For instance if they/you were in court and asked just in general on what evidence can you to us present mistakes were not made what would be used? I know what would be my goto. I hope you get my point. Alot of people just say stuff which may sound good.....but based on what?
Mike has presented so much evidence in his Substacks. And pointed constantly to the evidence of others even more so in his telegram. Patrick Wood, Frances Leader, Matthew Ehret, so many voices presenting the clear evidence.
“Based on what? “
This is incredibly frustrating . It is equally as frustrating that people are not running with the Scottish inquiry.
How much more evidence do people need to present?
You feel that.
So do the people who have seen all the hard evidence for what the poem says.
If only people knew .
''Patrick Wood, Frances Leader, Matthew Ehret, so many voices presenting the clear evidence.'' - But that's not enough to reach ordinary people and certainly does not worry a politician unlike the mountains of official inquiry evidence now in the public domain (hence the media silence) they would be forced to address it and not label things from others as a 'fringe view', 'conspiracy theory' etc It's not how much evidence is out there but the quality of that evidence that matters most. On that note how can this EVER be expected to be surpassed yet it is the most shunned information of the 'COVID era'.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
I agree.
Margaret Anna Alice’s poem was for us to understand. Not meant to be a presentable in a court case.
So the poem is entertainment....
That sums up my thoughts Renee about much of the 'alt/awake' space people want to be entertained rather than informed and many will even pay for it. The poem also mentions if i recall ''don't let them get away with it'' OK, great but i don't think just saying that will facilitate any sort of accountability so then they WILL get away with it?
“Don’t let them get away with it” is urging the exact opposite!
This was a planned assault. A vicious fraudulent ramping up of the move to a dystopian globalist nightmare.
I fully support your work. And share it. One with a title suggesting some people did get ‘Covid’ I feel I can’t.
Any message that Jack the Ripper only cured a few prostitutes of their devils is dangerous.
Any message that he made errors at this stage will lead to it being ‘done better’ when the next assault happens.
This is a war. A vicious war against humanity. I understand the tack you are taking. I’ll do all I can to help spread the testimony.
I was just letting you know why I choose not to share this one.
So you choose NOT to share evidence from an official public inquiry (which is totally fine btw) where a boss specifically says ''there was no COVID'' amongst throusands of people nor did he know of any 'COVID' deaths but at the same time you believe there was no pandemic? Tim, with respect if that's not good enough from officialdom nothing will be.
Of course it's an important message but how credible would it be if you were to try and inform others engrossed in the 'COVID' narrative and more importantly vs say your MP? It would be seen as just a view, the opinion of a few 'controversial experts', there is nothing actionable within it and nothing to really get people paying attention to all that was done in the name of 'COVID'. The inquiry footage on the other hand ticks all the boxes.
That’s a ridiculous thing to say.
The poem is hard truth.
It’s not meant to be a full presentation of the evidence. It’s just a statement of the hard facts.
It’s meant to pierce the veil of lies. Poetry music and comedy have a way of sliding Truth in.
Ok, not to be used in court but how is accountability achieved (''don't let them get away with it'') using a poem? I'd say the Scottish inquiry and in parts UK inquiry is the only real hard truth of the 'COVID' era and pierces the veil of lies better than anything else yet critics like Tess have decided it's not that important to dicuss to their large followings compared to other topics. I find that remarkable! Don't let them get away with it...just ignore the only official evidence that exposes many crimes? Makes no sense but it is what it is.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-26-nov-2024-260
But equally damning and true and f
I put my view of the shenanigans into song and video!---https://youtu.be/9tJyO90iGko?si=Z-vCxQjdiMUGDUho
In case it's helpful (as a kind of thought experiment) I've compared two forms of monster denial in the post internet age ...... those who deny "Corona virus" and those who deny "The Loch Ness Monster".
In all seriousness, I feel it's important to put 'corona virus denial' in a broader social (and indeed scientific) context.
https://odysee.com/@CoronaStudies:3/CS-Suspicious-Shapes:d
If You Know Something Is Killing People and You Carry On, That Is Murder
04/10/2021----------------By Roy R M McIntosh
After reading the report by the BBC Scotland on the elderly deaths in care homes it was shocking to see that there was no mention of this being advised to the Scottish Government to move people from hospitals to clear beds, and that was by Andrews!
Now you do not have to be smart or a doctor to know that every year the care homes struggle to keep ‘bugs’ out of the homes, so taking elderly people from hospitals and sending them to care homes can only be described as criminal. The elderly were not in hospital for a holiday! How did the elderly die? No mention of DNR, Midazolam or Remdesivir…
So, for Krankie Sturgeon to say it was a mistake, is just a lie to cover up killing like never seen before. And it was deliberate, so that is criminal. It was deliberate murder!
Then jump forward to when the injections started and the killing started again. Look at the UK death figures for Jan 2021, and you shall see each week is higher by thousands than the average for previous years. Once again, if you know something is killing people and you carry on, that is murder! Oh, but it is put down to all sorts of other causes: Doctors were falsifying health reports and death certificates.
I wrote in March 2020 and said that moving the elderly would kill people and not one reply. I also wrote to media, Freeman and political parties as I was told by a person from a care home that the injections were maiming and killing, and the only reply I got back was from some Lesley Brown from Scottish government, wondering where I got my information from. I told her where to go… I had written to Freeman, yet Brown replies? Taking the killing of the elderly and now the killing and maiming by injections, the politicians and NHS should be on murder charges!
In time the truth shall come out, and it is good that families have come together to ask questions, and also that the Covid-19 Assembly are working away in the background. Looks like pharma and Gates etc could be pulling the strings!?
It was a deliberate scam/plandemic designed to panic people into acting irrationally, at best. People playing god never ends well.
Problem is they've said they'll do it again.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-22-nov-2024?utm_source=publication-search
They are devoid of human emotions, they are singularly focused, and they are persistent. They were bots before bots.
I like that Arthur. Bots before bots. lol
They are persistent, organised and determined, indeed. What of the resistance? Is there any?
From my perspective, the '“resistance” is focused upon infighting, not fighting against our common enemies. It is the same everywhere. In the U. S., it is Demoncrats v. the GOP (Globalist Owned Predators). Both parties are controlled at the top by those who divide us deliberately, and there is a resistance (no pun intended) to recognizing this reality.
So, while we fight each other at the street level, the controllers are plotting against us in the penthouse. The past 5 years have exposed the reality of a global coordination towards a global agenda, yet those who attempt to inform the uninformed are gaslit …, all by design!
I was uninformed until I had a Road to Damascusesque experience. This experience opened the door to a new way of seeing everything that is happening. It has been quite a journey since March 2009. Because of what I have experienced, I endeavor to challenge others to question everything and everyone. Some do, most don't.
From my perspective, anyone who aligns with a political party, even as a voter, is under the control of those who control governments and politics all over the globe from outside of government. If they knew how empowering it is to break free from conditioned conventional thinking, I believe more individuals would take the leap to thinking differently, but human nature has a way of preventing up to 75% of the population from seeing and believing differently from the masses. Hopefully, at some point, some of these individuals will find their inner Braveheart and break free from the controllers!
SPOT ON---A flu that was grabbed hold off for an evil agenda!
Individual rights are for individuals.
Human Rights are for the collective. By signing up for so called 'human rights' you're agreeing to be part of their collective. Oldest trick in the book
“Yet more evidence emerges ‘COVID’ was not as widespread nor as deadly as claimed by politicians, public health and the media. For more on this see the following compilation ‘COVID-19 at the Scottish COVID inquiry’ here. To the list can now be added the funfair industry, no ‘COVID’ deaths reported not even any ‘COVID’ cases. Wow!
I could find no media reports of this important evidence.”
!
😟
I can’t share this!
Because consistent evidence under oath at an official puiblic inquiry it shows there was no pandemic event as advertised and politicians etc were lying? I can only report inquiry facts as they emerge and people can make of that what they will. I'm not looking for nor expecting 'the perfect pandemic information' to come along but at the Scottish inquiry it's as close as it's ever going to be.
What is wrong with an editorial comment?
People are not interested in my views as a layperson which i have put out previously many times. The evidence speaks for itself as i've said that's what i want to do the talking. I've no interest in preaching to the choir either. It's popular outspoken medics that need to make the commentary about this not me.
I understand. But what about Professor Rancourt’s papers? Are they less perfect?
The Scottish inquiry clearly proves Denis was correct ('ve stated this more than once here and elsewhere) but even he does'nt draw much attention to the only official real world evidence under oath that vindicates him. It's like people have a hypothesis, a view which is ridiculed but they stand by it. When their hypothesis etc is later proven as fact from real people that were really there ''on the front lines'' they don't want to know. An unnatural approach to me. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing